• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Assess functionalist theories of crime and deviance.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Sociology Chad Walker Assess functionalist theories of crime and deviance. Functionalism is a social structural and social control theory. It believes that it is society that causes the individual to commit crime. Social control theory looks at why people do not commit crime as it says that people are controlled by the primary and secondary agents of social control, such as the family or religion, and so should not commit crime. Functionalism is also a Right Wing theory, which believes that agents of social control like the police are fair and just; law reflects the collective conscience; people are biologically selfish and official statistics are valid. Functionalists included in this essay are Durkheim and Merton with evaluation from functionalist subcultural theorists, Cloward and Ohlin, and Marxism. Durkheim said that crime is inevitable: this is because people are not equally committed to the law due to individual differences and each society has its own definitions of what is deviant and so even a 'society of saints' will have deviance. He also said that crime is functional for society when there is the 'right' amount. The collective conscience needs to be at a moderate energy so that there is not too much or too little crime. ...read more.

Middle

Merton is a Functionalist as he believes that there is consensus within society over what the success goals are and he is a social structuralist as perceives societies culture to be the cause for why people commit crime. He also believes, based on official statistics, that the working class commit the majority of crime. He said that there are five responses to the strain: conformist, innovation, ritualist, retreatist and rebellion. Conformists represent the majority of the population who share societies success goals and institutional means. Innovation represents the working class who share societies success goals but lack the institutional means so they commit utilitarian crime. Ritualist represents the lower-middle class who have the institutional means but do not have the success goals. Retreatist represents alcoholics and drug abusers who have lost the institutional means and success goals and finally Rebellion represents activists such as Hippies who do not have societies success goals or the institutional means but forge their own. Merton's theory is criticised as it ignores white-collar crime and is seen as deterministic by social action theorists. Marxists disagree that society defines what the success goals are but that it is Capitalists who define it as money as people are socialised by the superstructure and it benefits them as they profit and causes people to work harder. ...read more.

Conclusion

Finally, if a person fails in both legitimate and illegitimate opportunity structures then they will join a retreatist subculture where they become alcoholics or drug abusers. To conclude, functionalist theories of crime and deviance can be criticised for ignoring white-collar crime, taking official statistics at face value and believing that the working class fail in education due to cultural deprivation when it may also be caused by material deprivation. Interactionist, Becker, found that teachers label pupils based on class so that teaching is then in favour of middle class pupils so they are more likely to succeed in legitimate opportunity structures. Bernstein also said that education teaches an ethnocentric curriculum that uses an elaborated code that middle class pupils have acquired at home while working class pupils are limited to a restricted code due to cultural and material deprivation so they are more likely to fail in legitimate opportunity structures. As Functionalism is also a Right-wing theory, it believes that the law reflects the collective conscience whereas Marxists disagree. Erickson's study of the wayward puritans found that ideology is imposed on people by people with power; thus, the law reflects the ideology of the ruling class. However, Durkheim believes that crime is inevitable but also functional and Merton states that crime is caused by societies culture that puts too much emphasis on success goals and not enough emphasis on institutional means of achieving them. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Crime & Deviance section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Crime & Deviance essays

  1. Sociological Theories on Crime and Deviance

    control over violent behaviour and who learn violence from aggressive peers are most likely to engage in violent crimes. STRENGTHS AND WEAKNESSES Functionalism emphasises that social structure, not just individual motivation, produces deviance. Functionalists argue that social conditions exert pressure on individuals to behave in conforming or nonconforming ways.

  2. Evaluate Functionalist Theories of Crime and Deviance

    to explain crime, and would point at the role of increasing inequality and dissatisfaction as a cause of crime and deviance. On the other hand, socio-biologists such as Anderson would argue that crime and deviance are a result of an excess of male chromosomes, not the results of "bad" socialization of any kind.

  1. Access the strengths and limitations of Subcultural Theories in explaining deviance.

    Cohen identifies elements of revenge in this subculture as a way to get back at society for denying them the mainstream goals, and this revenge element explains why a lot of juvenile crime is not motivated by financial gain. Offences such as joy-riding, vandalism and fighting are more motivated by

  2. subcultural theory

    Miller has been criticized for providing little evidence to show that these are particularly lower class values. Box (1981), points out that they could equally apply to males right across the class structure. However, The following quotation from Moore and Hendrey (1982)

  1. Assess the view that crime is functional, inevitable and normal.

    This was evident after the attacks of September 11th 2001 in the USA. These events strengthen the community's sense of belonging. Durkheim argues that some crime is inevitable, but only in some societies, the crime rate may become too much (pathological)

  2. Outline and Assess Sociological Approaches to Social Control Within Crime and Deviance

    He notes how the state has now started to hand over some of its monopoly of controlling people to these private firms, which has lead to a growth in private prisons. There are currently 11 private prisons operating in United Kingdom, the first opened in the early 1990's.

  1. Why is crime so hard to define?

    The law, in England at least is not decided by everyone for the good of our society. It is decided by a handful of people residing in our capital that we have given the power to to make decisions for us.

  2. Evaluate functionalist theories of crime and deviance

    Merton came up with The Strain Theory. He argued that many people within society, feel under strain and pressure to achieve ?The American Dream? of wealth, success and also competition.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work