• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

To investigate the relationship between the distance between a lens and an object, and the distance a screen must be from the lens in order that it displays a focused image of that object on the screen.

Extracts from this document...



“An investigation into the factors affecting a lens.”

Aim: To investigate the relationship between the distance between a lens and an object, and the distance a screen must be from the lens in order that it displays a focused image of that object on the screen.

Background knowledge:

In order to plan and my investigation, I am going to research the different types of lenses and the factors affecting them, and their uses. I hope that this will help me to plan and carry out a more successful investigation, and also help me formulate a hypothesis and understand my results better.

Lenses are optical devices that affect the passage of light through them by refraction. They can be made from almost any transparent materials, but the most common is glass. Lenses are used extensively in optical instruments such as cameras, telescopes and all sorts of projectors.

There are two main types of lens, convex (converging), and concave (diverging). Convex lenses are thicker in the centre, thinning out towards the edges, while concave lenses have thick edges and thin centres. A concave lens will refract light inwards, thus creating a smaller image while a convex lens will do the opposite, creating a larger image.

All lenses have an optical centre, where light can pass without being refracted and the principal axis of the lens passes though this point. At this point on the lens, the glass (or other material) is flat on both sides of the lens.

...read more.


Close object:

Distant object:

Prediction: I can use the following formula, which relates to my hypothesis, to generate a set of predicted results for my experiment. This is a quantitative prediction:

1/v = 1/f – 1/u

v =  the distance between the lens and the image.

f =  the focal length of the lens.

u = the distance between the lens and the object.

In order to use this formula I need to know the values of f and u. For between the lens and the object I will use the lengths listed below– these are the u values for this experiment. I know the focal length of my lens, 10cm – this is my f value.

u” values                                “f” value

11cm                                  10cm





Using the formula I gained the following predicted v values for a lens with a focal length of 10cm, using the u values shown above.

U value (cm)


V value (cm)
















Using these forecast results, I will now plot a graph comparing the u value with the v value.

This graph shows a smooth curve, demonstrating a negative correlation between the length of u and that of v. This supports my hypothesis. I will now conduct an experiment to investigate my theory further.


  • Ruler
  • Screen of thick white paper
  • Photographic slide (as object)
  • Lens (focal length of 10cm)
  • Lens stand
  • Clamp stand
  • Power pack
  • Ray box

Set-up diagram:

Method: I will set up equipment as shown above and then adjust the distance between the screen and the lens until the image shown on the screen is as clear as possible.

I will record the v

...read more.


Although I took care to blackout the room I was working in, the light intensity could still vary, both in the background light and also in the light source. I could use a darkroom and light sensors to measure the amounts of light at various points and to make sure that they are all zero. I could also use a sensor to measure the level of light emitted from the source and have a computer automatically adjust it so that the level is constant. A good quality bulb and a steady controlled power source would also be necessary to prevent varying light intensity from the source. Laser light could also be used and would be easier to measure and with computer instruments.

Despite this scope for inaccuracies, the investigation turned up no anomalies and the quality of the evidence is good. I think that the evidence gained from this supports both my hypothesis but the experiment could be repeated with better equipment (mentioned above) and a wider range of lengths. I could also repeat the experiment varying the angle of the lens, and the focal length of the lens to see if they have an effect on the images produced and if so, what the effects are.

Danny Smith 11B

...read more.

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Microscopes & Lenses section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Microscopes & Lenses essays

  1. Peer reviewed

    Physics coursework; Finding the focal length of a lens using a graphical method.

    4 star(s)

    the 1metre ruler is only correct to the nearest mm meaning that is as precise as I can make my measurements, and the marks defining mm's on the ruler are quite thick in comparison to the spaces in between them, in the same way, the measurements of v are based

  2. Measurement of the focal lengths of a concave lens and a convex mirror ...

    The distance x between the centres of the lens and the mirror was then measured. 7. Step 1 and 2 were repeated by using a different initial position of the lens. 4 more sets of values of d and x were obtained and the results were tabulated.

  1. Investigating the relationship between the image distance and the object distance for a convex ...

    Measure the bulb filament in the reflection. 6. Record down the measurements. 7. Repeat each time, making sure to decrease the object distance. ==> OBTAINING EVIDENCE RESULTS TABLE Object Distance (cm) Image Distance (cm) Size of Object (cm) Size of Image (cm)

  2. Investigating the factors which Affect the image formed by a Convex lens

    This method of finding the focus point was very inaccurate and probably was the reason for the difference in the actual and theoretical results. How ever, I can work out the actually focus of the lens by using the same formula and some of my results: 1 + 1 =

  1. In this experiment I will be investigating the efficiency of a motor. I hope ...

    0.9 = 0.63 0.63 / 5.24 = 0.120336116 x 100 = 12.02 0.8 1.29 4.56 1.1.00 2.0.96 3.0.92 Average: 0.96 1.29 x 4.56 x 0.96 = 5.647104 = 5.65 0.8 x 0.9 = 0.72 0.72 / 5.65 = 0.12749898 x 100 = 12.74 0.9 1.29 4.56 1.1.01 2.1.05 3.1.02 Average:

  2. To investigate the relationship between u and v for a convex lens.

    There is not a wide range of results. For a focal length of 10 centimetres u v 20 20.7 100 10.2 The image is bigger than when the focal length was 5 centimetres but it is still too small. The image is also clearer but is still too blurred.

  1. Investigating the Positioning of Real Images formed by a Convex Lens.

    This can later be developed, fixed and used in printing a photograph. We have to look carefully at a camera to work out how it gets the rays to a focus at a particular point, and where that point is.

  2. Finding the Focal Length of a Lens.

    As I found out in the pre-test, different coloured light has different focal lengths. The speed of light in any specific medium is constant. As the wave equation says: v - Velocity � - Frequency ? - Wavelength and the frequency of light didn't change, or at least not a

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work