• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Assess functionalist theories of crime and deviance.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Sociology Chad Walker Assess functionalist theories of crime and deviance. Functionalism is a social structural and social control theory. It believes that it is society that causes the individual to commit crime. Social control theory looks at why people do not commit crime as it says that people are controlled by the primary and secondary agents of social control, such as the family or religion, and so should not commit crime. Functionalism is also a Right Wing theory, which believes that agents of social control like the police are fair and just; law reflects the collective conscience; people are biologically selfish and official statistics are valid. Functionalists included in this essay are Durkheim and Merton with evaluation from functionalist subcultural theorists, Cloward and Ohlin, and Marxism. Durkheim said that crime is inevitable: this is because people are not equally committed to the law due to individual differences and each society has its own definitions of what is deviant and so even a 'society of saints' will have deviance. He also said that crime is functional for society when there is the 'right' amount. The collective conscience needs to be at a moderate energy so that there is not too much or too little crime. ...read more.

Middle

Merton is a Functionalist as he believes that there is consensus within society over what the success goals are and he is a social structuralist as perceives societies culture to be the cause for why people commit crime. He also believes, based on official statistics, that the working class commit the majority of crime. He said that there are five responses to the strain: conformist, innovation, ritualist, retreatist and rebellion. Conformists represent the majority of the population who share societies success goals and institutional means. Innovation represents the working class who share societies success goals but lack the institutional means so they commit utilitarian crime. Ritualist represents the lower-middle class who have the institutional means but do not have the success goals. Retreatist represents alcoholics and drug abusers who have lost the institutional means and success goals and finally Rebellion represents activists such as Hippies who do not have societies success goals or the institutional means but forge their own. Merton's theory is criticised as it ignores white-collar crime and is seen as deterministic by social action theorists. Marxists disagree that society defines what the success goals are but that it is Capitalists who define it as money as people are socialised by the superstructure and it benefits them as they profit and causes people to work harder. ...read more.

Conclusion

Finally, if a person fails in both legitimate and illegitimate opportunity structures then they will join a retreatist subculture where they become alcoholics or drug abusers. To conclude, functionalist theories of crime and deviance can be criticised for ignoring white-collar crime, taking official statistics at face value and believing that the working class fail in education due to cultural deprivation when it may also be caused by material deprivation. Interactionist, Becker, found that teachers label pupils based on class so that teaching is then in favour of middle class pupils so they are more likely to succeed in legitimate opportunity structures. Bernstein also said that education teaches an ethnocentric curriculum that uses an elaborated code that middle class pupils have acquired at home while working class pupils are limited to a restricted code due to cultural and material deprivation so they are more likely to fail in legitimate opportunity structures. As Functionalism is also a Right-wing theory, it believes that the law reflects the collective conscience whereas Marxists disagree. Erickson's study of the wayward puritans found that ideology is imposed on people by people with power; thus, the law reflects the ideology of the ruling class. However, Durkheim believes that crime is inevitable but also functional and Merton states that crime is caused by societies culture that puts too much emphasis on success goals and not enough emphasis on institutional means of achieving them. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Crime & Deviance section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Crime & Deviance essays

  1. Sociological Theories on Crime and Deviance

    control over violent behaviour and who learn violence from aggressive peers are most likely to engage in violent crimes. STRENGTHS AND WEAKNESSES Functionalism emphasises that social structure, not just individual motivation, produces deviance. Functionalists argue that social conditions exert pressure on individuals to behave in conforming or nonconforming ways.

  2. Access the strengths and limitations of Subcultural Theories in explaining deviance.

    Despite the potential threats to social order, he saw some deviance and crime as necessary and beneficial, as it could perform functions in contributing to the well being of society in the following ways: By strengthening

  1. Evaluate Functionalist Theories of Crime and Deviance

    However, this view of crime and deviance would be criticized by interactionists as being too deterministic- and instead point at the role of human interaction in determining human behaviour including deviant or criminal behaviour. New Left Realists would claim that Parson's theories only investigate the results of poverty and deprivation

  2. Assess Interactionist theories of crime and deviance.

    a self fulfilling prophecy: Fuller's study of Black girls that were labelled as failures by teachers rejected their labels and so worked harder in order to succeed in education - however, their label still affected their behaviour. Reiss' study also showed how labels do not always lead to a self fulfilling prophecy.

  1. Critically compare the three main theories of deviance and assess their strengths & weaknesses

    * Chambliss (1976) argues that the greed, self-interest and hostility generated by capitalist society motivate crimes at all levels within society. Members of all classes use whatever opportunities they have to commit crime. * Given the nature of capitalist societies, crime is rational.

  2. Outline and evaluate the view that crime and deviance are socially constructed

    is these social norms which we infringe on ourselves that impact the laws which thus give us a clear definition of what is crime and what is deviance. Granted these norms are interchangeable and adapt continuously depending on various influences such as class, media and even religion.

  1. Evaluate functionalist theories of crime and deviance

    Another critique of Durkheim is Merton, who argues that people commit crime due to the strain they feel. Durkheim also fails to distinguish the different types of crime, he talks about them in very vague terms. Merton came up with The Strain Theory.

  2. Examine the role of access to opportunity structures in causing crime and deviance

    poor education qualifications and unemployment mean that legitimate means of achieving goals cannot be achieved. Ritualism is the third type of adaptation and is where individuals give up on trying to achieve the goals but accept the legitimate means and so follow the rules for their own sake.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work