• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Assess the claim that the main function of education is to maintain a value consensus in society

Extracts from this document...


Assess the claim that 'the main function of education is to maintain a value consensus in society' (20) Different theorists believe in different functions of the education system, some think it as promoting value consensus and some see otherwise. Functionalists believe that education transmits society's norms and values and therefore promotes value consensus, with the educational and economic system working hand in hand to develop the skills required for the world of work. Emile Durkheim provides the basic framework of the functionalists view on the education system, agreeing with its function of transmitting norms and values. He believed that for society to operate effectively they have to develop a sense of belonging to something, becoming 'social beings' with a loyalty and commitment to society as a whole. The education system creates this effectively by teaching subjects such as history, which enables children to see the link between themselves and wider society. He argued that you must learn to cooperate with everyone, whether they are friends, family or just acquaintances, which can only be learnt at school and not at home. Durkheim also believed punishments should reflect the damage done and made clear that the transgressor will be punished by strictly enforcing school rules to help pupils learn what is wrong in society as a whole. He finally argued that education teaches individuals specific skills necessary for future occupations, with industrial society being united by value consensus and a specialised division of labour whereby specialists combine and produce goods and services. ...read more.


* Pupils are motivated by external rewards such as good grades. They claim learning is based upon the 'jug and mug' principle, meaning the teachers possess the knowledge which they pour into the 'empty jugs'. * Fragmentation of school subjects, by having the student move around from one subject to another, with little connection between them, this corresponds to the fragmentation of the workforce as most of the time jobs are broken down into specific tasks performed by individuals so workers are denied knowledge of the overall process, making it impossible to compete with their employers. Bowles and Gintis therefore believe that the hidden curriculum produces a passive and obedient workforce that accepts authority without question, which is motivated by rewards and which is fragmented. They claim that capitalism needs a surplus of skilled labour which maintains the high rate of unemployment and ensures that workers of all levels of skill have to compete with each other for jobs. Employers can pay low wages by threatening dismissal and replacement by a reserve army of skilled labour. The illusion that everybody has an equal chance is created by the education to help legitimate social inequality, claiming that those who achieve high qualifications deserve their success; this is a myth of meritocracy. Criticisms of Bowles and Gintis include; * Brown et al (1997) argue that changes in the workplace have actually increased the importance of team working rather than isolating individuals. * They are criticised for their claims about the way schools shape personality. ...read more.


3. Teacher's expectations and attitudes - Although much has changed in recent years, Heaton and Lawson (1996) argue that many teachers still have strong sexist attitudes towards tasks in the classroom e.g. boys are still asked to move furniture around. 4. Through a patriarchal curriculum - Many feminists argue what is taught in school still creates gender inequality in education. The way sport is taught tends to focus more on the achievement of boys than girls e.g. football. The choices made by boys and girls in A Levels are still strongly gender specific in some areas. 5. Through a lack of positive role models - Despite the fact that there are more female teachers in England and Wales, more men occupy the senior management levels, with few black female teachers. Feminists argue that this creates an expectation that positions of power and authority are automatically associated with men. Education is seen as a major source of gender socialisation by feminists. Different feminists highlight different aspects of the education system that enforce an ideology that males are naturally in positions of power and authority. The hidden curriculum shows a variety of ways that these processes work. However, do remember that despite the many problems that females face in school, they are generally outperforming males in all areas of education, so stop complaining. In conclusion, the functionalists believe that the main function of education is to maintain a value consensus in society, however the Marxist view is that the main role is to serve the needs of capitalism, creating a socialising a new workforce, and the feminists believe that the role is to maintain a state of patriarchy. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Sociological Differentiation & Stratification section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Sociological Differentiation & Stratification essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Outline and assess Functionalist explanations of the role of the education system.

    4 star(s)

    As a result, Bowles and Ginitis agree that role allocation is a function of the education system, but rather that it is a dysfunction of the system, rather than a positive which meets the economic needs of society. Bowles and Gintis argue that the education system does not contribute to

  2. The education system is meritocratic

    The social democratic political time brought into play the comprehensive system as a way to try and make a meritocracy but they do not believe that it exists. The social democratic view is that of Gordon Brown and the Labour Party they believe in helping people to do well and

  1. Outline and Assess Whether stratification is either inevitable or beneficial to individuals and society?

    Weber like Marx treated social class as an economic matter. He agreed that ownership of productive property an non ownership is an important basis for class formation but Weber moved away from this 2 class model. He chose to define class in terms of position in the market place.

  2. essay question sociology - education

    Usually the lower class blames itself for not doing well (society being based on merit).However it is the Capitalist system's fault. So according to Marx and conflict theorists, education is not based on merit it is based on class.IQ or talent does not count, all the dominant position goes to

  1. Is the Underachievement of Ethnic Minority Children due to a Racist School System?

    changing and social mobility is becoming less of a problem, still the change is much too slow". This does correspond to an extent to Tizzard's research in 'Young children at school in the inner city' in that Afro-Caribbean families haven't got a tradition of seeking higher education, as there is majority of working class ethnic minority families.

  2. Modern Britain is now a secular society

    and cults is interpreted as evidence of secularization, because of the fragmentation of religious practice. Sects and cults appear and disappear with great regularity and this type of religious participation is interpreted as a general institutional weakening of the role of religion because people seem to have little overall commitment to these types of religious organizations.

  1. sociology of education

    Bowles and Gintis (1976) argue that the education system does not offer meritocracy, and a pupil's success is not always in line with their ability. They suggest pupils who conform are more likely to rise to the top. There are limitations to the work of Bowles, Gintis and Althusser.

  2. Assess the view that the main function of education is to reproduce and legitimise ...

    However, radical feminists oppose this idea and feel that patriarchy is still central within education and society in general, and this must be challenged. Notably, radical feminists ignore how female students can actively choose to reject patriarchal or oppressive attitudes within education.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work