• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Access the strengths and limitations of Subcultural Theories in explaining deviance.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Access the strengths and limitations of Subcultural Theories in explaining deviance. An official definition of deviance is rule-breaking behaviour of some kind, which fails to conform to the norms and expectations of a particular society or social group. Merton (1968) attempts to explain why deviance arises in the first place and by doing so develops functionalist theory. Merton suggested that our society has a shared consensus around social goals and approved means of achieving them. He says that most people share the same goals in life; we all want our own home and a nice car, a high income, holidays and possessing consumer goods. Most conform to the approved ways of achieving these goals, like getting a good education and then working in paid employment but, in an unequal society Merton argues that not all of us have the same opportunities to achieve these goals and can not conform to the approved mean of realizing them. These individuals face a sense of strain and anomie as their needs do not match up to the dominant rules about how to achieve success and so they respond to their situation in different 'modes of adaptation'. ...read more.

Middle

A weak spot in Cohen's theory is that he assumes that these mainstream goals are deemed to be desirable and greatly accepted by working-class youths and that there delinquent behavior is a response to the goals they can not achieve. Miller (1962) argues against this and suggests that the working-class have always had their own independent culture, and so they are neither rejecting mainstream values nor wanting revenge against society's goals, as they have never lived by or held them. Matza's (1964) study on delinquency found that most young people were not committed to delinquent values and instead accepted society's aims but drifted in and out of delinquency rather than showing commitment to the norms and values. Cohen's theory does though explain working-class delinquency as a group response and not just as individual's behavior, as with Merton's theory. Paul Willis (1979) argued that the creation of deviant sub-cultures amongst working class boys was not simply a response to such things as status denial. Such sub-cultures also represented an organised, realistic, attempt to come to terms with a wider cultural world that had already, by the time they had entered secondary school, earmarked the boys in Willis's study as "failures". ...read more.

Conclusion

collective values- Societies values can only be help firmly in place if people are reminded of the boundaries between right and wrong. A person going against these values and the consequences of their actions have the effect of reinforcing social control. Such events give the opportunity to condemn deviant behavior and, by punishing criminals, reassert the boundaries of acceptable behavior, and strengthen collective values. By enabling social change- without deviant behavior new ideas on how to deal with the delinquents would not develop, enabling society to progress and change. By acting as a 'safety valve'- Deviance can be a way of expressing anger and frustration at society, avoided wider and more serious challenges to social order. By acting as a warning device- Deviance can act as a warning as to more serious underlying problems in society. For example, drug addiction, high rates of suicide and truancy from school. Subcultural theories help to understand that most deviant acts are carried out as some kind of reaction to society's consensus goals and values, whether this is denial, frustration or revenge from unable to achieve success in the eyes of society. But these theories generally talk about male youths and fail to mention why women commit crime and the subcultures they create as wife, mother, and nurturer. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Crime & Deviance section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Crime & Deviance essays

  1. Sociological Theories on Crime and Deviance

    Like functionalist theory, conflict theory is a macro structural approach; that it, both theories look at the structure of society as a whole in developing explanations of deviant behaviour. Because some groups of people have access to fewer resources in capitalist society, they are forced into crime to sustain themselves.

  2. Evaluate Functionalist Theories of Crime and Deviance

    They claimed that the "zone of transition" or inner city had higher crime than others- due to what they termed "high human turnover" as migrant groups moved in and out. This led them to argue that crime was not a consequence of one group but a consequence of no single group being able to settle in properly.

  1. Assess the Strengths and Weaknesses of the Different Aims of Punishment

    an eye for an eye a tooth for a tooth. The idea being that the criminal must repay society that an injustice would be done if someone could inflict pain without having it inflicted upon him. Here retribution links in with the "utilitarian" theory as retribution also has a deterrent effect.

  2. Compare and evaluate Subcultural theory and labelling theory

    but with the recognition of certain learning difficulties such as ADHD, this enables children to gain more support that they need and not to be left out just because they cannot fit into the majority of the norms. I do not feel that either of these theories contradict nor criticize

  1. Critically compare the three main theories of deviance and assess their strengths & weaknesses

    Merton's theory exaggerates working class crime. 4. Taylor, Walton and Young (1973) argue that the theory cannot account for politically motivated crime where people break the law because of commitment to a cause. 5. Merton has been defended by Reiner (1984)

  2. Examine the similarities and differences between subcultural theory and strain theory as explanations of ...

    This suggests that the subcultural response to official statistics is not adequate. In addition Subcultural theories have been questioned on empirical grounds. Empey (1982) is critical of Cloward and Ohlin. He argues that delinquent boys tend to cross between the distinct subcultural divides which Cloward and Ohlin identify.

  1. Assess the usefulness of consensus theories for an understanding of crime and deviance in ...

    Strain in the lower classes happens more frequently than in middle to upper classes according to Merton. Frustration with the systems of society, or possibly economic need, is the probable main cause of strain driving these people to criminality in order to achieve their goals.

  2. What is a gang?

    Gangs that accept female gang members sometimes rape them as their initiation. Instead of a "jumping in," or sometimes following it, the new gang member must participate in a mission. This can be anything from stealing a car to engaging in a firefight with a rival gang.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work