• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

This experiment is designed to approximate ì, the coefficient of friction, for two surfaces. We used a piece of rubber on the bottom of a wooden block on a wooden table.

Extracts from this document...


Mechanics Coursework

This is experiment is designed to approximate μ, the coefficient of friction, for two surfaces. We used a piece of rubber on the bottom of a wooden block on a wooden table.


To undertake this experiment, first I developed an equation allowing a straight line to be plotted from our results. This will test if Coulomb’s law is correct. The main assumptions made in this experiment are:

1. Acceleration is constant

2. The strings are light and inextensible, and the pulley is light and smooth

3. g, gravity is 9.8

4. Coulomb’s law is correct

5. There is no air resistance

6. F=ma

These assumptions have different weights in affecting our results. Some are more likely to affect our results, whilst others will only have a small effect.


How strong the effect is on results

Acceleration is constant

This will have a moderate effect on the results. We can see that the acceleration is not constant. This is because friction does change slightly with velocity, and we are ignoring air resistance

Light, inextensible strings

In fact the strings do stretch slightly, and do have a small weight. This will affect the results as forces will not be constant during the experiment, and therefore produce irregular acceleration.

Light, smooth pulley

This will affect the results in the same way as above. We attempted to use the smoothest pulley available, but obviously it can never be perfectly smooth. That the pulley has mass does not affect our results, as we are not dependent on the pulleys mass for our results.

Gravity is 9.8

This will introduce a systematic error into our calculations, but as we will use this assumption for both the results and the model, it will not make a difference for our experiment.

Coulomb’s law is correct

This will make a big difference to our results. By assuming that image02.png, our calculations are fairly simple. However, this linear model is incorrect. This will affect our results considerably, and may results in a curve being plotted from our results instead of a straight line.

No air resistance

This will have a mild effect on the results. Because the block of wood and the weights are fairly small, the effects of air resistance are negligible. However there will be a small effect, which again may force the results into a curve rather than a straight line.


This assumption will not impact our results very much at all. For macroscopic objects, such as we are dealing with, this law is a very good model. However if we were to repeat the experiment using single atoms for the objects, this would be a bad model.

...read more.


                                            (2) image22.png


(3) image24.png

Using image25.png(Coulomb’s Law)

(4) image26.png

Substituting equation 4 into equation 1


Substituting into equation 3



Assuming constant acceleration (see note above)


As image07.png


Substituting into equation 5


The two variables will be m1 and t. By putting image10.png, we can cancel m2 from the equation.





...read more.


Revision of the process

To improve the experiment, it would be better to use light gates to improve accuracy for timing. On the results that we collected, the higher speeds resulted in wider error bounds and thus less accuracy. This is because it was a lot harder to accurately measure these fast times. Measuring the distances we were moving over more accurately would also increase accuracy, as would more accurate measurement of mass. However, accuracy is not the main issue in this experiment. For this experiment, it seems that our model is incorrect, rather than the results.

To improve this experiment, our assumptions need to be changed. Most assumptions are fine, but the assumption of Coulombs law is very inaccurate. This assumption of a linear relationship forced our results into a curve. To achieve a more meaningful analysis of these results, we need a better model on which to compare them. However, more accurate models for friction are much more complex and far less simple to use.

...read more.

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Mechanics & Radioactivity section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Mechanics & Radioactivity essays

  1. Force of Friction experiment

    Use the same face of the wooden block. Repeat step 2 to 5. C. Effect of surface area on friction 7. Place the wooden blocks onto the wooden plank side by side instead of piling up. Then connect them to the spring balance and move the trolley until they slide.

  2. Flywheel experiment

    = 13.49x10-3 Nm To calculate Tf (frictional torque); Tf = mg (H1 - H2)/? = (0.1 x 9.81 x 0.77)/ 56 = 1.35x10-2 Nm To calculate the angular acceleration (?); ? = 2H1/ (r x t2) = (2 x 0.98)/ (13.75x10-3 x 22.882)

  1. Perform an experiment on friction and the variables of friction using a wooden block, ...

    I predict that as the weight on the block increases so therefore does the down force, increasing the amount of friction because it becomes more difficult for the ridges to pass over each and so a block with less/smoother ridges would find its passage a lot easier.

  2. Investigating the factors affecting tensile strength of human hair.

    The more melanin in your hair, the darker it will get. An amino acid called tyrosine is converted into melanin so the hair will have colour. First, the body's blood vessels carry tyrosine to the bottom of each hair follicle.

  1. Free essay

    CIRCULAR MOTION - revision notes and calculations

    The centripetal force changes only the direction of the motion but not it's magnitude, therefore, the speed V is constant. (d) (1) One student holds the glass tube vertically and whirls the bung around above his head, and the speed of the bung is increased until the marker is just below the tube.

  2. The aim of this investigation is to investigate the effect of adding varying weights ...

    Results/Evidence: The experiment was carried out and three sets of results were taken for each quantity of weight and an average was taken for each set of three results. The results are shown in the table on the following page: This table can be summarised by these three graphs that

  1. Investigating the Inverse Square Law

    Method: 1. Clamp the G-M tube to one end of the optical bench and attach it to the input socket of the scaler 2. Set the variable EHT voltage on the scaler at a minimum and turn it on, allowing a few minutes for the scaler to warm up 3.

  2. Charles's Law

    This will hopefully obtain a good set of results. In order to simplify this experiment, air resistance has been ignored as a factor in the range of the projectile. As it is a projectile that will be measured, the only other factor working on it are gravitational forces. The horizontal motion of the projectile is independent of the vertical

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work