• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Access the strengths and limitations of Subcultural Theories in explaining deviance.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Access the strengths and limitations of Subcultural Theories in explaining deviance. An official definition of deviance is rule-breaking behaviour of some kind, which fails to conform to the norms and expectations of a particular society or social group. Merton (1968) attempts to explain why deviance arises in the first place and by doing so develops functionalist theory. Merton suggested that our society has a shared consensus around social goals and approved means of achieving them. He says that most people share the same goals in life; we all want our own home and a nice car, a high income, holidays and possessing consumer goods. Most conform to the approved ways of achieving these goals, like getting a good education and then working in paid employment but, in an unequal society Merton argues that not all of us have the same opportunities to achieve these goals and can not conform to the approved mean of realizing them. These individuals face a sense of strain and anomie as their needs do not match up to the dominant rules about how to achieve success and so they respond to their situation in different 'modes of adaptation'. ...read more.

Middle

A weak spot in Cohen's theory is that he assumes that these mainstream goals are deemed to be desirable and greatly accepted by working-class youths and that there delinquent behavior is a response to the goals they can not achieve. Miller (1962) argues against this and suggests that the working-class have always had their own independent culture, and so they are neither rejecting mainstream values nor wanting revenge against society's goals, as they have never lived by or held them. Matza's (1964) study on delinquency found that most young people were not committed to delinquent values and instead accepted society's aims but drifted in and out of delinquency rather than showing commitment to the norms and values. Cohen's theory does though explain working-class delinquency as a group response and not just as individual's behavior, as with Merton's theory. Paul Willis (1979) argued that the creation of deviant sub-cultures amongst working class boys was not simply a response to such things as status denial. Such sub-cultures also represented an organised, realistic, attempt to come to terms with a wider cultural world that had already, by the time they had entered secondary school, earmarked the boys in Willis's study as "failures". ...read more.

Conclusion

collective values- Societies values can only be help firmly in place if people are reminded of the boundaries between right and wrong. A person going against these values and the consequences of their actions have the effect of reinforcing social control. Such events give the opportunity to condemn deviant behavior and, by punishing criminals, reassert the boundaries of acceptable behavior, and strengthen collective values. By enabling social change- without deviant behavior new ideas on how to deal with the delinquents would not develop, enabling society to progress and change. By acting as a 'safety valve'- Deviance can be a way of expressing anger and frustration at society, avoided wider and more serious challenges to social order. By acting as a warning device- Deviance can act as a warning as to more serious underlying problems in society. For example, drug addiction, high rates of suicide and truancy from school. Subcultural theories help to understand that most deviant acts are carried out as some kind of reaction to society's consensus goals and values, whether this is denial, frustration or revenge from unable to achieve success in the eyes of society. But these theories generally talk about male youths and fail to mention why women commit crime and the subcultures they create as wife, mother, and nurturer. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Crime & Deviance section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Crime & Deviance essays

  1. Sociological Theories on Crime and Deviance

    Conflict theory posits that the economic organisation of capitalist societies produces deviance and crime. The high rate of crime such as theft, robbery, prostitution, and drug selling are a result of the economic status of these groups. Rather than emphasising values and conformity as a source of deviance as do

  2. Evaluate Functionalist Theories of Crime and Deviance

    Tonnies's work could be criticized for taking society from an excessively macro-sociological view. It would be possible in this case to point at the existence of coexisting sub-cultures (communities within a city)

  1. Critically compare the three main theories of deviance and assess their strengths & weaknesses

    Evaluation of Merton 1. Taylor criticises Merton for failing to consider wider power relations in society - that is, who actually makes the laws and who benefits from them. 2. Merton assumes that there is a value consensus in American society and that people only because of structural strain in society.

  2. Compare and Contrast the Main Sociological Theories of Deviance.

    the work of Albert Cohen, writing in the mid 1950s (Delinquent Boys, The Culture of The Gang). Cohen was puzzled by the fact that most delinquent acts were not motivated by economic ends, for example, vandalism. His answer was that most delinquents are motivated by status frustration whereby they feel

  1. Compare and evaluate Subcultural theory and labelling theory

    Aaron Cicourel's (1976) study of police and probation officers in California shows this point clearly. Those who fitted more into the picture of being classed as delinquent where more than often charged with criminal offence. The ones that fit the picture come from broken homes, and low-income home, and also show a bad attitude towards authority and schooling.

  2. The Strengths and Limitations of Left Realism and Right Realism Theories in Explaining Crime ...

    Kinsey, Young and Lea believe that there are a number of flaws in policing and that the public have lost their confidence in the police, and are reluctant to notify the police of crimes (90% of solved crimes rely on public notification).

  1. Outline and Assess Subcultural Theories of Crime and Deviance

    and material prosperity, residents of the United States will be able to achieve their goals in life; for some this is the ability to achieve more material prosperity than would be possible in their country of origin; the chance for their children to get an education; or the freedom of life without class, gender, racial or religious discriminations.

  2. What have theories of deviance added to our understanding of crime? Why are there ...

    within a social structure is due to man's "imperious biological drives" not being restrained by social boundaries. Deviant impulses that break through social control must be biologically derived, with non-conformity seen as being "rooted in human nature". However, this does not provide any basis for determining non-biological conditions that induce deviance from the social norm.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work