• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Assess Interactionist theories of crime and deviance.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Sociology Chad Walker Assess Interactionist theories of crime and deviance. In this essay I am going to assess Interactionists theories of crime and deviance such as Becker's labelling theory, theories of how agents of social control amplify deviance and assess how Interactionists influence social policy with evaluation. Interactionists study the effects that labelling has on people. They are critical of Right Wing theories such as the New Right, Right Realism and Functionalism as Right Wing theories claim that agents of social control, like the police, are unbiased, fair and just although Cicourel's study shows how police hold typifications which can lead to a self fulfilling prophecy. Interactionists have similar views to Marxists, believing that Right Wing theories are biased against the working class and believe that official statistics are invalid and reveal more information about the people compiling the data rather than the statistics themselves. Interactionism is a social action theory which opposes social structural theories held by Right Wing theories as it believes that people have free will - instead of passively reacting to society, people stop to interpret a situation before choosing how to act. ...read more.

Middle

Folk devils create a moral panic as society over reacts to a perceived problem and society's reaction amplifies the problem. Cohen uses the example of Margate in 1960 where a fight between two groups of teenagers took place. The disorder was minor yet the media exaggerated and distorted the event that made them both look like distinct subcultures which affected society's reaction to teenagers. The people of Margate then labelled them and caused these two subcultures to emerge, creating a self fulfilling prophecy. However, McRobbie and Thornton have criticised Cohen by saying that due to the large amount of coverage of social events in the media, moral panics have become routine and so have less of an effect. Interactionists have been criticised for their theories of moral panic as they do not explain why the media amplifies some problems and not others. Interactionism (being a social action theory) criticises social structural theories for being deterministic as it says people are passive when the social action theory can be criticised for being deterministic too as labels do not inadvertently lead to a self fulfilling prophecy. The moral panic theory implies that people are passive although it says they are not. ...read more.

Conclusion

Left and Right Realist theories criticise Interactionism for romanticising crime by excusing working class crimes and ignoring the seriousness of working class crime. The Marxist, Goulder also criticises Interactionism for it ignores the concept of power and says that Capitalists have the power to impose labels. Goulder criticises Becker's research of moral entrepreneurs as he says that people are either successful or unsuccessful in changing the law based on the amount of power they have. For example, factories continue to pollute the environment as they have economic leverage over the government. To conclude, Interactionist theories of crime and deviance can be criticised as they do not explain why some problems presented in the media are amplified and why some are not. The labelling theory is deterministic as it assumes that labels will lead to self fulfilling prophecies when studies have shown that this is not always the case. It ignores white collar crime, romanticises working class crime by excusing it and ignores the concept of power and those who have the power to impose labels. However, developments have acknowledged that the behaviour may come before the label but since the 1990s Right Realist theories have surpassed Interactionism in their influence over government policy. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Crime & Deviance section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Crime & Deviance essays

  1. Assess Marxist theories of crime and deviance.

    Even though Marxists believe that capitalists are the real criminals, they go on to explain why the working class commit crime. They believe that crime is inevitable in capitalist society as capitalism itself is criminogenic. D. Gordon describes capitalist society as a 'dog eat dog world' as people are socialised

  2. Sociological Theories on Crime and Deviance

    The result is structural strain that produces deviance. Poor people are most likely to experience these strains because they internalise the same goals and values of the rest of society but have blocked opportunities for success. Thus, structural strain theory helps explain the moderately high correlation that exists between unemployment and crime.

  1. describe four studies relating to crime and deviance - each from a different perspective. ...

    is therefore offered in the form of excelling in criminal acts and deviant behaviour. Acts such as theft are not carried out specifically to achieve monetary rewards - theft can provide an opportunity to excel in the delinquent subcultures adaptation of mainstream goals in which value is placed upon a rebellious attitude with regards to conforming on any level.

  2. Outline and Assess Subcultural Theories of Crime and Deviance

    discovered it was more for the thrill of the act, rather than for the money involved. Many modern day sociologists believe this is as true today as it was in the 1950's, for example, joyriding has increased, yet the cars are burnt, not sold on, so there is not an

  1. Critically assess the contribution of labelling theory to an understanding of crime and deviance

    as these are what the police as the 'bad' areas with high crime rates. They then have to decide whether to stop and interrogate an individual, they will stop someone if, in the polices opinion, they are 'suspicious', 'strange' and 'wrong'.

  2. Compare and Contrast the Main Sociological Theories of Deviance.

    They mainly base their ideas and theories on how the powerful people control the society which influences how the society works today. Marxists seems to believe that young working class males commit most crime mainly due to the media which reinforces ideas of materialism into people.

  1. The Strengths and Limitations of Left Realism and Right Realism Theories in Explaining Crime ...

    They propose that the public should have more say in shaping police policy, and officers should spend more time investigating crime rather than simply being 'on the beat', which antagonises the public. Young argues that certain areas of crime (e.g.

  2. Explain & Evaluate Functionalist, Marxist & Interactionist Theories of Crime & Deviance

    murder may bring about boundary maintenance and unite a community, whilst having a negative impact on relatives of the one murdered. Merton (1938) further expands on Durkheim?s ideas of anomie to explain deviance and suggests that deviance is the result of a strain between: the goals that a culture encourages

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work