• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

The Pros of Cons of Genetic Screening

Extracts from this document...


The Pros of Cons of Genetic Screening Introduction The subject of genetic engineering has always been a controversial one, that has divided opinion for years, although in today's society it is more important than ever. Although the possibilities of genetic manipulation have been theorised as early as the 17th century and H. J. Muller was artificially mutating genes of Drosophila with x-rays in 1927, the experiment that really brought the possibilities of genetic engineering to public attention was Dolly the sheep, the first mammal to be cloned from an adult cell, in 1996. Although the first IVF baby was born long before this, in 1978, the controversy that surrounds it is more relevant than ever, since this milestone in genetic history. Since then GM crops, human cloning and genetic screening have all been issues of concern not just for scientists and religious leaders, but by members of the public too. What is Genetic Screening? Genetic screening normally involves two processes IVF (in-vitro fertilisation) and PGD (Pre-implantation genetic diagnosis). In-vitro Fertilization basically involves uniting the egg and the sperm outside of the of the body. The fertilised embryo can then be transferred into the uterus and pregnancy can begin. Pre-implantation genetic diagnosis, or at least it's future implications, is the more controversial of the two stages, and it involves analysing the cells of the embryos before they are transferred back into the woman for genetic disorders which could lead to inherited diseases. ...read more.


Of course, starting from the choice of sex in determining some quality of life, there is a dangerous potential for parents to choose embryos based on aesthetic qualities. While this is obviously morally wrong, there are currently very tight laws on genetics and it looks unlikely it will happen any time soon. Further more, part of a consultation carried out by the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority (HFEA) showed that 69 per cent of Britons believed that unrestricted sex selection should not be allowed and that 80 per cent believed that PGD should not be allowed for non-medical reasons. Public Opinions of PGD and IVF. * Percent Who Agreed with the Statement "Reproductive Genetic Technology will Inevitably lead to Genetic Enhancement and Designer Babies." This is the hot topic right now, and it appears the majority really do believe that current technologies will go as far as designer babies. Interestingly, according to the report (Reproductive Genetic Testing: What America Thinks) , it is not the technologies that people fear, but human nature. "You're trying to get rid of this terrible burden on your children, but at the same time, I don't put as much faith in humanity, because people are greedy. I mean, we're just inherently greedy people and it's never going to be enough." ...read more.


What people don't realize, is that the chances of this government allowing Genetic Screening it to happen is low. Would they allow the creation of "better humans", in a world already populated with six billion 'average' people? Small changes like hair colour and sporting ability may be 'bought' in the future by a small minority, but I don't think it will ever be legal or commonplace. The medical benefits of this technology certainly outweigh these problems. I respect opinions of pro-life supporters, but I am looking at it at a scientific point of view, while they are looking at it from a religious one. No one can know for a fact when life begins and if they believe it begins at conception, then yes, discarding embryos is wrong. In my opinion eight cells is 'potential life', rather than life itself. I personally think the pros far outweigh the cons. As IVF is routinely used, PGD is just a 'safety valve'. The embryos are already out of the body, why not check them for possibly debilitating illnesses? Huntington's and cystic fibrosis can affect a persons whole life, and while I agree that it doesn't necessarily mean a lower quality of life, surely it's an obvious choice for the parent to make. As long as regulations remain tight and technology continues to improve I believe PGD will become more and more accepted as the positive results come out. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Genetics, Evolution & Biodiversity section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Genetics, Evolution & Biodiversity essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    An Investigation into the Mitotic Nuclear Division of Allium Sativum Root Tip Cells, and ...

    5 star(s)

    Because the average has been calculated concerning all of the experimental results obtained from all sources, it may be distorted by any anomalous results observed. This would offer a misrepresentation of results, certainly when conducting the statistical analysis. To resolve this issue, it is necessary to statistically identify and remove

  2. Marked by a teacher

    Pros and Cons of Genetic Engineering

    4 star(s)

    Being completely pure, the bio engineered version of factor VIII eliminates any possibility of viral infection. Other uses of genetic engineering include creating disease resistant crops, formulating milk from cows already containing pharmaceutical compounds, generating vaccines, and altering livestock traits.

  1. Marked by a teacher

    The daphnia lab report

    3 star(s)

    stimulate the central nervous system, while high blood concentrations (10-30 mg/L) produce restlessness, excitement, tremor, tinnitus, headache, and insomnia." (DE/ICCA, 2002). This shows that even low dosage of caffeine work and they probably worked the daphnia in this lab too, but their high blood concentration caused the daphnia to be stressed and slow.

  2. Peer reviewed

    The ethical and social implications of genetic screening

    4 star(s)

    But what does this say about people with inherited disabilities? Does this suggest that these people don't deserve the same chance in life, that they are less than other 'healthy' folk? Or is it wrong to assume that parents would not care for their child, their creation, disabled or not?

  1. The Biology of Autistic Spectrum Disorder and the Social Implications

    They achieved this by working with 28, 000 children. The University did find however, according to the BBC news archives, that autism rates were higher in children after Thimerosal was eliminated from vaccines and after MMR vaccination coverage decreased. The only link to autism was the Thimerosal, which was traditionally

  2. Is genetic screening right or wrong

    Around five per cent of the 41,000 women diagnosed each year develop breast cancer because of inherited flaws in genes - known as BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes - associated with a strong family history of the disease. A further 10 to 15 per cent of all breast cancer cases occur

  1. Outline and Critique the Claim that GeneticTherapy is justified but Genetic Enhancement is not

    patient is treated by such an engineered treatment in order to healing either general diseases or heredity diseases. There are several approaches that often use in genetic therapy to correct any disorder gene. Human Genome Project Information is sorting out these ways of treatment as follows: * The first, which

  2. Who Should Have Access To Genetic Testing Results? Should Genetic Testing Be Mandatory. ...

    So that the relevant bodies can extract the information needed for whatever purpose, and maybe used against them a later date. These issues seem so far away, but the truth is they are not are far as the authorities would like us to believe.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work