• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Assess the right realist view that crime is the result of biological rational factors and therefore best solved by formal social control.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Assess the right realist view that crime is the result of biological rational factors and therefore best solved by formal social In this essay, discussed is the causes and solutions for crime according to right and left realists. The questions answered are going to be, is crime a real problem or is it socially constructed according to the labelling theory or is the root cause of crime the fact that society is unequal or that control and punishment isn't strong enough. Discussed in this essay is going to be right realist ideas on society into crime and deviance. This will come from the likes of James Q Wilson and Richard J. Hernstein who believe that that crime is caused by a combination of biology and social factors. Charles Murray however believes that most crime comes from the underclass (working class people behaving in an anti social way, so one believes that people are socialised into crime. One other right realist theory is Ron Clarke's idea that people decide whether to commit crime or not based on weighing up the costs and benefits, called the Rational Choice Theory. The final theory is the tacking crime theory which was devised by Wilson and Kelling in an article 'broken windows' who believes that it is essential to maintain an ordered society as any sign of deterioration could cause further crime. On the other side of the argument, discussed will be the left realist view who see society as an unequal capitalist one. However, unlike Marxists left realists would like to reform than revolutionise. Discussed from the left realist theories so going to be Young and Lea who believe they have the answer to why crime is caused. One believed that it was a combination or relative depravation (people who believe they are deprived around others) and individualism which are the desire for freedom. These pair of sociologists believes that these two combined make a lethal combination. ...read more.

Middle

They say that any sign of deterioration, such as graffiti or vandalism must be dealt with immediately. The pair advocates a 'zero tolerance' policy towards undesirable behaviour such as prostitution, begging and drunkenness. The role of the police should be to focus on controlling the streets so that law-abiding citizens feel safe. Crime prevention policies should reduce the rewards and increase the costs of crime to the offender, for example by 'target hardening' (making public places more difficult to break into), greater use of prison and ensuring punishments follow soon after the offence to maximise their deterrent effect. There are some criticisms of Wilson and Kelling's idea of advocating a zero tolerance policy due to the fact that it gives police a free rein to discriminate against ethnic minority youth, the homeless and people underprivileged. It also results in displacement of crime to other areas. One theorists Jones notes that right realist policies in the USA failed to prevent the crime rate rising. It also overemphasises control of disorder, rather than tackling underlying causes of neighbourhood decline such as a lack of investment. Having such a formal control such as longer prison sentences and zero tolerance can have a negative impact on people having respect to society. Lower class may riot as they have not got the freedom to live with the police and CCTV watching them move. However, unlike other right realist ideas that are preoccupied with petty street crime and ignores corporate crime, which may be more costly and harmful to the public. The broken windows idea is where it is the petty street crimes that lead on to the deterioration of society which leads onto larger crimes such as prostitution and drug dealing. Left realists unlike right realists believe we need to develop explanations of crime that will lead to practical strategies for reducing crime. Lea and Young identify two related causes of crime: relative depravation and individualism. ...read more.

Conclusion

Young and Lea described crime being committed due to a combination of both relative depravation and individualism. The pair believes that these two combined make a lethal combination for discontent which leads to crime amongst other things. Young also described subcultures and say that they are aiming for the goals of mainstream society, however they can't achieve it legitimately, but have to immerse into the 'American Dream' illegitimately. Marginalisation is also a big contributing factor with the lower class that lack clear goals and organisations which leads to resentment and frustration leading onto violence and rioting. Young also believes that we are living in a late modern stage we are moving away from unskilled labour (working class jobs) so that they are turning unemployed. This means that they are getting excluded from society from the middle and upper class. Finally, to prevent crime, the left realist believe that police do not have a very big impact on society but it needs all the agencies to work together in order for crime to decline and a more informal social control. In answer to the essay question it has been argued that left wing realists perspectives on how to solve crime are useful, however in modern society it is very hard to get rid of relative depravation which they believe is on of the main cause. In Britain, the minimum wage and housing has never been better and to tackle crime, one idea from the left realists is to give them better housing condition and better jobs. However, with the housing getting better and the increase in pay, the lower class are able to live much better lives than what the left realists say. The right realist's perspectives are better at providing answers to why and how people commit crime due to the fact that harsher prison sentences and zero tolerance policies would deter criminals who have either committed a crime, or about to commit one. Ron Clarke's rational choice theory in particular has demonstrated why people would commit a crime by weighing out the costs and benefits. ?? ?? ?? ?? Charlie Thompson ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Crime & Deviance section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Crime & Deviance essays

  1. Sociological Theories on Crime and Deviance

    Most often, deviant identities emerge over time. A drug addict may not think of himself/herself as a junkie until she realises she no longer has any non-using friends. In this example, the development of a deviant identity is gradual, but deviant identities can also develop suddenly. A person who becomes disabled as the result of an accident may be given a deviant label.

  2. Assess The Contribution Of Control Theory To Our Understanding Of Crime And Criminality

    Control theory seems to be regarded as an explanation for non serious offences and especially for those carried out by the age group, between the mid teens to early twenties, the delinquent years. Nye, Reckless and Hirschi concentrated on delinquent crime causation for their theories.

  1. Free essay

    Assess the view that crime and deviance is the result of labelling, the media ...

    The labelling theory shows that the law is not a fixed set of rules to be taken for granted, but something whose construction we need to explain. It shows that the law is often enforced in discriminatory ways and that crime statistics are more of a record of the activities

  2. Crime: Social construction or reality?

    Three per cent of the total crimes constituted robbery and theft. The media was uninterested in the other 97 per cent of crimes. For the 3 per cent of robbery and theft, 55 per cent of those offenders were black.

  1. Assess the value of the right realist approach to crime and deviance

    low intelligence, and low impulse control that could put them at greater risk of offending. Inadequate socialisation may also contribute to the risk of an individual offending, since it is supposed to teach self-control and internalise values of right and wrong.

  2. Assess the usefulness of realist explanations of crime and deviance

    He also recommends that people should be penalised for having births outside of marriage and that the idea of marriage and the nuclear family should be reinforced. He believes that without these changes taking place, the underclass will continue to reproduce its self from generation to generation.

  1. Examine the role of formal and informal social control in controlling individuals

    For example, if someone has received a fine from committing vandalism, it is thought that they would not do it again as paying a fine may have shown that being a vandal wasn't worth it. For example, when the Zero Tolerance policy was adopted in New York, it showed that

  2. The Justice and welfare debate.

    the young persons offending behaviour in the first place were not being addressed. In 1997 The New Labour Government came to power and tackling youth crime became one of their main priorities. This was shown in the record time that its youth justice legislation hit the statute books (Goldson B, 2000:5).

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work