• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Analyse explanations of crime and deviance and explain the importance of social order and social control

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

´╗┐Unit Title: Crime and Deviance Kayleigh Giles-Johnson Analyse explanations of crime and deviance and explain the importance of social order and social control In this essay we will be looking at the topic of crime and deviance, firstly defining what the two terms mean and looking at the difference between them, before analysing the importance of social order and social control. We will then look at why crime and deviance can occur even in a socially ordered society, analysing theories from different sociological perspectives in order to explain this. By definition, crime is behaviour that breaks the laws of a society, whilst deviance is behaviour that differs from the norms and values of a particular group or society (Swale J, 2007, p.131). Whilst crime is commonly deviant behaviour, deviant behaviour itself does not always include criminal activity. For example, robbing a bank is both criminal and deviant; however wearing a pair of knickers on your head is deviant but not necessarily a crime. Generally, most people do not take part in deviant or criminal behaviour for fear of being seen as abnormal or indecent by their society. Travis Hirschi?s Social Bonds Theory (1969), explains how the formation of attachment to family, friends and society in general can prevent deviant behaviour. ...read more.

Middle

However, this does not explain non-utilitarian crime such as vandalism. In contrast, subcultural theories say that crime and deviance is actually conformity for some groups in society; Albert Cohen (1955) said that working class boys, frustrated by lack of opportunities, joined or created groups with alternative cultural values, which tend to be the opposite of mainstream society, so deviant behaviour then becomes the norm (Parsons, 2004, p.72). However, WB Miller (1962) argues that general working class culture encourages law-breaking behaviour as opposed to subcultural gangs, with delinquents simply conforming to the ?focal concerns? of their culture. However, according to Marxism, laws are not the will of the people. It sees crime not as the result of subcultural influences but a consequence of capitalism. Pearce (1976) argued that the laws are created purely in the interests of the ruling class. It is argued that the system is ?rigged? against the working class and suggested that ruling class lawbreakers are less likely to be punished ? for example, working class crimes such as burglary are treated as the ?real criminals? by the media whilst corporate law-breakers get very little media condemnation and are treated more leniently by the justice system (Parsons, 2004, p.76). Crimes such as robbery and property theft is seen by Marxists such as Bonger (1916) ...read more.

Conclusion

In contrast to the idea of looking at society as a whole or strengthening the policing, Postmodernists argue that it is in fact down to the increasing individualisation of people and a breakdown of attachment to society. In modern society, people?s sense of identity has more to do with what they see in the media and the brands they buy into, whilst having less to do with their family or religion. This consumer culture encourages people to be individual and break away from the morals and values of their community. According to the Social Bonds Theory, those who are less attached to society are indeed more likely to commit crime. In conclusion, despite crime and deviance not being the norm within most people in society, there is plenty of evidence to say it still occurs for many different reasons. Where left realists, Functionalists and Postmodernists agree that consumer culture and personal lack of success may be to blame for a certain extent, it is other ideas such as those of Marxism and right realists who suggest the very things that are supposed to prevent crime, such as policing, authorities and laws, are in fact responsible for it. Reference List 1. Social Bonds Theory - Available online at: http://criminology.wikia.com/wiki/Social_Bond_Theory [Accessed 31st February 2013] 1. Parsons, R (2004) AS Level Sociology: AQA Revisions Guide, UK: CGP Publishings Ltd. 1. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Crime & Deviance section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Crime & Deviance essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Evaluate the Functionalist explanations of Deviance.

    4 star(s)

    Valier argues that there are, in fact, a variety of goals that people strive to attain at any one time. Whilst Merton's theory does provide some explanation, there are also a number of problems: 1. It assumes that people share similar ends.

  2. Sociological Theories on Crime and Deviance

    Radical feminists such as Heidensohn (1986) suggest this is because of the domination of sociology by men. The result is that crime issues relating to males, social class and ethnicity have been at the centre of most sociological theories of deviance.

  1. Crime: Social construction or reality?

    The labelling theory does not only account for having affects on certain individuals, but can have a negative effect on the way certain groups are viewed. The Jamie Bulger case which involved the killing of a two year old child by two ten year old children is a prime example.

  2. Free essay

    Assess the view that crime and deviance is the result of labelling, the media ...

    These are however, generally controlled, but we all hold them, and we all do them. Matza suggests that delinquents are simply more likely than most of us to behave according to subterranean values in inappropriate situations. Matza believed that the delinquents deviated from the norms of society by using techniques

  1. Assess The Contribution Of Control Theory To Our Understanding Of Crime And Criminality

    The third area is control derived through affectional identification with one's parents (primarily). Since essentially all parents disapprove of delinquent behaviours, children run the risk of upsetting them by being deviant. Yet children vary in the extent to which they are attached to their parents and respect them.

  2. describe four studies relating to crime and deviance - each from a different perspective. ...

    (Haralambos, 2000, page 381) Marxists maintain that crime and deviance occurs frequently in upper, middle and lower class stratum. Marxists deem Law enforcement within the capitalist society as prejudice towards lower class groups, the younger generation and ethnic minorities, thus people within these categories are more likely to be arrested, convicted and sent to prison.

  1. Compare and Contrast the Main Sociological Theories of Deviance.

    cultural goals, cultural norms and the institutionalised opportunities available within the social structure. Not everyone can become rich and successful, the American/British dream is not achievable by all, the opportunities for success are limited, and from this strain, disjunction occurs.

  2. Examine the ways in which social policy and laws may have influenced families and ...

    Equal Pay Act' of 1970, specifying that women should be paid the same as men for doing the same job, largely as a consequence of this act from 1970 to 1977 female earnings rose from 63% to 74% of men's, this indicates that this increase on earning has encouraged a

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work