• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

The Use of Recombinant DNA Technology Can Only Benefit Humans - "Recombinant DNA is DNA that has been mixed with that of another species"

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

The Use of Recombinant DNA Technology Can Only Benefit Humans "Recombinant DNA is DNA that has been mixed with that of another species" The development of recombinant DNA technology is, in biological terms a very recent discovery. It was founded in 1973 by Cohen and Boyer, the first two scientists to successfully transplant a section of DNA from one bacterium and insert it into another using restriction enzymes, creating the first transgenic organism1. As with every biological discovery the most pertinent question is, who or what can it benefit? The use of recombinant DNA technology is undoubtedly of huge medical and industrial benefit to humans. It facilitates the use of bacteria to rapidly produce enzymes, proteins and hormones needed to cure illness or for use in vaccination. It also allows the development of a faster more reliable alternative to the artificial selection used by farmers in the past to improve stock and so provide economic benefits to humans. More radically there are possibilities to alter antigens on animal organs to enable them to be transplanted into humans. It is therefore true that humans will be large benefactors of this new technology. However, the human race is essentially a mammalian species, and so surely the vaccinations and other medical advances can be applied to a large range of other mammals. ...read more.

Middle

However, with the use of genetic markers it is becoming easier to produce proteins, hormones and enzymes using bacteria. This has in a number of cases given rise to the production of large quantities of relatively cheap vaccinations for use in veterinary medicine. Such vaccinations have been used not only in agriculture and other animal industries (which would mainly benefit humans), but also for the care of both domesticated pets and endangered species. Hence, despite research costs, it is not only humans who are benefiting from recombinant DNA technology. A survey carried out in 1997 for New Scientist magazine claimed that of all the currently practiced uses for recombinant DNA technology, 58% were medical, agricultural or food processing uses (i.e. for human benefit), 5% were used for environmental benefits (i.e. for cleaning contaminated land to protect wildlife) and 37% were put to "other" uses including animal care and preservation of endangered species. So, it is seemingly proven that recombinant DNA technology does not only benefit humans, but can benefit other organisms and indeed whole ecosystems. There are ethical issues that both support and undermine the title of this essay. There are suggestions that because of moral disagreements, this technology should be saved only for medical use, and not be used for other reasons, which would directly prevent any other species from benefiting. ...read more.

Conclusion

This is a currently a major stumbling block in the potential human benefit recombinant DNA technology could provide. It would seem that much evidence exists to suggest that the sphere of recombinant DNA technology is vast and beneficial to not only a diverse range of species but also a multitude of ecosystems. However, still very much in its infancy, it seems that recombinant DNA technology will only currently be used if it is of medical, economical or social benefit to humans. Ironically for all other species of animal that can, but for the moment do not, benefit from this technology, it seems that only by using other organisms can humans benefit. In conclusion, I believe that given all the evidence it is a little narrow-minded to believe that in the long run the only benefactors of recombinant DNA technology will be humans. However, until sufficient research and testing has been accomplished I do feel that humans will certainly form the overwhelming majority of beneficiaries. It would seem contradictory to thousands of years of evolutionary theory if humans did not use their discoveries primarily for their own benefit. Perhaps it is a good thing if, until this technology is fully proven to be safe, we do keep it to ourselves. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Genetics, Evolution & Biodiversity section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Genetics, Evolution & Biodiversity essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    MENTAL HEALTH

    4 star(s)

    Movies, television and boohttp://www.cmha.ca/bins/content_page.asp?cid=3) A report by the mental health charity mind says that media coverage has a direct impact on the lives of people diagnosed with psychiatric disorders. (http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/health/635415.stm) Television, radio and newspaper play an essential role in the public perception of mental illness.

  2. The Biology of Autistic Spectrum Disorder and the Social Implications

    the use of medication can help to ease the symptoms of disorders that occur, resulting from having ASD, such as attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. (ADHD) It has already been mentioned that symptoms are grouped as: * Social interaction- When a child may seem distant or detached * Communication- Not being

  1. Recombinant DNA, genetically engineered DNA prepared in vitro by cutting up DNA molecules and ...

    The reason is that so long as DNA can direct the making of protein enzymes, no other direction is necessary because enzymes aid in the building of all other cell molecules. Most of the details of protein synthesis have been omitted from this discussion so that key events could be stressed.

  2. Cell Theory - Discuss the theory that living organisms are composed of cells.

    Carbohydrates are the main energy storage molecules in plants, starches being the most common. Lipids are more commonly used by animals, thought most do store a limited amount of energy in the form of carbohydrates. This makes sense for animals, which tend to be more mobile, because lipids are much more concentrated form of energy than carbohydrates.

  1. Free essay

    Outline the impact on the evolution of plants and animals of: ...

    * Process and analyse information from secondary sources to explain a modern example of 'natural' selection: * Some organisms, such as bacteria and insects, produce large numbers of offspring. Amongst large numbers of bacteria offspring, some individuals may carry genes that give them resistance to antibiotics.

  2. HIV & AIDS

    There has been no evidence that casual contact has or ever will transmit the disease. This is were many social problems come into effect. Many be tend to isolate people that they know have contracted the virus because they are ignorant to how the disease is transmitted.

  1. Explain how DNA fingerprinting works.

    Children with the syndrome may have frequent tantrums and difficulties paying attention. They often experience anxiety and depression and are overwhelmed by what is going on around them. The symptoms tend to be a lot more severe for males than for females.

  2. Chromosomes and DNA

    * The expected 50:50 ratio of males and females only shows up when large numbers of fertilisations are involved. The composition of DNA DNA stands for deoxyribonucleic acid. Chromosomes are made of DNA. DNA is a very large molecule (polymer)

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work