• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Assess the sociological views of the relationship between the family and industrialisation

Extracts from this document...


´╗┐Assess the sociological views of the relationship between the family and industrialisation Most sociological debates of family diversity have centred around three questions. Firstly, is the nuclear family universal, Secondly, is the nuclear group the only one that can carry out the vital functions of the family, and thirdly what is the link between the nuclear family structure and industrial society, did the nuclear family break away from this extended family system as a result of industrialization? The relationship between family structure and industrialisation remains a popular question, as it is linking the family with social change. ?Pre Industrialisation? refers back to the society before industrialisation, it was largely agricultural and work was centred at the home, people were given ascribed occupational roles this was known as the domestic industry. Family during the time was extended commonly and played a major role in looking after dependent children and had main responsibility for health and welfare of the young, and those of old age who couldn?t work. ...read more.


Parsons said because of this, the industrial nuclear family was ?isolated?. Growth in people?s wealth reduced their dependence on kin for support in times of distress. There was a growth in meritocracy in the industrial societies; the status of an individual in the pre-industrial society was ascribed meaning that it was decided at birth by the family they were born into. Parson believed that in the industrial society, the individual?s status was achieved by the person?s success meaning you had to achieve an occupational status on the basis of talent, skill and educational qualifications in society outside of the family. This means that the nuclear family was essentially the best for allowing individuals to achieve status and position without conflict. People were able to better themselves as they aspired themselves to achieve a higher status then the previous generation with improved education. Parsons also believed specialised roles had developed through the nuclear family. Men carried an ?instrumental role? and women were the ?expressive leaders? in the family, he thought this came about as it was more effective for society. ...read more.


Individuals left home to work and women staged at home and had strong extended kinship networks. Then the third stage was family was based on consumption not production, the family were buying things rather than making them. The nuclear family they found was focused on its lifestyles and personal relationships, this was called ?the symmetrical family? the husband and wife had joint roles. Young and Willmott found improved living standards for example washing machines instead of hand washing, the decline of the close-knit extended family, improved status of women, and weaker gender identities (where women could do what men could do whereas before women weren?t expected to do much) lead to families becoming equal. Young and Willmott?s could be criticised by conflict theorists for not addressing the negative aspects of changes, as their theory seems to suggest that family life gets better. Feminists criticise their view on the division of labour, as they believe it?s inaccurate to talk about a symmetrical family, because it implies that men and women now do the same jobs, which is not the case for Radical feminists, women are ?takers of shit? because men benefit from women?s unpaid domestic labour. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Family & Marriage section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Here's what a teacher thought of this essay

3 star(s)

This essay starts well and has a good description of Parsons' views and some excellent counterarguments. However, the essay ignores other Functionalist theorists, Marxist theory and distinctly lacks any overall conclusions and evaluations.

Marked by teacher Matthew Wilkin 04/04/2013

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Family & Marriage essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Examine the factors affecting the domestic division of labour and power relations between couples.

    4 star(s)

    Sociologists such as Oakley have argued that women have increasingly taken on a dual burden. This is when women work and do the everyday chores such as childcare and household chores. As Gershuny points out, this could lead to increased inequality between husband and wives, as a rising number of women suffer from dual burden.

  2. Marked by a teacher

    Examine the View that the Family is a Universal Institution

    3 star(s)

    common in Africa or that men had no jobs so the women kept the family. In my opinion, this is a family because the children are being looked after by their mother who is a blood relative. They are still a lone parent family, which in my eyes is a family.

  1. Examine the effects of industrialization on the structure of the family

    Although other sociologist like Laslett(1972 )found evidence that the pre-industrial three generational families that parson claimed to have existed in the pre-industrial era did not really exist. Because he found that the average in household side was around 4.75%.According to Laslett this was due to either late child birth or


    Also There was a growing distinction between children's and adults' clothing. Family life by the 19th century began to be more child-centered and children were the main focus of the society as a whole. Aries argues that we have moved from a world that did not see childhood as in anyway special, to a world that is obsessed with childhood.

  1. Assess the view that the nuclear family is no longer the norm

    Clare Holdsworth and David Morgan use this approach to examine the different paths that young people take when they leave home, in relation to when they become fully independent and how their decisions are influenced by others. Subsequently, life course analysis focuses on the meaning that people give to decisions and events in their lives.

  2. Assess the Functionalist view that the nuclear family is the best fit for society.

    The Bourgeoisie are more likely to be in favour of the nuclear family because they have an lot of wealth and have no need for extra financial support, however the Proletariat would be more in favour of having an extended family because they need the extra support financially the Marxists are on the side of the Proletariat.

  1. Assess the view that marriage is no longer a popular institution in todays postmodernist ...

    Most people still live in a family; most children are bought up by couples; most couples marry and many divorcees re-marry. Nevertheless, the number of marriages have decreased, and the number of couples cohabiting continues to increase and is the fastest growing family type in the UK with over two million couples now cohabiting.

  2. Assess sociological explanations of the nature and extent of family diversity today

    The first fact is that as individual social factors, we make choices about our family life and relationships. Structural approaches wrongly assume that our actions are shaped and dictated by the 'needs of society'. The second fact is that we now have so much greater choice about our personal relationships,

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work