• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

The purpose of this laboratory investigation is to verify the validity of the Lens Equation which states that 1/di + 1/do = 1/f.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Lab: Applying the Lens Equation

Daniela Perdomo

Lab Partner: Stephanie Landers

Date: 21 November 2002

Place: Graded School – São Paulo, Brazil

Time: 8:10 h – 9:35 h

Purpose/Introduction: The purpose of this laboratory investigation is to verify the validity of the Lens Equation which states that1/di + 1/do = 1/f, where di is the distance from the image to the lens, do is the distance from the object to the lens, and f is the focal length.

Hypothesis: The laboratory investigators hypothesized that the data obtained in the procedure of this experiment would be consistent with the Lens Equation. Though different methods of obtaining focal lengths (f) will be used throughout the lab, the obtained f’s should still be equal.

Materials:

  • 2 double convex lenses
  • 1 candle
  • 1 box of matches
  • 1 meter stick
  • 1 lens holder
  • 1 cardholder
  • 1 candleholder
  • 1 blank card

Diagram:

Procedure:

The first lens used in this investigation was a double convex lens, which indicates that light should converge when shone through it. The first way used to discover its focal length was by using sunlight. A cardholder, with a card in it, was placed on the meter stick and the lens holder, with the convex lens in it, placed in front of it (i.e. closer to where the sunlight was coming from).

...read more.

Middle

(do)

Card distance

(di)

1/do

1/di

1/do + 1/di

(f)#

1

67.48 ± 0.1 cm

27.00 ± 0.5 cm

22.48 ± 0.2 cm

18.00 ± 0.6 cm

0.445

0.555

0.100

9.99 ± 0.4 cm

2

83.85 ± 0.1 cm

31.15 ± 0.5 cm

38.85 ± 0.2 cm

13.85 ± 0.6 cm

0.026

0.072

0.098

10.21 ± 0.5 cm

3

58.92 ± 0.1 cm

8.50 ± 0.5 cm

13.92 ± 0.2 cm

36.50 ± 0.6 cm

0.072

0.274

0.099

10.07 ± 0.9 cm

4

61.68 ± 0.1 cm

22.49 ± 0.5 cm

16.68 ± 0.2 cm

22.51 ± 0.6 cm

0.060

0.444

0.104

9.58 ± 0.4 cm

5

83.00 ± 0.1 cm

32.16 ± 0.5 cm

38.00 ± 0.2 cm

12.84 ± 0.6 cm

0.026

0.078

0.104

9.60 ± 0.6 cm

6

70.00 ± 0.1 cm

29.39 ± 0.5 cm

25.00 ± 0.2 cm

15.61 ± 0.6 cm

0.040

0.064

0.104

9.61 ± 0.4 cm

# Pleasenote: In trials 1-6 the lens was always placed at the 45.00 ± 0.

...read more.

Conclusion

Suggestions: This laboratory experiment could have been improved by using optics benches instead of the flimsy metal clips and the meter stick used in this lab. Also, though it is impossible to focus on light from infinity, the investigators could have focused on something further away, such as a passing airplane. Perhaps a transparent light bulb could have been used instead and in this manner, the laboratory investigators could look at the light-producing wire, which does not shine as intermittently as candlelight does.  

In addition to all of the above, some more trials could have been performed, and it would have been better to work with larger distances instead of being restrained by a meter stick, because although the same uncertainties would have been applied to the lens positions (all trials), card positions (Part A, “w/ candle”), and do(all trials), ± 0.1 cm uncertainty in a distance of, say, 5-meters would constitute a smaller margin of error than in merely a 1-meter distance.

...read more.

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Microscopes & Lenses section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Microscopes & Lenses essays

  1. To investigate the relationship between the distance between a lens and an object, and ...

    The formula for calculating the results is therefore correct in this case. It is interesting to note that the difference between the predicted and actual results is greater the closer the object is to the lens. This is because the nearer you get to the lens; the more changes and inaccuracies affect the distance of the image of the image.

  2. In this experiment I will be investigating the efficiency of a motor. I hope ...

    and the image distance (v), to two different converging lenses. I will do this by planning out how I will conduct the experiment: * Clear the work top * Setup the power supply and connect the ray box * Blue - Tack the metre rule to the work top, making

  1. Does the focal length of a lens depend on the colour of light used?

    Smallest possible focal length = 0.183 x 0.8952 = 0.164(m) From these values I can see that the focal lengths of the red and blue light do overlap, in that the blue lights highest focal length (0.202(m)) is greater than red's smallest (0.170(m)).

  2. Investigating the Positioning of Real Images formed by a Convex Lens.

    Subsequently I may repeat the experiment using several lenses. If I do this I will keep u fixed, in order to discover the dependant of v and f. 11. Equipment choice for precise data * I will have use a white screen, not lined or graph paper, this will ensure

  1. Relationship Between U and V For a Convex Lens

    Fair Test I shall take the following precautions were made to the experiment, to ensure it was a fair test: * I shall measure in one unit (cm), for the distances between u and v. * I shall make sure that the brightness of the lamp stays the same throughout the experiment (12V).

  2. Lenses experiment

    Using the Complicated Method Uf=V U-f Magnification=V U Ray Diagram 1 2.0x4.0=-4 2.0-4.0 Magnification=-4 2.0 =-2 Ray Diagram 2 4.0x4.0=0 4.0-4.0 Magnification=0 Ray Diagram 3 6.0x4.0=12 6.0-4.0 Magnification=12.0 6.0 =2 Ray Diagram 4 8.0x4.0=8 8.0-4.0 Magnification=8 8.0 =1 Ray Diagram 5 10.0x4.0=6.7 10.0-4.0 Magnification=6.7 10.0 =0.67 From 2 different methods

  1. Proving the lens formula.

    Therefore, I believe that my experiment, if done accurately, should prove that the lens equation is true. Diagram of apparatus Consideration of the variables This Experiment relies heavily on accuracy of measurements and distances. Therefore, it is imperative that these are not affected while measurements are taken.

  2. The focal length of a convex lens.

    The intercepts on the horizontal and vertical axes are the same. By taking the reciprocal of the intercept, the focal length can be determined. Another method of determining the focal length bases on the symmetric property of the two foci.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work