• Join over 1.2 million students every month
• Accelerate your learning by 29%
• Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month
Page
1. 1
1
2. 2
2
3. 3
3
4. 4
4
5. 5
5
6. 6
6
7. 7
7
8. 8
8
9. 9
9
10. 10
10

The strength of an electromagnet.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

THE STRENGTH OF AN ELECTROMAGNET.

Christopher Hampton

Physics GCSE coursework

Class 11L

Introduction.

The object of this project is to plan and carry out a simple, fair, controlled and safe experiment to determine the factors that control the strength of an electromagnet. I know from previous years work that the strength of an electromagnet is determined by the number of coils of wire used, by the amount of current fed through the wires and that by putting a piece of iron or steel in the middle of the coil that the strength is increased.

In this project I will investigate the pattern by which changing the amount of current flowing through the coil will change the strength of the electromagnet. I will need to make the experiment fair, simple, reproducible and safe.  I will use the ability of an electromagnet to pick up a metal object as the measure of its strength. A panel pin is a small nail that is made of metal and so will be attracted to a magnet. The number of panel pins the electromagnet could lift is therefore a measure of magnetic strength and as panel pins are small it would be better to weigh the amount lifted, although it would also be possible to count the number lifted.

Middle

63

31

40

188

14

142

47

50

247

17

201

52

From these results you can clearly see that when iron is used as the core material a stronger electromagnet results when there is a current flowing in the circuit. A steel core results in a less strong electromagnet. The iron core does stay magnetized after the current is switched off but to a much lesser degree that a steel core. Thus a steel core results in a weaker electromagnet that stays magnetized to a much greater extent after the current has been switched off. The reason for this is that the domains in iron are more freely mobile than in the steel alloy. In iron when the current flows all the domains line up and increase the power of the magnet a lot, but then they are free to return to an almost random pattern when the current stops flowing. In the steel core it is more difficult for the domains to line up with the current, so the amplification of the magnetic power is less, but when the current is switched off it is more difficult for the domains to move and many of them remain lined up, leaving an residual magnetic effect that retains more of the panel pins. This

Conclusion

The experiment could be improved by taking more readings at each point. This would increase the accuracy of the average readings. Also you could use a new set of panel pins for each experiment so that they do not get magnetized and so give a slight over-reading. It would also be possible to completely demagnetize the iron core between each experiment, because although the residual magnetism is less with iron than steel, there is still some residual effect that will carry over from one reading to the next. The temperature control was not prefect. The magnet and coil tended to warm up when the power was on and then cool down when it was turned off. It would have been better if the temperature was constant throughout. Finally you could use a different type of weight such as iron filings, to prevent dropping of the pins before weighing them. Iron filings weigh less per individual piece so may give a more accurate result, although they are difficult to use because they are so light and may be worse. Another preliminary experiment would answer this question.

Varying the number of coils, while keeping the current the same, could extend the experiment. Also the relationship could be tested at greater currents to see if the relationship hold true as the power is increased. Finally you could keep the current and number of coils the same and vary the size of the iron core.

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Electrical & Thermal Physics section.

Found what you're looking for?

• Start learning 29% faster today
• 150,000+ documents available
• Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
• Join over 1.2 million students every month
• Accelerate your learning by 29%
• Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Related AS and A Level Electrical & Thermal Physics essays

1. Thermistor Coursework

Next I took my reading of the potential difference across the thermistor. I suspect that if I had to correct the potential difference of the lab pack, the temperature of the water could have dropped by roughly about 1°C by the time I came to read the potential difference across the thermistor.

2. Objective: To use a search coil and a CRO to investigate the magnetic ...

When placing the search coil along the length of the solenoid, the induced e.m.f. shown on the CRO is quite uniform except near its two ends. Current I/A 0.01 0.02 0.03 0.04 0.05 0.06 Induced e.m.f.(V)/mV 1.4 2.8 3.4 4.2 6 6.6 p Stretched length (l )

1. investigating the relationship between the diameter and the current in a wire at its ...

Units on axes The trend line on the graph shows that the relationship between versus resistance is similar to that stated earlier. The line doesn't quite cut the origin but this appears to be due to uncertainties and rounding errors.

2. Aim: To investigate the factors affecting the e.m.f. induced in a coil due ...

The reading of the light-beam galvanometer was recorded. Current (I) = 2.4A 23. The time taken for the complete removal of the small solenoid from the large solenoid was measured and recorded by a stop watch. The procedures were repeated 4 times and the mean time was taken.

1. Sensors Project Report

Voltage/V Number of papers (Sensor) Number of papers (actual) 1.74 15 16 3.32 21 21 4.41 36 37 4.98 53 54 5.23 76 75 Evaluation Reliability and Accuracy The sensor is quite reliable because it produces quite an accurate calibration.

2. investigating the relationship between the diameter and the current in a wire at its ...

Copper wire 24swg - 30cm wire (0.3m) - 29.9cm 1.5Volts (dc) Ammeter - 0.2A Testwire - 30.cm Voltmeter - 0.2V 1.5Volts (dc) Ammeter - 0-200 mA Voltmeter - 0.200 mV A = 0.043A V = 11.3mV Resistance = 0.255 ? V = 11.3mV = 0.0113V V = R = 0.262890689 ?

1. resistivity if a nichrome wire

Voltage 1 (Volts) Voltage 2 (Volts) Voltage 3 (Volts) Average voltage (Volts) Current (Amps) Resistance (ohms) R=V/I 0.100m 0.200m 0.300m 0.400m 0.500m 0.600m 0.700m 0.800m 0.900m 1.000m I will then plot a scatter graph of the relationship between length and resistance. The length will be on the x-axis and the resistance will be displayed on the y-axis.

2. Resistance of a wire

RESULTS Current in Amps (A) Length (mm) Voltage (V) Repeat #1 Repeat #2 Repeat #3 Average of Current (A) Resistance (ohms) 00 3.0 4.15 4.16 4.30 4.20 0.71 50 3.0 2.33 2.44 2.35 2.73 1.09 100 3.0 1.79 1.80 1.93 1.84 1.63 150 3.0 1.39 1.45 1.45 1.43 2.09 200 3.0 1.30 1.25 1.19 1.24 2.41 250

• Over 160,000 pieces
of student written work
• Annotated by
experienced teachers
• Ideas and feedback to