• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Assess The Usefulness Of Labelling Theories In Understanding Crime and deviance

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

ASSESS THE USEFULNESS OF LABELLING THEORIES IN UNDERSTANDING CRIME AND DEVIANCE Labelling theory suggests that deviancy is a social process usually related to power differences but it doesn't explain the causes of crime. It does however explain why some people or actions are described as deviant, and can help in understanding crime and deviance. Becker suggests that there is really no such thing as a deviant act. An act only becomes deviant when others perceive it as such. The application of a label to someone has significant consequences for how that person is treated by others and perceives him or herself. Lemert drew a distinction between primary and secondary deviance through a study of stuttering amongst a Native American nation. ...read more.

Middle

Labelling theorist explain that some people may have the power to reject a negative label, while others are unable to gain enough resources to deny the negative label and must accept it, causing harsh consequences in later life as they may live up to their label and be treated according to their label. Becker explains that once an individual or group is labelled in a certain way others only see them in terms of that label, he calls this master status, it also causes the individual or group to see themselves in terms of the label. This may produce a self-fulfilling prophecy in which the label makes itself become true. There are many stages in this process, which can help in understanding crime and deviance. ...read more.

Conclusion

Labelling theory also fails to explain why individuals commit deviant acts in the first place, and it assumes that once a person has been labelled their deviance will increase. Individuals might simply choose to be deviant even if they haven't been labelled. It also fails to explain why some people are labelled rather than others and why some activities are against the law and others are not. However, labelling theorists main argument is that deviance and crime are the result of groups imposing their definitions of crime and deviance on others. The process whereby people manage to impose their view in others is through labelling. Overall labelling theory is very useful in understanding crime and deviance. It helps us see why certain acts can become known as deviant and how crime can happen from deviant behaviour. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Crime & Deviance section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Crime & Deviance essays

  1. Sociological Theories on Crime and Deviance

    her, and turning to prostitution - a type of innovative deviance - is a likely result. The stockbroker who engages in illegal insider trading constitutes another example of innovative deviance: The cultural goals (wealth) is accepted, but non-traditional means (insider trading)

  2. Free essay

    Assess the view that crime and deviance is the result of labelling, the media ...

    However, there are some negative points of Becker's idea that something is wrong by the content. It implies that without labelling, deviance would not exist. This leads to the strange conclusion that someone who commits a crime but is not labelled has not deviated.

  1. Compare and Contrast the Main Sociological Theories of Deviance.

    The idea of young working class males committing more crime can be supported by David Matza's study on juvenile delinquency. He suggested that people tend to stick to their own norms and values in the society which will lead to a subculture.

  2. Assess the usefulness of realist explanations of crime and deviance

    victims, the offenders, the reaction of formal agencies of the state e.g. the police and the response of the public and the nature of informal methods of social control. They believe that it is people, victims, living in inner city areas that are most at risk of being harmed by

  1. Critically compare the three main theories of deviance and assess their strengths & weaknesses

    Evaluation of Merton 1. Taylor criticises Merton for failing to consider wider power relations in society - that is, who actually makes the laws and who benefits from them. 2. Merton assumes that there is a value consensus in American society and that people only because of structural strain in society.

  2. Critically assess labelling theories contribution to the sociological understanding of crime and deviance. This ...

    the sequence of his explanation it is possible that the deviant will re-enter conventional society. Lemmert also uses the interactionist perspective in his view of labelling, outlining primary and secondary deviance, primary being the act before it is publicly labelled and secondary being the response of the individual or 'deviant' to the reactions of others in society.

  1. What have theories of deviance added to our understanding of crime? Why are there ...

    Others think that deviance is a product of mental disease - in the same way that one cannot help being diabetic, you cannot help being homosexual or addicted to drugs. However, surely the stated factors, particularly the latter one, must be influenced to some extent by society, since an individual is not born as a drug addict.

  2. Outline and Assess Subcultural Theories of Crime and Deviance

    The third form is Ritualism, this is when the means are used by the individual, but sight of the actual goal is lost, for example a traffic warden, who is not bothered about earning lots of money, but blindly enforces the law without looking at the nature of justice.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work