Why do they put mint in toothpaste? Would garlic be better?

Authors Avatar

Why do they put mint in toothpaste?

Would garlic be better?

In this practical I have to investigate the antibacterial properties of plants. Plants are susceptible to infection by bacteria and fungi; they do everything to repel such attacks. Several plants are known to, pr thought to, destroy and inhibit the growth of certain bacteria. A plant with this property is known as antibacterial.

Chemicals in their cells are toxic to bacteria or interfere with their metabolism in some other way. Mint may numb our gums but would garlic be better? In this activity I will investigate whether the two plants contain antibacterial chemicals and their effectiveness by looking at the growth of bacteria on agar plates.

Hypothesis

I already know from reading in the text book that both garlic and mint have antibacterial properties. I believe that garlic will have a larger inhibition zone than the mint one because garlic is also used as a natural antibiotic and has been said that garlic is approximately one per cent as potent an antibiotic as penicillin.

Join now!

Equipment

Agar plates seeded with bacteria

Plant material (garlic cloves and mint leaves)

Pestle and mortar

10cm3 industrial methylated spirits

Pipette (sterile)

Paper discs (e.g.  Whatman antibiotic assay paper discs)

Sterile Petri dish

Sterile forceps

Tape

Marker pen

Incubator set at 25⁰C

Method

  1. The agar plates had already been seeded and left to set for an hour before our practical by the school science technician.
  2. We crushed 3g of a garlic glove using the pestle and mortar and 3g of mint leaves using a clean pestle and mortar. We added 10cm3 of industrial methylated spirit and mixed ...

This is a preview of the whole essay

Here's what a star student thought of this essay

Avatar

Grammar is incorrect in places and this interrupts the flow of some sentences. Incorrect working is used in some places.

Science behind the experiment could be explained more clearly and in a bit more depth. For example by going into the mechanisms what make the plans antibacterial, and how this may affect our gums. The link to our gums is just thrown out there, and not really investigated by the candidate. The safety measures could also be improved by explaining in more depth why each technique was important to the success of the experiment. The conclusion given is adequate and goes into good scientific depth to explain the results found.

Overall a good basic response to the question. The introduction could have been improved by the methods said below, as could the main body of the text. The conclusion was adequate and showed good scientific depth to the response. To improve the experiment and their grade, the candidate could include graphs, could suggest improvements to the experiment, and calculate percentage errors for the equipment involved. The candidate could also consider any confounding factors and how they may have affected the experiment and how the candidate would address these.