• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Analyse explanations of crime and deviance and explain the importance of social order and social control

Extracts from this document...


´╗┐Unit Title: Crime and Deviance Kayleigh Giles-Johnson Analyse explanations of crime and deviance and explain the importance of social order and social control In this essay we will be looking at the topic of crime and deviance, firstly defining what the two terms mean and looking at the difference between them, before analysing the importance of social order and social control. We will then look at why crime and deviance can occur even in a socially ordered society, analysing theories from different sociological perspectives in order to explain this. By definition, crime is behaviour that breaks the laws of a society, whilst deviance is behaviour that differs from the norms and values of a particular group or society (Swale J, 2007, p.131). Whilst crime is commonly deviant behaviour, deviant behaviour itself does not always include criminal activity. For example, robbing a bank is both criminal and deviant; however wearing a pair of knickers on your head is deviant but not necessarily a crime. Generally, most people do not take part in deviant or criminal behaviour for fear of being seen as abnormal or indecent by their society. Travis Hirschi?s Social Bonds Theory (1969), explains how the formation of attachment to family, friends and society in general can prevent deviant behaviour. ...read more.


However, this does not explain non-utilitarian crime such as vandalism. In contrast, subcultural theories say that crime and deviance is actually conformity for some groups in society; Albert Cohen (1955) said that working class boys, frustrated by lack of opportunities, joined or created groups with alternative cultural values, which tend to be the opposite of mainstream society, so deviant behaviour then becomes the norm (Parsons, 2004, p.72). However, WB Miller (1962) argues that general working class culture encourages law-breaking behaviour as opposed to subcultural gangs, with delinquents simply conforming to the ?focal concerns? of their culture. However, according to Marxism, laws are not the will of the people. It sees crime not as the result of subcultural influences but a consequence of capitalism. Pearce (1976) argued that the laws are created purely in the interests of the ruling class. It is argued that the system is ?rigged? against the working class and suggested that ruling class lawbreakers are less likely to be punished ? for example, working class crimes such as burglary are treated as the ?real criminals? by the media whilst corporate law-breakers get very little media condemnation and are treated more leniently by the justice system (Parsons, 2004, p.76). Crimes such as robbery and property theft is seen by Marxists such as Bonger (1916) ...read more.


In contrast to the idea of looking at society as a whole or strengthening the policing, Postmodernists argue that it is in fact down to the increasing individualisation of people and a breakdown of attachment to society. In modern society, people?s sense of identity has more to do with what they see in the media and the brands they buy into, whilst having less to do with their family or religion. This consumer culture encourages people to be individual and break away from the morals and values of their community. According to the Social Bonds Theory, those who are less attached to society are indeed more likely to commit crime. In conclusion, despite crime and deviance not being the norm within most people in society, there is plenty of evidence to say it still occurs for many different reasons. Where left realists, Functionalists and Postmodernists agree that consumer culture and personal lack of success may be to blame for a certain extent, it is other ideas such as those of Marxism and right realists who suggest the very things that are supposed to prevent crime, such as policing, authorities and laws, are in fact responsible for it. Reference List 1. Social Bonds Theory - Available online at: http://criminology.wikia.com/wiki/Social_Bond_Theory [Accessed 31st February 2013] 1. Parsons, R (2004) AS Level Sociology: AQA Revisions Guide, UK: CGP Publishings Ltd. 1. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Crime & Deviance section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Crime & Deviance essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Evaluate the Functionalist explanations of Deviance.

    4 star(s)

    3. It relies to some extent on official statistics. Crimes statistics don't tell us very much about "hidden" forms of crime (crimes that are committed but for which no-one is arrested)

  2. Evaluate subcultural explanations for crime and deviance

    Miller argued that working class youths never accepted mainstream norms in the first place. Instead, Miller stated that working class youths are socialised into a set of lower class values or focal concerns. These values included things such as toughness, smartness, excitement and fatalism (they can't change their position in life).

  1. Sociological Theories on Crime and Deviance

    Radical feminists such as Heidensohn (1986) suggest this is because of the domination of sociology by men. The result is that crime issues relating to males, social class and ethnicity have been at the centre of most sociological theories of deviance.

  2. Crime: Social construction or reality?

    Becker, argues that criminals are forced into criminal roles through stereotypes, however, criminals could be falsely accused and transform into being a criminal, (Becker, 1963:145). The labelling theory does prove that society's reactions can force people into crime, however, not all criminals get the chance to be labelled criminal, or may not see themselves as criminal.

  1. describe four studies relating to crime and deviance - each from a different perspective. ...

    Symbolic interaction suggests that it is society itself that creates deviance - social action. Blummer (1969) indicated that human behaviour is not the result of social forces. He expressed that self-conscious nature of all individuals ultimately determines behaviour - individuals have a one-sided perception of any given situation and this determines their response and actions.

  2. Outline and Assess Subcultural Theories of Crime and Deviance

    Many of the approaches outlined above seek to explain deviant behaviour through rational reasoning as to why subcultures have developed. Some recent postmodern approaches reject this explanation for behaviour. Katz (1988), argues young men get drawn into crime, because it is seductive and thrilling, echoing Cohen.

  1. Compare and Contrast the Main Sociological Theories of Deviance.

    material wealth to which they have been taught to aspire, deviant behaviour may be the result. Merton argue that It is only when a system of cultural values extols, virtually above all else, certain common success goals for the population at large, while the social structure rigorously restricts or completely

  2. Critically Compare and Contrast Functionalist and Traditional Marxist Perspectives On Crime.

    Erikson showed how Durkheim had failed to explain differences in power and he showed how crime sets boundaries but added that it only seemed to be in the interests of the powerful therefore making a connection between the Functionalist and Marxist perspective.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work