• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Assess sociological explanations of the different crime rates of men and women.

Free essay example:

Assess sociological explanations of the different crime rates of men and women.

Whilst men are not convicted more often than women for all types of crime (e.g. women are more likely to shop lift), in general, an analysis of crime statistics shows that men are convicted of crime far more often than women, and this trend is apparent across all ages, ethnicities, social classes and regions of the UK. For instance, women only make up 6% of the prison population, and in 2001, 167 per 10,000 of the male population were found guilty or cautioned for an offence compared to 3.7 per 10,000 of the female population. Indeed, these statistics do not always give an accurate picture of which gender is more likely to commit crimes, but self-report studies, too, show a noticeable difference between offending levels of males and females.

Sociologists and criminologists have tried to explain just why this significant difference in crime rates between men and women exists. One theory is that of “sex-role” theory. This theory argues that women are less likely to commit crime than men because there are core elements of the female role that limit their ability and opportunity to do so. Talcott Parsons argues how the values that girls are brought up on are values which do not lead to crime. He points to the fact that as most child-rearing is carried out by mothers, girls have a clear role model to follow that emphasizes caring and support. This idea of “socialization” forms a key part to functionalist theory in general, where institutions like schools and religion are said to play a vital role in achieving social harmony.

The work of Farrington and Painter supports Parson’s views on the role of socialization. They conducted a longitudinal study of female offenders which led them to find that female offenders were much more likely to have had harsh or erratic parenting, and to have had little support or praise from their parents for their achievements at school and in their community. Therefore we can see that the role of socialization (a part of sex-role theory) provides at least some explanation as to why there are different crime rates between men and women.

Abbot and Wallace, however, claim that young women are more closely watched by their families and are given less freedom outside the home - reducing their opportunities for crime. This idea of “social control” which, like socialization, is linked in with sex-role theory provides an example of how by focusing on small-scale human interactions (interactionism) behaviour in society can be explained. Hagan’s study of child-raising patterns in Canada provides another example of the study of small-scale human interactions, whilst also providing evidence to support Abbot and Wallace’s theory. Hagan found that there was significantly greater informal control of daughters’ activities in families compared to sons’, therefore, it could quite legitimately be said that social control (particularly at a younger age) is an important factor influencing the different crime rates between men and women.

Having said that, Ian Marsh (1986) claims that men commit more crime because they have more opportunities to do so. Men are typically more independent throughout their lives when compared to women, who, in contrast, are marginalized in a narrower range of roles. Feminists would claim women are marginalized in more restricted roles (such as motherly, caring roles) because we live in a patriarchal society which limits females’ opportunities. Evidence which Marsh uses to support his view is that women more frequently handle stolen goods because they have more opportunities to sell and use stolen goods, therefore, if women were to have the same amount of opportunities as men to commit crimes, then they would commit the same, or a similar amount, of crimes.

In contrast to all of the sociological explanations for the different rates of crime between the two genders, there are in fact biological explanations as to why there is a gender difference in crime, all of which challenge the sociological, sex-role theories. These biological explanations start from the belief that women are innately different from men. ‘Normal’ women have a natural desire to be caring, and therefore, women do not commit as much crime as men. These biological explanations therefore provide a challenge to some of the other theories discussed in this essay, which, instead, assume ones’ desire to commit crime are shaped and determined by social influences.

Indeed, when examining the difference between mens’ and womens’ crime rates, it can be all too easy to focus purely on why women appear to commit much less crime than men. However, Katz, a postmodernist, has looked at the “seductions of crime”. He claims that when young men are unsure of exactly who they are and what their place in society is they can turn to crime (particularly dangerous, risky crime like robbery) as it can provide a thrill which is a welcome break from boredom. Lyng builds on the ideas of Katz by arguing that young males search for pleasure through risk-taking (“edgework”). He argues that there is a thrill to be gained from acting in dangerous, insecure ways which inadvertently allows these young men to “accomplish masculinity”.

Both Lyng and Katz’s work has, however, been criticized for not slotting the notions of masculinities into a context. In other words, they do not, for example, explain why young working-class males are more likely to be violent than older middle-class males. Winlow claims the answer to this question is that a significant amount of the male working class population has been excluded from the low level, white collar jobs which have resulted from changes in the structure of the economy. According to Wilson, this has resulted in the development of an urban underclass who manifest a range of violent and antisocial behaviours.

It is clear therefore that there are a number of different sociological explanations for the different crime rates between men and women. These explanations focus upon the social influences which cause women to commit crime, and the social influences which cause men to commit crime, whilst each view takes a different theoretical approach in trying to explain the differences.

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Crime & Deviance section.

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Related AS and A Level Sociology Skills and Knowledge Essays

See our best essays

Related AS and A Level Crime & Deviance essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Asses the arguments and evidence which suggest women commit much less crime than men

    4 star(s)

    Smart also said that the criminal justice system is biased towards women, especially in sex related offences, supporting this view with quotes by judges in rape cases, "Women who do not always say no do not always mean no. It is not a question of how she says it, how she shows it and makes it clear.

  2. Sociological Theories on Crime and Deviance

    as material wealth while denying people the opportunity to achieve them by legitimate means such as decent jobs. A further trend in late modernity is for relative deprivation to become generalised throughout society rather than being confined by those at the bottom.

  1. Assess sociological explanations of social class differences in crime rates

    Diffusion of responsibility; a single individual is rarely blamed, punishment is often widespread * Diffusion of victimisation; many corporate crimes are described as victimless, as they do not appear to overtly negatively affect people like murder and robbery does Because of these

  2. Outline and asses the different ways of measuring crime

    Either way, as with victim surveys the results can not be verified and therefore the truthfulness of the statistics is brought into question and the measurements of crime could possibly be totally invalid.

  1. Compare and Contrast the Main Sociological Theories of Deviance.

    He argues that there are six focal concerns of working class culture, which can lead working class males into crime. He is suggesting that crime is simply an extension of normal working class values, not a distinctive set of alternative values.

  2. How useful are Sociological Theories in explaining crime and the control of crime? Consider ...

    He states that as a result more lower class individuals become failures and hence develop feelings of shame, resentment and bitterness. It is at this point that those who experience similar rejection turn to like individuals and form their own 'status system' with values in opposition to those of the middle classes.

  1. Discuss, critically evaluating the ways in which positivist ideas have found expression in explanations ...

    One student in particular, named Enrico Ferri, was not content to focus merely on the physical appearance and biological background of the criminal. He wanted to widen the study and analyse the effects of social circumstances and upbringing on a possible offender.

  2. Using Item A and elsewhere, assess different sociological explanations of suicide

    Later positivist approaches from Gibbs and Martin, have criticised Durkheim?s typology, because integration is hard to define and therefore hard to conceptualise and measure, and therefore sought to define it as a situation where there are stable and long lasting relationships, which happens when there is status integration, for example

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work