• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Approaches to Crime and Punishment and Government Attitude's Impact on Punishment.

Extracts from this document...


Crime and Punishment Approaches to Crime and Punishment and Government Attitude's Impact on Punishment: At the end of the seventeenth century, the most common form of punishment was the death penalty through the Bloody code. This was due to the fact that the majority of lawmakers, rich landowners seeking to protect their assets, were still under the impression that punishments should be as harsh and as public as possible to deter people from wanting to commit crime. According to them, the removal of the worst offenders either by killing or transporting them was only a secondary purpose of punishment. Executions were always carried out in public and each year hundreds of people were hanged. The first reaction of the Government to any new crime which worried them was to add it to the list of crimes punishable by death, or capital crimes, which saw a rapid increase in the late seventeenth century. Punishments such as the stocks, the pillory and whipping were reserved for a wide variety of lesser offences such as vagrancy, drunkenness, debt and other local crimes which were not a threat to the Government or the King. ...read more.


A network of police forces was set up to prevent and police crime and the judicial system evolved into a proficient way of dealing with individual criminals and their crimes. Sentencing in courts now focused on reform through community service, education in prison and reduced sentences for good behaviour instead of trying to root out crime by eliminating serious offenders through transportation, execution and using it as a deterrent to others. Government attitudes towards crime and the causes of crime have had a direct effect on the changes to punishments. Although the word 'government' is quite a general term for whoever was running the country, it can be defined in three overall types spanning from the early 16th century to present day. During the 16th and 17th century, the country was run as an absolute monarchy, with the monarch ruling through the Devine Right of kings. As the King was supposed to have been God's representative on earth, any scepticism or criticism of their authority would be seen as heresy and even treason. ...read more.


The government was under the impression that the bloodier the punishment, the more it will deter possible offenders. Many new and even petty crimes were added to the bloody code, which carried the sentence of death by execution or torture. As the 20th century got under way, the government had developed into a constitutional monarchy, which gave the parliament the majority of power and effectively made Britain a democracy. The government now saw that it could play a more important and integrated role in the way people lived and could shape society's views. It realised that prison could serve as a way to rehabilitate as well as punish offenders and began to control people's view on racism and sexism, reducing the amount of crimes committed. Prison reform was a sign of this changing role. This more involved role in society eased the government's fear of revolution as it was now partly responsible for the way people lived and times were now stable with a more liberal attitude to religion and freedom of speech and the lack of civil war for about a century. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Crime & Deviance section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Crime & Deviance essays

  1. Free essay

    local trends in crime in Britain

    Counterbalancing was used in that equal numbers of male and female participants were asked to complete the questionnaire. Due to limited resources, time restrictions and lack of sociological expertise the following sampling methods were rejected. * Random sampling and systematic sampling - the latter involves choosing, for example, every third participant.

  2. Roman Crime and Punishment

    The first types of officials were the Aediles: Who were City Officials and patrolled the streets and prevented crimes. The second types of Officials were the Praetorian Guard: They were the Emperor's House Guards and were only used in real emergencies.

  1. Corporal Punishment.

    Although this is a good valid point isn't it possible that youths will realise that if they show respect, loyalty and consideration they won't get punished in any way, therefore there will be no chance for the influence of violence to effect them because they will be aware of what will happen if they do.

  2. Literature Review: The Impact of Heroin Prices on Robbery Trends

    - Dobson, I. and Ward, P. Drugs and Crime (1985) in Brown, D. et al, Criminal Laws: Material and Commentary on Criminal Law and the Process of Law in NSW. (2001), The Federation Press, Sydney. - Donnelly, N, Weatherburn, D.

  1. The changes in crime and punishment in schools

    This could be a form of sexism. This is relevant to me enquiry as it shows us how boys and girls are treated differently and punished differently. (See sheet 2). Therefore, to understand the changes in crime and punishment in schools we need to examine the punishments given and the

  2. Which is more effective - punishment by imprisonment or with in the community?

    alternative to imprisonment, which involves up to 240 hours of unpaid community work, a combination of these is a Community Punishment and Rehabilitation Order, and finally Drug Treatment and Testing Orders where the offender has a request in his order to receive treatment for a long standing drug dependence which necessitates criminal behaviours.

  1. Corporal Punishment.

    Yet, it should be a parent's job to discipline their child and different parents have different ways. Corporal Punishment may interfere with the teaching process of parent's to obedient their children. Furthermore, teachers should not be like parental figures to children as they work to teach not to discipline.

  2. The Evolution of Punishment.

    It was not possible for all the offences to be listed that were punished in this way. It was shown that the penal law still remained severe for the punishments held. 'A more advanced type of society'6, was more observed in the severity of punishment.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work