• Join over 1.2 million students every month
• Accelerate your learning by 29%
• Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month
Page
1. 1
1
2. 2
2
3. 3
3
4. 4
4

# The purpose of this laboratory investigation is to verify the validity of the Lens Equation which states that 1/di + 1/do = 1/f.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Lab: Applying the Lens Equation

Daniela Perdomo

Lab Partner: Stephanie Landers

Date: 21 November 2002

## Place: Graded School – São Paulo, Brazil

Time: 8:10 h – 9:35 h

Purpose/Introduction: The purpose of this laboratory investigation is to verify the validity of the Lens Equation which states that1/di + 1/do = 1/f, where di is the distance from the image to the lens, do is the distance from the object to the lens, and f is the focal length.

Hypothesis: The laboratory investigators hypothesized that the data obtained in the procedure of this experiment would be consistent with the Lens Equation. Though different methods of obtaining focal lengths (f) will be used throughout the lab, the obtained f’s should still be equal.

Materials:

• 2 double convex lenses
• 1 candle
• 1 box of matches
• 1 meter stick
• 1 lens holder
• 1 cardholder
• 1 candleholder
• 1 blank card

Diagram:

Procedure:

The first lens used in this investigation was a double convex lens, which indicates that light should converge when shone through it. The first way used to discover its focal length was by using sunlight. A cardholder, with a card in it, was placed on the meter stick and the lens holder, with the convex lens in it, placed in front of it (i.e. closer to where the sunlight was coming from).

Middle

(do)

Card distance

(di)

1/do

1/di

1/do + 1/di

(f)#

1

67.48 ± 0.1 cm

27.00 ± 0.5 cm

22.48 ± 0.2 cm

18.00 ± 0.6 cm

0.445

0.555

0.100

9.99 ± 0.4 cm

2

83.85 ± 0.1 cm

31.15 ± 0.5 cm

38.85 ± 0.2 cm

13.85 ± 0.6 cm

0.026

0.072

0.098

10.21 ± 0.5 cm

3

58.92 ± 0.1 cm

8.50 ± 0.5 cm

13.92 ± 0.2 cm

36.50 ± 0.6 cm

0.072

0.274

0.099

10.07 ± 0.9 cm

4

61.68 ± 0.1 cm

22.49 ± 0.5 cm

16.68 ± 0.2 cm

22.51 ± 0.6 cm

0.060

0.444

0.104

9.58 ± 0.4 cm

5

83.00 ± 0.1 cm

32.16 ± 0.5 cm

38.00 ± 0.2 cm

12.84 ± 0.6 cm

0.026

0.078

0.104

9.60 ± 0.6 cm

6

70.00 ± 0.1 cm

29.39 ± 0.5 cm

25.00 ± 0.2 cm

15.61 ± 0.6 cm

0.040

0.064

0.104

9.61 ± 0.4 cm

# Pleasenote: In trials 1-6 the lens was always placed at the 45.00 ± 0.

Conclusion

Suggestions: This laboratory experiment could have been improved by using optics benches instead of the flimsy metal clips and the meter stick used in this lab. Also, though it is impossible to focus on light from infinity, the investigators could have focused on something further away, such as a passing airplane. Perhaps a transparent light bulb could have been used instead and in this manner, the laboratory investigators could look at the light-producing wire, which does not shine as intermittently as candlelight does.

In addition to all of the above, some more trials could have been performed, and it would have been better to work with larger distances instead of being restrained by a meter stick, because although the same uncertainties would have been applied to the lens positions (all trials), card positions (Part A, “w/ candle”), and do(all trials), ± 0.1 cm uncertainty in a distance of, say, 5-meters would constitute a smaller margin of error than in merely a 1-meter distance.

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Microscopes & Lenses section.

## Found what you're looking for?

• Start learning 29% faster today
• 150,000+ documents available
• Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
• Join over 1.2 million students every month
• Accelerate your learning by 29%
• Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

# Related AS and A Level Microscopes & Lenses essays

1. ## To investigate the relationship between the distance between a lens and an object, and ...

The formula for calculating the results is therefore correct in this case. It is interesting to note that the difference between the predicted and actual results is greater the closer the object is to the lens. This is because the nearer you get to the lens; the more changes and inaccuracies affect the distance of the image of the image.

2. ## In this experiment I will be investigating the efficiency of a motor. I hope ...

and the image distance (v), to two different converging lenses. I will do this by planning out how I will conduct the experiment: * Clear the work top * Setup the power supply and connect the ray box * Blue - Tack the metre rule to the work top, making

1. ## Investigating the Positioning of Real Images formed by a Convex Lens.

Subsequently I may repeat the experiment using several lenses. If I do this I will keep u fixed, in order to discover the dependant of v and f. 11. Equipment choice for precise data * I will have use a white screen, not lined or graph paper, this will ensure

2. ## My experiments focus is to obtain an accurate measurement for a specific lenss power.

Second Experiment * Power pack set to 9 volts * Using LED * Distance the U value decreases per stage is 25mm U (x10-3 M) +/- 1 1/U (Dioptres) V Minimum (x10-3 M) V Maximum (x10-3 M) V Mean (x10-3 M) V +/- (x10-3 M) %V +/- 1/V Min. (D)

1. ## Lenses experiment

I know that once that I have chosen which lens I want, I cannot change half way through the experiment without retaking the result that I already have with the new lens. It is crucial for my lens to stay the same and for my object to be the same

2. ## Proving the lens formula.

To do this I will set-up the apparatus as shown in the diagram of apparatus, And I have chosen to make the Object and the lamp a constant position, due to the wires etc and difficulty of shifting it about all the time.

1. ## Lenses - experiment plan

knowing what the effect of a breakage is and what to do about it. When these breakages occur they can be on minor scale or a disastrous scale. This depends whether the glass is shatters or breaks in to jagged pieces, most lab breakages are on a minor scale and can simply be swept up by using a brush.

2. ## Relationship Between U and V For a Convex Lens

To see which images were best produced over different u distances. RESULTS LENS Average v(cm) RED (small) 29.6 YELLOW (small) 14.6 BLUE (fat) - (too small) YELLOW (fat) - (too small) We decided to choose the RED lens, because it gave a reasonable image distance.

• Over 160,000 pieces
of student written work
• Annotated by
experienced teachers
• Ideas and feedback to