• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Assess the Strengths and Weaknesses of the Different Aims of Punishment

Extracts from this document...


Assess the Strengths and Weaknesses of the Different Aims of Punishment The definition of crime is "breaking the laws set by the State" and the general agreement of people is that if someone commits a crime they should be punished in some way. Punishment practices are ancient; we accept them without question. However, punishment requires justification, as it is an infliction of pain upon an individual. What is the justification of punishment? What are its aims? Before the aims of punishment can be discussed why people commit crimes should be examined to further understand how we should punish. Some people believe that all human actions are caused by factors outside human control, these people are "hard determinists". John Locke, a philosopher, believed moral choice was an illusion. He gave the example of a man sleeping in a locked room, man wakes and decides to stay in the room, he thinks he has a free choice to do so but he does not know it is locked. His ignorance makes him believe he has a choice. This relates to punishment and punishment must presuppose moral blame. No person can be held morally blameworthy if they have no freedom of choice. This suggests punishment is irrelevant as no one can be held responsible for his or her actions. ...read more.


It can be seen, as "utilitarian" in its outlook as it aims to have an improving effect on people, which in turn will benefit Society. In the Bible God punishes to reform the wicked "happy indeed is the man who God corrects". In the 19th Century Christians used solitary confinement to achieve rehabilitation. Criminals had time to think about their evil deeds and repent. Prisoners were shut away from each other and cared for by chaplains. The Reformation and Rehabilitation theory disagreed with other ideas of the aims of punishment as they see prisons as a place where criminals enhance their criminal skills. How can you teach someone to be free when they are behind bars? The Reform and Rehabilitation theory believes in alternatives to traditional punishment, for example, probation, parole and community service, the latter even benefits society. An advocate of this theory was Crook. He saw punishment and crime as the responsibility of society. He suggested that everyone is responsible for the actions, but they are influenced by society. He believed it was possible to predict person's actions so therefore society should share in the responsibility for the offender's crime. He saw our legal system as wrong as individuals pay the price at the hands of our system. He believed society must pay the price of correcting these dangerous and destructive situations. ...read more.


For example 57% of men and 40% of women discharged from prison in 1987 re offended in two years. The figures for probation and community service were 56% men, 37% women, 55% men, and 41% women re offended. The re-offending rate of prisoners is more than those in community service but not on a large enough scale to make a difference. This theory is supposed to be about reform but the way criminals are "cured" by mind altering drugs, surgery or brain washing is not reform. It is just creating a brand new person. The criminal loses the right to be him or herself in that case. C.S Lewis also stated his humanitarian theory, that in rehabilitation and reform the criminal becomes the case and not a person subject to rights. I believe that the most feasible of the aims of punishment is that put forward by Moberly and Hospers. Their views of compromise seem to be a very logical aim of punishment. Their ideas do not "over punish" criminals nor do they leave the victims feeling as if justice has not been served. Moberly also suggests that in some cases punishment may not be necessary. Retributivists however, may advocate punishment is a duty in all circumstances, but surely if in a particular case punishment would probably make matters worse and an alternative action, for example kindness, would improve matters, the morally right course of action would be the latter. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Crime & Deviance section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Crime & Deviance essays

  1. Critically compare the three main theories of deviance and assess their strengths & weaknesses

    The result is an unbalanced society where winning is all and the 'rules' are not very important. This situation of 'normlessness' is known as anomie. Individuals may respond in different ways: * Conformity The most common response is conformity. Conformists strive for success through the accepted channels.

  2. Punishment and Prisons. This essay shall describe the changes in the methods of punishment ...

    or detention centers in which individuals are physically confined or interned by a third party that is 'contracted' by a local, state or federal government agency, (Wikipedia).

  1. subcultural theory

    They strive for success by means of accepted channels. Another response is innovation. Innovation is when a person turns to deviance to achieve their goals. Merton argues that members of the lower strata are more likely to choose this road to success.

  2. Free essay

    Theory of Utility

    This overall happiness is not found in revenge for the crime committed although that would conform to the principle of utility4 but is justified on the grounds of deterrence. It is a forward-looking theory that seeks to deter future crimes of the same nature and consequently prevent and reduce crime.

  1. Punishment is difficult to apply in the workplace. Explain why, what might be done ...

    individuals thinking become fixed on past errors rather than on searching for a correct solution. An example looked here would be when a new employee gives the name of his new department incorrectly in a public meeting he will be so humiliated that he repeats the same mistake again and again as humiliation prevents him from thinking anything else.

  2. Using the example of violent crime show the strengths and weaknesses of police recorded ...

    has shown that only 48% of violent incidents are reported (Muncie 2001 p23), therefore it can be said that despite the combination of figures being more reliable than single statistics these figures are still limited. According to the Home Office the comparison of recorded crime and the BCS "provides a

  1. Evaluation argument on corporal punishment in schools.

    According to Gershoff (39), corporal punishment is associated with an increase in aggression in Singapore. The emotional and psychological impacts lead to poor academic performance in schools. The practice of corporal punishment indirectly teaches children that violence is a solution to problems.


    All participants will be asked set questions which I have organized; the questions asked will be focused on my research questions and research objectives. I will hand out questionnaires at the end. The potential user of the research can vary from youths in care, young people as a whole, family

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work