• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Assess the contribution of functionalism to our understanding of families and households.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

´╗┐Assess the contribution of functionalism to our understanding of families and households. Functionalist sociologists believe that the family is the key institution of society and that it performs vital functions for the maintenance of society as a whole as well as for individual members. According to Murdock, it provides important sub-system that provides stable satisfaction for the sex drive and therefore avoids social disruption. As well as this, Murdock says the family reproduces the next generation and thus ensuring current society to continue. Parsons argued that the pre-industrial society was focused on the extended family. Roles in these families were always based on ascription, not achievement. According to parsons, industrialisation had many effects on the family. This meant that the economy demanded a more geographically mobile workforce. Nuclear families were formed as people moved away their extended kin in order to take advantage of job opportunities. Specialized Agencies took over many functions of the family e.g., families could now buy food and clothes mass-produced by factories. ...read more.

Middle

Therefore, the family sets boundaries for deviant behaviour and ensures that children grow up to conform to laws and rules. However, there are many criticisms towards functionalist views on the family. Marxists argue that the nuclear family reproduces and maintains class inequality and the working class are distracted from the fact that they are exploited by capitalism. E.g. having the father as the leader within the family discourages workers from questioning the hierarchy nature of capitalism. From a Marxist perspective, the nuclear family benefits those who run the capitalist system, not the whole of society. Marxist-Feminists argue that the Nuclear family supports capitalism and benefits men. Women are pressure to have children, which then become the workforce. In addition, the socialisation of children ensures the pattern of male dominance and female subordination. Marxist feminists also look at the family in a negative and critical way. They argue the main cause of women's oppression is capitalism- the economic system that exists in the most countries in the world. ...read more.

Conclusion

They support family diversity, especially single or gay/ same sex families and disagree with the nuclear family. They also support divorce as it allows women to escape a patriarchal lifestyle. The New Right holds traditional values and believes that the 'normal' nuclear family is the cornerstone of society. They believe in the nuclear family (similar to conservatives). They believe that families are not changing but 'deteriorating' because of the decline in the Nuclear Family. Murray believed that the Beveridge report encouraged the welfare state instead of helping people the way it was intended to because social attitudes lead people to believe they have a right to receive benefits. He is highly critical of the Welfare state and believes that this started a dependency culture, which has now led to an Underclass. In conclusion, functionalism does not contribute a lot to our understanding of families and households as there are many different views on the same concept by different sociological groups, therefore looking at just a functionalist argument would be bias and would only provide a narrow understanding of the whole concept of families and households. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Family & Marriage section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Here's what a teacher thought of this essay

3 star(s)

This is a fairly good essay that uses some very good counter-arguments in particular. The essay however does miss out some of the key aspects of the Functionalist view in terms of the main functions of the family. Also the introduction and particularly the conclusion need to be stronger. Mark: ***

Marked by teacher Matthew Wilkin 09/04/2013

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Family & Marriage essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Critically examine the Functionalist idea that the nuclear family exists for the benefit of ...

    5 star(s)

    families, they are seen as the best way to bring up children, and women are seen to have the main role in this childcare. Beechey and other feminists see this as an ideological view of the family. It is untested and it allows male dominance to continue.

  2. Marked by a teacher

    Examine the factors affecting the domestic division of labour and power relations between couples.

    4 star(s)

    In conclusion I found that men were gradually doing more domestic work according to the data found and researched. Stephen Edgell looked in decision making as a change affecting domestic division of labour and power. Edgell interviewed couples about who made the decisions they thought were most important.

  1. Decline of nuclear family

    and careers and are perhaps wanting more from their relationships with men than in the past. Hart has argued that the increase in the divorce rate clearly indicates a 'consumerist approach' to marriage. As with our role of consumers we are less and less likely to 'make do' with something once it ceases to please us.

  2. Examine the view that the nuclear family is universal. (24)

    After puberty, the Nayar girl began taking visiting husbands, often warriors who spent long period of time away from their villages acting as mercenaries. During their time in the village they were allowed to visit any number of Nayar women who had undergone the tail rite and were members of the same caste or lower.

  1. Examine the effects of industrialization on the structure of the family

    short life expectancy so most grandparents would not life long after they see their first grandchild. However Young and Willmott looked at the history of the family in Britain to describe the changes. They argued that the structure of the family has gone trough three stages.

  2. Assess the view that marriage is no longer a popular institution in todays postmodernist ...

    the financial security of marriage and are freer to opt for cohabitation instead, some even staying single in order to establish themselves in a career before committing to a relationship let alone starting a family. Secularisation is another reason for the increase in cohabitation.

  1. Analyse how the family structure has changed over the last 100 years

    Oppose to the decline in importance of who is the breadwinner, the availability of the welfare benefits to single parents gives the oppurtunity for women to file for divorce knowing that they are going to have some financial help. this encourages women to get out of unhappy or unsafe marriages

  2. Assess sociological explanations of the nature and extent of family diversity today

    The first fact is that as individual social factors, we make choices about our family life and relationships. Structural approaches wrongly assume that our actions are shaped and dictated by the 'needs of society'. The second fact is that we now have so much greater choice about our personal relationships,

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work