• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Assess the extent to which religion produces social change. Many sociologists such as functionalists and Marxists would argue that religion doesnt affect social change and is a conservative force.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Using material from item A and elsewhere, assess the extent to which religion produces social change By Kate Lawson Many sociologists such as internationalists and neo-Marxists believe that religion is causing social change in society. However other sociologists such as functionalists and Marxists believe that it is a conservative force and religion can't contribute to changing society. However functionalists would explain this change as a positive thing where as Marxists would see it as harming society. Functionalists claim that religion acts as a conservative force by promoting integration and social solidarity. Durkheim says religion does this by a religion worshipping a totem which is sacred as it symbolises the group itself, who by worshipping a totem are in fact worshipping their society. Most religions involve collective worship with rituals which leads to social solidarity being heightened. Durkheim suggest that gods are just the expression of what he calls the collective conscience which are the shared beliefs, values, traditions and norms that make society work. This collective conscience has remained similar throughout religion as everyone does still hold the same norms and values. By maintaining social solidarity, religion acts as a conservative force so therefore not producing any social change. Functionalists are not saying that religion does not change, they are saying what remains the same is the function as that is to offer support to the status quo. ...read more.

Middle

So therefore religion helped to encourage the spirit of capitalism which is a set of ideas, ethics and values. Therefore Weber claims that religion does contribute to causing social change amongst society as it contributed a great deal in the industrial revolution. This is reflected in Item A as it shows the Protestants main work ethic to "produce riches" and "grow rich" which also is very similar to the capitalism ethic. Weber also says that social change can be caused by charismatic religious leaders as they have been responsible for a number of many alternative social arrangements, often causing conflict with mainstream society. However people argue against Webers theory as some countries with a large Calvinist population didn't industrialise such as Norway and Sweden. Some sociologists would say that slavery, colonialism and piracy were more important in developing industrialisation and producing the capitalist work ethic. Marxists such as Kautsky argued that capitalism predates Calvinism; he argued that the early capitalists were attracted to capitalism because it made their interests appear legitimate. Aldridge argues that charismatic leaders can be unstable and the movements that these leaders create are often changed when the leader dies. Like Durkheim, Marx also argues that religion is a conservative force, however he sees this force as negative. Marx argues that the primary function of religion is to reproduce, maintain and justify class inequalities, and that is used as ideological apparatus which serves to reflect the working class ideas and interests. ...read more.

Conclusion

Ghandia used the Hindu concept of sarvodaya to attack the British colonial rule. Another factor they is social location, they believe that where a religious organisation plays a major role in political or economic life, there is more chance of it causing social change. Their third factor is beliefs, religions are that emphasise strong moral codes are more likely to produce members who will be critical and challenge social inequality and injustice, for e.g. Christianity was a huge opponent of apartheid in south Africa. Their last factor is internal and external organisation and they believe that religions with a strong centralized source of authority have more chance of affecting events. In conclusion, many sociologists such as functionalists and Marxists would argue that religion doesn't affect social change and is a conservative force. Functionalists would say religious does this by keeping social solidarity in tact which prevents people needing a change; they also describe people of having a value consensus which is the shared beliefs in society which prevent social change. Marxists would argue that religion is ideological apparatus which distracts the working class from oppression and distracts people from seeing a need for social change. However internationalists would disagree as they see religion as causing radical changes such as the Calvinists being a major factor of the industrial revolution due to their similar ethics. Other sociologists would also argue that religion causes social change such as Neo-Marxist Gramsci, who claims religion is a relative autonomy and allows change to take place. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Sociological Differentiation & Stratification section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Sociological Differentiation & Stratification essays

  1. Peer reviewed

    Evaluate Sociological Explanations of the Relationship between Religion & Social Change

    4 star(s)

    Marxist theory on religion does share certain aspects of Functionalism; this is they both see religion as a conservative force which inhibits social change, however where Marxism differs is they argue religion only works in favour of the ruling classes.

  2. Peer reviewed

    Evaluate the Contribution Marxists Have made in Understanding the Role religion plays in Society

    3 star(s)

    Liberation theology is the fusion of Christianity and Marxism and can be used for radical change. For example, liberation theology in Latin America has brought elements of the Catholic Church into direct conflict with vested interests; deliberately using religion in an attempt to change wider society.

  1. Peer reviewed

    Using material from item A and elsewhere, assess the contribution of religion to social ...

    3 star(s)

    Liberal theology set out to change society. Priests took the lead in educating the poor about their situation. During the 1970's, Catholic priests resisted 'state terror' (when the state goes against its own people) and were the only ones to take the side of the oppressed. In Christianity, Millenarian Movements refers to the idea that Christ would

  2. Free essay

    Is religion a conservative force or a force for social change?

    Marxist sociologist Karl Marx supports the idea of religion being a conservative force through the key ideas of religion maintaining the status quo and preventing social change through false class consciousness. He argues that religion creates a false class consciousness by conditioning the way people think and therefore limiting the

  1. Analyse and Evaluate the relationships between religion and social change.

    Evidence supporting this would be that Christian churches were involved in the other throw of Marxism in Eastern Europe, similar evidence in different situations such as liberation theology supporting radical political movements for change in Latin America, Islamic fundamentalism being the basis of opposition to the Soviet involvement in Afghanistan in the 1980s also support Weber's argument.

  2. Sociologists who have studied the role of religion in society, and perhaps more specifically ...

    The British Industrial Revolution is an example of where religious movements grew in times of anomie. Functionalist also see religion as a way to relieve the stress on life-changing events by providing meaning and religious rites of passage, which without such, can undermine people's commitment to the wider society and therefore, maximising social disruption and controlling social order.

  1. Assess the view that religion was once mainly a conservative force but today is ...

    they demonstrated groups marginalised by society and unable to achieve in a traditional church seeking other ways of gaining self esteem. However, religions such as Islam and Christianity encourage helping the poor and donations towards charitable causes, which indicates that religion can act as a force for change as it

  2. Religion can be both a conservative force and an initiator of social change to ...

    These Values formally and informally control our social behavior. for example some of the 10 commandments have become part in law (do not steal) and some have become part of moral actions (Respect your father and mother). However, different religions and religious beliefs and values can tear people and communities apart, and pose threats to social order and stability.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work