• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

To investigate the resistance of a conducting material as its length changes.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Christopher de Wardt                                                         Dulwich College

Physics Coursework 2002

Planning

Introduction

Aim: To investigate the resistance of a conducting material as its length changes.

        I am carrying out this experiment to find out if as a result of changing the length of a conducting material – graphite paper in my case, the resistance changes directly because of this change. In order to make sure that the results, leading to further conclusions, are reliable, I must make sure that any other factors that could possibly affect resistance are kept constant.

Variable Studied - Length

        I will be using a circuit method in this investigation; there are a number of different factors that I must take into account when investigating the resistance of the graphite paper. Obviously, the first is length, which I will decrease from its starting length in equal steps as it approaches zero centimetres long; this is the main variable being considered in my investigation. The width of the paper must also be kept constant, as it may affect the results, and causing the investigation to become unfair.  To evaluate the resistance of the graphite paper I will record my observations in terms of voltage across the paper and the current of the circuit. Because

...read more.

Middle

20

3.35

30

3.29

40

3.24

50

3.19

60

3.14

70

3.09

80

3.05

image10.png

Conclusion of preliminary experiment:

As the maximum temperature change of the lab environment is only likely to be around a few degrees at the very most, my results suggest that the decrease of accuracy of my main experiment will be very small. For example, my graph shows that if there was a change of temperature from 20ºC to 22ºC in the lab, the accuracy of my results would 0.012kΩ too high, which would be a percentage error of around +0.36%. Therefore, in the context of this experiment, temperature will have almost no effect on the reliability of my results in the lab environment.

Method of main experiment

Apparatus:

                • 2 Volt cyclon cell

                • Analogue ammeter

                • Digital voltmeter

                • 45 cm strip of graphite-coated paper

                • Rheostat (potential divider)

                • Circuit wires

                • Modified Bulldog clips (2)

image06.png

The circuit should be assembled as shown above; the slide on the rheostat should always be adjusted so that the digital voltmeter reads 1 volt.

The current should be recorded for the following lengths of graphite paper:

Voltage/V

Length/cm

1

45

1

40

1

35

1

30

1

25

1

20

1

15

1

10

1

5

As shown in the table, and as I wrote earlier, voltage must be kept constant to make this a fair experiment. Also, the width of the graphite paper must be kept constant throughout the experiment – easily done by simply using the same piece of graphite paper cut to shorter and shorter lengths.

...read more.

Conclusion

-1 and as voltage was kept constant at 1 Volt in this experiment, effectively R=I-1. Because of this, and the line of best fit seems to suggest a ‘squared’ relationship, I believe a graph showing resistance against length would show a direct proportionality.

image12.png

        This graph shows that Resistance increases with length; it shows that resistance is directly proportional to length. Specifically for my width of graphite paper it shows that R= ~70*length. The fact that resistance has been shown to be directly proportional to length - in this case - fully supports my prediction.

This allows me to conclude that the scientific basis for my prediction was sound, and that the number of collisions between electrons and atom sites determines the value of resistance in a conductor.

Evaluation

        As I found that my results fell in line with previous scientific knowledge, it suggests that my experiment was carried out accurately, and that the use of repeat readings is a good way of getting closer to the ‘ideal’ values which previous scientific study suggests I should be finding. The accuracy of my results also shows that my conclusions have a firm basis; by comparing my own personal results with others carrying out similar experiments, they seem to be similar enough to ensure that they are accurate. In order to make sure these results are reliable, even further amounts of readings could be taken using different sets of equipment to ensure that the experiment remains fair.

...read more.

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Electrical & Thermal Physics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Electrical & Thermal Physics essays

  1. Thermistor Coursework

    I think that this could be the source of any anomalous results, such as the results for 10°C and 25°C. Another reason for there being anomalous results is that the sensor unit didn't have enough time to stabilise before I took my reading.

  2. Investigating the effect of 'length' on the resistance of a wire

    More than 4.5V (three batteries) would make the wire too hot and at lengths below 30cm it would burn (which was what happened during the preliminary test). Fair test (control variables): * I will make sure that I use the same material of wire for the investigation, with the same cross-sectional area.

  1. I am going to investigate what the resistivity is of a pencil lead. ...

    If the length is increased so is the resistance as there are more positive ions to obstruct the electrons (current). The best way to achieve this is to do the whole experiment with the same pencil lead. I will also make sure that the diameter remains the same by using the same piece of lead.

  2. Investigating how temperature affects the resistance in a wire

    In fact I think there was a certain random element in the results that contributed to the inaccuracy of the results. Because of the inaccuracy of the results, I feel that it is not a good idea to use these results as a basis for any conclusions, especially as these conclusions cannot be backed up by any scientific knowledge.

  1. The aim of the experiment is to verify the maximum power theorem and investigate ...

    2 The scale of the spring balance was set properly to zero. 3 The sand paper was placed on the table. 4 A wooden block was placed on the table. 5 The wooden block was connected to the spring balance in series.

  2. physics sensor coursework

    Light intensity/ lux Potential difference/ V Current/ mA Resistance/ ohms 0 13.18 1.07 12 317.76 100 9.76 7.94 1229.22 200 8.02 12.58 637.52 300 7.16 13.22 541.60 400 6.75 16.44 410.58 500 5.92 17.32 341.80 600 5.23 18.06 289.59 700 5.02 18.33 273.87 800 4.14 18.92 218.82 900 4.16 18.78

  1. To investigate the effects of two different variables on a solar cell output.

    Factors: When carrying out these experiments, I will make sure the only variables that vary are the ones that I am testing, and the others are kept constant. For the first experiment when I am keeping the distance between the lamp and solar cell constant and when I am varying

  2. To find which of the circuits, shown below, are most suitable to measure a ...

    Pd across resistor (and ammeter), from Ohms Law = V = IR V = (1 x 10-4) x 90 V = 0.009V Total resistance calculated from meter readings, from Ohms law = = 90? For 50000?: Current through Resistor (and therefore the ammeter also)

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work