What is DNA?

Authors Avatar

10B        Tofeek Jumaily        01/11/07

DNA

DNA, otherwise known as deoxyribonucleic acid has changed our lives, including our perception of life, by both scientists and the average person. Science has developed dramatically due to the discovery of DNA.

DNA was first discovered by the Swiss physician Friedrich Miescher and Gregor Mendel who, in 1869, discovered a microscopic substance in the pus of discarded surgical bandages. As it resided in the nuclei of cells, he called it "nuclein". In 1919 this discovery was followed by Phoebus Levene's identification of the base, sugar and phosphate nucleotide unit. Levene suggested that DNA consisted of a string of nucleotide units linked together through the phosphate groups. However, Levene thought the chain was short and the bases repeated in a fixed order. In 1937 William Astbury produced the first X-ray diffraction patterns that showed that DNA had a regular structure.

In 1943, Oswald Theodore Avery discovered that traits of the "smooth" form of the Pneumococcus could be transferred to the "rough" form of the same bacteria by mixing killed "smooth" bacteria with the live "rough" form. Avery, along with coworkers Colin MacLeod and Maclyn McCarty, identified DNA as this transforming principle.DNA's role in heredity was confirmed in 1953, when Alfred Hershey and Martha Chase in the Hershey-Chase experiment showed that DNA is the genetic material of the T2 phage.

In 1953, based on X-ray diffraction images taken by Rosalind Franklin and the information that the bases were paired, James D. Watson and Francis Crick suggested what is now accepted as the first accurate model of DNA structure in the journal Nature. Experimental evidence for Watson and Crick's model were published in a series of five articles in the same issue of Nature Of these, Franklin and Raymond Gosling's paper was the first publication of X-ray diffraction data that supported the Watson and Crick model, this issue also contained an article on DNA structure by Maurice Wilkins and his colleagues. In 1962, after Franklin's death, Watson, Crick, and Wilkins jointly received the Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine. However, speculation continues on who should have received credit for the discovery, as it was based on Franklin's data.

In an influential presentation in 1957, Crick laid out the "Central Dogma" of molecular biology, which foretold the relationship between DNA, RNA, and proteins, and articulated the "adaptor hypothesis". Final confirmation of the replication mechanism that was implied by the double-helical structure followed in 1958 through the Meselson-Stahl experiment. Further work by Crick and coworkers showed that the genetic code was based on non-overlapping triplets of bases, called codons, allowing Har Gobind Khorana, Robert W. Holley and Marshall Warren Nirenberg to decipher the genetic code. These findings represent the birth of molecular biology.

We often talk about people inheriting certain characteristics. ‘John has inherited his father’s blue eyes’. We expect tall parents to have tall children. The inheritance of such characteristics is called heredity and the branch of biology which studies how heredity works is called genetics. Genetics also tries to show what sort of offspring is likely to be produced when plants or animals reproduce sexually.

Join now!

In sexual reproduction, a new organism starts life as a single cell called a zygote. The instructions that dictated which cells were to become liver, or muscle or bone must all have been present in this first cell. To understand how these ‘instructions’ are passed from cell to cell, what is important is that when the zygote divides and produces an organism consisting of thousands of cells. This type of cell division is called mitosis. It does not take place only in a zygote but occurs in all growing tissues.

Mitosis

When a cell is not dividing, there is not ...

This is a preview of the whole essay

Here's what a star student thought of this essay

My only negative comments on this piece are on the level of English portrayed in the piece. You clearly have shown your intelligence, but the short sentences and lack of flow between some sentences lets you down. If you restructure your sentences a bit more, and rebuild a sentence rather than tacking an extra bit on the end, it will read a lot better and make the piece look far more sophisticated.

Technical language is used extensively throughout the piece, but is sparse enough to make the piece readable. Pictures and facts are used to support structured points which are developed throughout, as well as explained to demonstrate your understanding. I would either remove or rewrite the final conclusion, as it seems very informal, in contrast to the rest of the piece and seems to lower the tone slightly, which is a shame as this is an intelligent piece, as you have shown you understand the topic, as well as related information in the syllabus, such as meiosis and mitosis.

Overall, this is a very good piece, with clear understanding of the topic, with lots of facts and explanations showing understanding of what you are talking about. There is a good explanation and history of DNA, with appropriate facts, as well as a good expansion on the topic with information on replication with meiosis and mitosis as well, which helps demonstrate your knowledge of the entire syllabus, but is not out of place on the topic of DNA, as it adds more information over and above what is expected. Images also help accompany the detailed explanation and are well placed within the piece.