• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Assess the usefulness of functionalist theories in explaining crime and deviance

Extracts from this document...


´╗┐Assess the usefulness of functionalist theories in explaining crime and deviance (21 Marks) The functionalist approach to analysing deviance and the causes of crime looks at society as a whole. It explains crime and deviance by saying that the source of deviance lies in the nature of society itself rather than in psychology or biology. It should be noted that functionalists see deviance as an inevitable and necessary part of society. Some also consider deviance to have positive aspects for society. In this essay we will assess the usefulness of these functionalist theories, and look at how it helps us explain crime and deviance. ...read more.


The punishment of the offenders can act as a deterrent to others. This is through things such as public humiliation and punishments such as public execution. Also, the criminal justice system creates a ?spectacle? which portrays crime as wrong. However, there are problems with Durkheim?s theory. This is because there is no way to tell what is ?too much? crime to be useful and what is the ?right amount of crime? for society. Durkheim also suggested that it was possible for people to use their power to change laws about what is seen as crime and deviance. This is through things such as the media with regards to rape within marriage, the rights of the woman etc. ...read more.


Not everyone who commits a crime is doing it to earn money. Where does this fit into Merton?s theory? Some people were brought up with crime and turn to crime as a way of life. Others take drugs or steal just for the ?fun? of it. There are problems with each Functionalist approach to assessing crime and deviance in society as what fits on criminal and one crime doesn?t necessarily fit another. Therefore, what causes crime can?t be properly defined in society, especially since society is constantly changing, as are the norms and values within society. We can conclude by saying that functionalist theories are useful to describe crime and deviance, to a certain extent. It does have more flaws than positives. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Crime & Deviance section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Crime & Deviance essays

  1. Sociological Theories on Crime and Deviance

    her, and turning to prostitution - a type of innovative deviance - is a likely result. The stockbroker who engages in illegal insider trading constitutes another example of innovative deviance: The cultural goals (wealth) is accepted, but non-traditional means (insider trading)

  2. Outline and Assess Subcultural Theories of Crime and Deviance

    Yet, Miller provides little evidence of these specific middle class values. Box (1981) highlights that the values could equally apply to males right across the class structure. Also, female deviancy is not considered again! One consistent criticism of subcultural theories is that there is little evidence to demonstrate this distinct set of antisocial values.

  1. Assess the usefulness of consensus theories for an understanding of crime and deviance in ...

    He noted that whilst chasing the 'American Dream', some people were less likely to succeed using legitimate means than others, which would result in strain being placed upon them. For these individuals crime would be the only way of achieving the 'American Dream'.

  2. Critically Compare and Contrast Functionalist and Traditional Marxist Perspectives On Crime.

    into crime due to unfair laws only suiting the purpose of the wealthy and more privileged. It doesn't explain how someone of a middle class background could fall into and take on a crime spree. There is a belief in the manipulation of values, that laws are created to control

  1. The Strengths and Limitations of Left Realism and Right Realism Theories in Explaining Crime ...

    It is therefore vital to consider them when explaining crime, as all crimes happen in the context of the law enforcement. We must also consider social forces that influence the police. The public and informal social control- How do people react to crime in their community?

  2. Assess the usefulness of realist explanations of crime and deviance

    They also argue that there is an important element of choice where deciding whether or not to commit a crime. In terms of this view, crime reduction means increasing the costs of crime and raising the benefits of conformity. The two measures that will increase the costs of crime are

  1. Assess functionalist theories of crime and deviance.

    Also, Marxists argue that people are selfish but only because Capitalism makes people selfish as it benefits the ruling class by causing class fragmentation and preventing class solidarity. Capitalists also profit financially from consumerism and the hard work people do in order to consume.

  2. Evaluate Functionalist Theories of Crime and Deviance

    Other functionalist theories, including Merton's Strain Theory and Parson's ideas of "Bad Socialization" contradict Durkheim's claim of crime and deviance occurring to create employment- as they see other factors being the principal cause of crime. Parsons views crime and deviance as a product of faulty or "bad" socialization.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work