• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Analyse explanations of crime and deviance and explain the importance of social order and social control

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

´╗┐Unit Title: Crime and Deviance Kayleigh Giles-Johnson Analyse explanations of crime and deviance and explain the importance of social order and social control In this essay we will be looking at the topic of crime and deviance, firstly defining what the two terms mean and looking at the difference between them, before analysing the importance of social order and social control. We will then look at why crime and deviance can occur even in a socially ordered society, analysing theories from different sociological perspectives in order to explain this. By definition, crime is behaviour that breaks the laws of a society, whilst deviance is behaviour that differs from the norms and values of a particular group or society (Swale J, 2007, p.131). Whilst crime is commonly deviant behaviour, deviant behaviour itself does not always include criminal activity. For example, robbing a bank is both criminal and deviant; however wearing a pair of knickers on your head is deviant but not necessarily a crime. Generally, most people do not take part in deviant or criminal behaviour for fear of being seen as abnormal or indecent by their society. Travis Hirschi?s Social Bonds Theory (1969), explains how the formation of attachment to family, friends and society in general can prevent deviant behaviour. ...read more.

Middle

However, this does not explain non-utilitarian crime such as vandalism. In contrast, subcultural theories say that crime and deviance is actually conformity for some groups in society; Albert Cohen (1955) said that working class boys, frustrated by lack of opportunities, joined or created groups with alternative cultural values, which tend to be the opposite of mainstream society, so deviant behaviour then becomes the norm (Parsons, 2004, p.72). However, WB Miller (1962) argues that general working class culture encourages law-breaking behaviour as opposed to subcultural gangs, with delinquents simply conforming to the ?focal concerns? of their culture. However, according to Marxism, laws are not the will of the people. It sees crime not as the result of subcultural influences but a consequence of capitalism. Pearce (1976) argued that the laws are created purely in the interests of the ruling class. It is argued that the system is ?rigged? against the working class and suggested that ruling class lawbreakers are less likely to be punished ? for example, working class crimes such as burglary are treated as the ?real criminals? by the media whilst corporate law-breakers get very little media condemnation and are treated more leniently by the justice system (Parsons, 2004, p.76). Crimes such as robbery and property theft is seen by Marxists such as Bonger (1916) ...read more.

Conclusion

In contrast to the idea of looking at society as a whole or strengthening the policing, Postmodernists argue that it is in fact down to the increasing individualisation of people and a breakdown of attachment to society. In modern society, people?s sense of identity has more to do with what they see in the media and the brands they buy into, whilst having less to do with their family or religion. This consumer culture encourages people to be individual and break away from the morals and values of their community. According to the Social Bonds Theory, those who are less attached to society are indeed more likely to commit crime. In conclusion, despite crime and deviance not being the norm within most people in society, there is plenty of evidence to say it still occurs for many different reasons. Where left realists, Functionalists and Postmodernists agree that consumer culture and personal lack of success may be to blame for a certain extent, it is other ideas such as those of Marxism and right realists who suggest the very things that are supposed to prevent crime, such as policing, authorities and laws, are in fact responsible for it. Reference List 1. Social Bonds Theory - Available online at: http://criminology.wikia.com/wiki/Social_Bond_Theory [Accessed 31st February 2013] 1. Parsons, R (2004) AS Level Sociology: AQA Revisions Guide, UK: CGP Publishings Ltd. 1. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Crime & Deviance section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Crime & Deviance essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Evaluate the Functionalist explanations of Deviance.

    4 star(s)

    3. It relies to some extent on official statistics. Crimes statistics don't tell us very much about "hidden" forms of crime (crimes that are committed but for which no-one is arrested)

  2. Sociological Theories on Crime and Deviance

    Liberal & Radical Feminism These early feminist explanations largely accept the statistics and believe that females are less criminally inclined than males. They stress that women are more likely to be victims of domestic violence and sexual assaults than men.

  1. Assess The Contribution Of Control Theory To Our Understanding Of Crime And Criminality

    This is the rational component in conformity. In other words, partaking in social activities ties an individual to the moral and ethical code of society. Hirsch's control theory holds that people who build an investment in life, property, and reputation are less likely to engage in criminal acts, which will jeopardize their social position.

  2. Crime: Social construction or reality?

    Becker, argues that criminals are forced into criminal roles through stereotypes, however, criminals could be falsely accused and transform into being a criminal, (Becker, 1963:145). The labelling theory does prove that society's reactions can force people into crime, however, not all criminals get the chance to be labelled criminal, or may not see themselves as criminal.

  1. Evaluate subcultural explanations for crime and deviance

    These sociologists also argued that there were conflict subcultures, which emerged when access to criminal networks could not happen. This type of deviant subculture centred on defensive and violent values, such as fighting with other alike 'gang' subcultures.

  2. describe four studies relating to crime and deviance - each from a different perspective. ...

    Hall argued that this 'moral panic' had not materialised from concern for the British public - but rather from a manipulative self-preservation tactic of the capitalist system. (Moore, 1996, 75) Hall suggests that street crime had been a long existing problem extending back to the 19th century - a problem

  1. Compare and Contrast the Main Sociological Theories of Deviance.

    This is sharply at odds with Durkheim's view that particular societies exert special pressure for higher rates of deviation. Durkheim also ignores conflicts about morality within a society, which is the stock in trade of the labelling theorist. Equally important, Durkheim, while accepting the relative nature of crime, also seems

  2. Outline and Assess Sociological Approaches to Social Control Within Crime and Deviance

    This is prevalent when you study young males. Approximately one-third of all males under the age of thirty have been arrested for a criminal offence, both major and minor classified crimes. Cohen says this number can only ever rise, as the range of control agencies is increasing, therefore the numbers of people they can 'process' is also on the rise.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work