• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Assess the right realist view that crime is the result of biological rational factors and therefore best solved by formal social control.

Extracts from this document...


Assess the right realist view that crime is the result of biological rational factors and therefore best solved by formal social In this essay, discussed is the causes and solutions for crime according to right and left realists. The questions answered are going to be, is crime a real problem or is it socially constructed according to the labelling theory or is the root cause of crime the fact that society is unequal or that control and punishment isn't strong enough. Discussed in this essay is going to be right realist ideas on society into crime and deviance. This will come from the likes of James Q Wilson and Richard J. Hernstein who believe that that crime is caused by a combination of biology and social factors. Charles Murray however believes that most crime comes from the underclass (working class people behaving in an anti social way, so one believes that people are socialised into crime. One other right realist theory is Ron Clarke's idea that people decide whether to commit crime or not based on weighing up the costs and benefits, called the Rational Choice Theory. The final theory is the tacking crime theory which was devised by Wilson and Kelling in an article 'broken windows' who believes that it is essential to maintain an ordered society as any sign of deterioration could cause further crime. On the other side of the argument, discussed will be the left realist view who see society as an unequal capitalist one. However, unlike Marxists left realists would like to reform than revolutionise. Discussed from the left realist theories so going to be Young and Lea who believe they have the answer to why crime is caused. One believed that it was a combination or relative depravation (people who believe they are deprived around others) and individualism which are the desire for freedom. These pair of sociologists believes that these two combined make a lethal combination. ...read more.


They say that any sign of deterioration, such as graffiti or vandalism must be dealt with immediately. The pair advocates a 'zero tolerance' policy towards undesirable behaviour such as prostitution, begging and drunkenness. The role of the police should be to focus on controlling the streets so that law-abiding citizens feel safe. Crime prevention policies should reduce the rewards and increase the costs of crime to the offender, for example by 'target hardening' (making public places more difficult to break into), greater use of prison and ensuring punishments follow soon after the offence to maximise their deterrent effect. There are some criticisms of Wilson and Kelling's idea of advocating a zero tolerance policy due to the fact that it gives police a free rein to discriminate against ethnic minority youth, the homeless and people underprivileged. It also results in displacement of crime to other areas. One theorists Jones notes that right realist policies in the USA failed to prevent the crime rate rising. It also overemphasises control of disorder, rather than tackling underlying causes of neighbourhood decline such as a lack of investment. Having such a formal control such as longer prison sentences and zero tolerance can have a negative impact on people having respect to society. Lower class may riot as they have not got the freedom to live with the police and CCTV watching them move. However, unlike other right realist ideas that are preoccupied with petty street crime and ignores corporate crime, which may be more costly and harmful to the public. The broken windows idea is where it is the petty street crimes that lead on to the deterioration of society which leads onto larger crimes such as prostitution and drug dealing. Left realists unlike right realists believe we need to develop explanations of crime that will lead to practical strategies for reducing crime. Lea and Young identify two related causes of crime: relative depravation and individualism. ...read more.


Young and Lea described crime being committed due to a combination of both relative depravation and individualism. The pair believes that these two combined make a lethal combination for discontent which leads to crime amongst other things. Young also described subcultures and say that they are aiming for the goals of mainstream society, however they can't achieve it legitimately, but have to immerse into the 'American Dream' illegitimately. Marginalisation is also a big contributing factor with the lower class that lack clear goals and organisations which leads to resentment and frustration leading onto violence and rioting. Young also believes that we are living in a late modern stage we are moving away from unskilled labour (working class jobs) so that they are turning unemployed. This means that they are getting excluded from society from the middle and upper class. Finally, to prevent crime, the left realist believe that police do not have a very big impact on society but it needs all the agencies to work together in order for crime to decline and a more informal social control. In answer to the essay question it has been argued that left wing realists perspectives on how to solve crime are useful, however in modern society it is very hard to get rid of relative depravation which they believe is on of the main cause. In Britain, the minimum wage and housing has never been better and to tackle crime, one idea from the left realists is to give them better housing condition and better jobs. However, with the housing getting better and the increase in pay, the lower class are able to live much better lives than what the left realists say. The right realist's perspectives are better at providing answers to why and how people commit crime due to the fact that harsher prison sentences and zero tolerance policies would deter criminals who have either committed a crime, or about to commit one. Ron Clarke's rational choice theory in particular has demonstrated why people would commit a crime by weighing out the costs and benefits. ?? ?? ?? ?? Charlie Thompson ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Crime & Deviance section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Crime & Deviance essays

  1. Sociological Theories on Crime and Deviance

    Deviant identity is the definition a person has of himself or herself as a deviant. The formation of a deviant identity, like other identities, involves a process of social transformation in which a new self-image and new public definition of a person emerges. Most often, deviant identities emerge over time.

  2. Crime: Social construction or reality?

    The headline of The Daily Mail of the 11th March 1982 stated "Black Crime: The Alarming Figures. The statistics proved half of the offenders were white but this was not mentioned. The newspaper targets black males and exaggerates the street crime problem.

  1. Marxism is a structural theory, as people's actions are shaped by society and in ...

    Thus, in low- income areas of society the mugger and petty thief use what they have got to get what they can. In higher income brackets, business people, lawyers and politicians have a more effective means at their disposal and can grab a 'larger piece of the cake'.

  2. Crime and its effects on society. Police Reform Act 2002 The police ...

    Anti-Social Behaviour Act 2003 This will effect mainly the offenders because they will be cracked down on even if there is suspicion that they will commit something that will damage society, for example it gives the police power to

  1. Examine the differences between Muslims living in the UK and Muslims living in Saudi ...

    whereas in the UK you are merely sentenced to a few years imprisonment, if that. Take the example of a person who stole an item from a shop. That person would have their hand chopped off if they were living in Saudi Arabia whereas in the UK they would get have to spend a few years in prison.

  2. Critically Compare and Contrast Functionalist and Traditional Marxist Perspectives On Crime.

    standards we lax or breached it cannot be compared to a more personal killing on a street corner in the dead of night? Marxist view on this is to say that laws are in place only to apply to those less fortunate in society and are in place to protect the hierarchy against blame.

  1. The Strengths and Limitations of Left Realism and Right Realism Theories in Explaining Crime ...

    in explaining crime and deviance and he and Hernstein claim that there is substantial biological element in causing crime. They argue that some individuals are born with a predisposition towards crime and a lack of or incorrect socialisation as a child could mean that their potential for criminal behaviours is more readily realised.

  2. Assess the value of the right realist approach to crime and deviance

    low intelligence, and low impulse control that could put them at greater risk of offending. Inadequate socialisation may also contribute to the risk of an individual offending, since it is supposed to teach self-control and internalise values of right and wrong.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work