• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Assess the pluralist view of media ownership

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

´╗┐PLURALISM on media ownership Pluralists hold a positive view of the media ownership, arguing the media owners are impartial due to economic reasons and reflecting audience?s demand. Pluralists also argue it is practically impossible for the owners to interfere with the media content to impose their bias. Instead, media owners reflect the interests of the audiences, who actively shape the media output by demanding certain content. However, Marxists note that in reality the media content reflects capitalist values of the media owners who come from the ruling class background and use the media to promote their ideology, which according to Neo-Marxists comes naturally to owners and editors who are educated into acceptance of a particular set of values. Pluralism argues that media operates in free market societies, thus its output is subject to competition and audience needs rather than values of the owners of the media companies. BLONDEL argues that the media is constrained by the market in which no single group had a monopoly of power, thus its content is dictated by the economic reality. ...read more.

Middle

Murdoch arguing in favour of the Iraq war and all of his newspapers around the world backing his views proves this point. Neo-Marxists have a slightly different explanation to why such interference occurs, citing similar educational backgrounds of journalists and editors that naturally force them into acceptance of hegemonic values of the ruling class without necessarily making them actively wanting to impose their ideology onto the audiences. Nonetheless, people like Murdoch are not representative of all media owners, who in fact do not take such a prominent role in determining the media output; some media are owned by trusts (eg. The Guardian), which diminishes the possibility of the owners? intervention. Pluralism argues the media owners want to satisfy and maintain the audiences, and they try to do so by producing a diverse range of media content with a wide representation of views. Pluralists thus argue the media companies producing niche material merely do so according the audience demands, not in an attempt to exclude some audiences. ...read more.

Conclusion

Representation of the views of active audiences, who, according to Pluralists, shape the media output, is the key element of upholding democracy. Even though Murdoch?s influence on his media may be seen as undemocratic, it can alternatively be considered democratic, according to WHALE. He argues that by transforming the Sun, Murdoch gave the consumers what they wanted, thus represented their views. However, it does not outweigh the significance of close cooperation between Murdoch and high profile politicians, which inevitably leads to some views being more prioritised. Nonetheless, Pluralists note the importance of investigative journalism in preventing the dominance of the powerful. The importance of Washington Post journalists in the Watergate scandal proves this power. In conclusion, Pluralists view of the media ownership is rather too positive. While focusing on how the media represents a plurality of views due to economic importance of audience demand, Pluralists overlook the importance of concentration of media ownership. Given the Marxist and Neo-Marxist take on the negative consequences of concentration of media ownership, the main Pluralist arguments about representativeness and impartiality do not stand up to scrutiny. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Media section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Media essays

  1. Assess the Pluralist theory of the media and ownership

    Thus there is a divorce between ownership and control, this is also due to the presence of chief executive officers and shareholders. Burnham's notion is evidently strongly in favour of Pluralists and possesses many valid points. Marxists on the other hand would agree with the statement that media controllers are influenced by the owners.

  2. Assess the pluralists view on media ownership

    However through another theory Marxism it can be argued that even if someone from the working class can express their view, there will always be someone higher up than that person (bourgeoisies)

  1. Moral Panic and media folk devils.

    Harry Potter was slated by religious groups in America on arrival and since the release of the film it has also started in the U.K. The wizardry involved and the idea of the evil and dark magic has been said to encourage children into performing the dark rituals involved.

  2. How is Crime represented in the Media

    This represents no change from the level of crime based on interviews in 2004/05 * There were 5.6 million crimes recorded by the police in 2005/06, a fall of one per cent compared with 2004/05 * The 2005/06 BCS showed the risk of being a victim of crime at 23

  1. The issue of media ownership is a complex one and therefore, I look to ...

    Thus, it would seem that they are also able to bring benefits towards diversity through a greater range of content. This leads to the argument that pluralism "depends not only on a diversity of ownership but on a range of other interrelated variables" (Gilliam Doyle, 2002).

  2. Do the Media have the power to shape public opinion?

    Heidegger denied acidicburn83's functionalism . Every detail is so firmly stamped with sameness that nothing can appear which is not marked at birth, or does not meet approval at first sight.'[2] The worst perpetrator of such a crime is the sound film that captures so much of the attention that there is very little room for interaction or thought.

  1. CENSORSHIP - A Liberal and Conservative View

    The obvious reason to this being that everyone is entitled to their opinion whether that opinion may include vulgarity or not. A Liberal will therefore say something of the sort: If a man can preach on television about the goodness of God, then a man can surely preach on the f*ing a*holes that rule their sh*hole of a country!

  2. What do the Pluralists say about the media generally?

    Individuals can accept, challenge or reject these sources of information. The media themselves are relatively independent in respect of the state, political parties, pressure groups. They are also relatively autonomous in their production of media content. Rather than serving the interests of class capitalism, the control of the media rests with a managerial elite who allow a degree of flexibility.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work