• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Assess the contribution of Marxist theories to an understanding of the relationship between deviance and power.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Assess the contribution of Marxist theories to an understanding of the relationship between deviance and power. 40marks. The Marxist approach to deviance is very varied, incorporating a wide number of sociologists who interpret Marx differently. The basic Marxist approach at its simplest is seen as the working class rebelling against the suppressive capitalist system. This is a positivist approach to understanding crime and deviance because deviant behaviour is explained as being produced by forces beyond individual's controls. Neo-Marxists agree with traditional Marxists, however they believe that the explanation for deviance does not lie solely in the infrastructure of society, they also try to be aware of reactions to those who break the law. This is a social action theorist's perspective; they accuse positivist's ideas as being too deterministic, regarding the individual as being too trapped by circumstances and having no free will to resist the circumstances. Under the umbrella term of Marxism also comes a subcultural approach and Left Realism that provide a less idealistic explanation for deviance. The basic Marxist approach to deviance focuses on the working class suppression by the capitalist system. It sees the Capitalists as using socialisation to maintain control in society, as well as creating laws that benefit and protect the capitalists. A good example of this comes from a study by Box, the study focused on the extent to which large corporations commit crime. ...read more.

Middle

Mugging is not even a crime under the law, rather a term used to define various different forms of violence or theft. This study demonstrates the Neo-Marxist approach to deviance as well as illustrating the internationalist approaches Neo-Marxists use. It has been criticised for contradicting itself and also by not showing that the rise of crime was because of a crisis in British Capitalism. Gilroy also supports the theory of labelling in relation to Marxism. He approaches black criminality, seeing it as a result of the social structure as a whole; blacks and Asians are blamed for society's problem, which are in reality the responsibility of the capitalists. Left Realists, Lea and Young, criticise Gilroy's approach, they do not see certain types of crime being specialized toward certain ethnic minority groups. Lea and Young also argue that Traditional Marxists and Neo-Marxists are too idealistic about the causes of crime. They believe Traditional and Neo Marxists place too much emphasis on white-collar crime and neglect street crime. Lea and Young draw on three theories as part of their over all idea about the causes of street crime. Firstly Lea and Young believe relative deprivation can cause crime, individuals feel deprived compared to other groups, especially with the media stressing the importance of economic success and exposure to middle class values. As a result the deprived individuals come together into subcultures in order to adapt and cope with new lifestyles, one subculture response can be crime. ...read more.

Conclusion

Merton saw deviance arising from the class structure, and the strain between 'goals', the values held by society, and the 'means', the norms of society; the way the 'goals' are achieved. The strain can lead to a state of anomie, or normlessness and a response to this is crime. The environment can also be a factor in causing deviance. Ecological theories of crime include ideas of 'social disorganization' where the mechanisms of society that prevent people from committing crime in certain areas are weak or absent. This is developed to mean the values laid down by society are rejected in certain areas, often the poorest areas of society. Other ecological explanations say it is the individuals exposure to those who break the law that cause them to turn to crime themselves, as well as placing problem families together that can amplify the problem. In conclusion, Marxists approach to deviance is a very wide perspective. These theories, especially Neo-Marxist, are useful because they combine positivist and internationalist, therefore both qualitative and quantative methods of investigating, and so potentially getting very thorough results. They do tend to look at society very negatively, unlike functionalists for example. Marxist contribute a wide range and large number of theories towards the explanation for deviance, extending the explanation for crime even further and allowing further understanding into why crime exists and what can be done to prevent it. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Crime & Deviance section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Crime & Deviance essays

  1. Sociological Theories on Crime and Deviance

    whole too easily ignores the inequities in society and how these inequities are reflected in patterns of deviance. These issues are left for sociologists who work from the perspectives of conflict theory and symbolic interaction. Marxism Conflict theory emphasises the unequal distribution of power and resources in society.

  2. Critically evaluate the contribution that the Labelling theory has made to our understanding of ...

    Secondly, the very concept of mental illness is socially constructed. What is considered to be bizarre or unexplainable behaviour varies according to circumstance. It is not that certain forms of behaviour are essentially 'mad', rather that our definition of what is normal, and what is not, varies over time between different people.

  1. Assess The Contribution Of Control Theory To Our Understanding Of Crime And Criminality

    Crimes committed against the establishment and /or the church were dealt with by brutal and bloody punishments. The origins of the concept of crime are found in the classical tradition. A conception of crime presupposes a conception of human nature.

  2. Critically compare the three main theories of deviance and assess their strengths & weaknesses

    Taylor, Walton and Young (1973) argue that labelling theory is wrong in suggesting that deviance is created by the social groups who define acts as deviant. Some acts - such as premeditated killing for personal gain - will always be regarded as deviant in our society.

  1. describe four studies relating to crime and deviance - each from a different perspective. ...

    This can be considered as reaction formation as delinquents do not have access to this lifestyle and consequently rebel against it. However he also implies that this is not the only reason for defiant behaviour. As the values of the subculture are in opposition to the consensus values - status

  2. Assess Marxist theories of crime and deviance.

    However, drug companies put pressure on the government not to enforce this law so capitalists owned factories could continue to manufacture amphetamine and continue their profits. This shows that capitalists are exempt from the law. Another example is given by Carson who took a sample from 200 firms, all of which had broken health and safety laws at least once.

  1. Compare and Contrast the Main Sociological Theories of Deviance.

    Steven Box suggested another type which is known as Corporate Crime. This is when people commit crime from where they work for their own benefit such as stealing pens, petrol etc. This may not seem as a deviant behaviour to some people as they do not realise that it is still illegal and it is morally wrong just like murder.

  2. Compare and evaluate Subcultural theory and labelling theory

    that they are not deviant or a naughty child and that they just have in most cases been misunderstood at some point in life. Every child will be naughty at some stage of their life's and teachers and society need to recognise this and help the child to overcome this,

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work