• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Assess The Usefulness Of Labelling Theories In Understanding Crime and deviance

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

ASSESS THE USEFULNESS OF LABELLING THEORIES IN UNDERSTANDING CRIME AND DEVIANCE Labelling theory suggests that deviancy is a social process usually related to power differences but it doesn't explain the causes of crime. It does however explain why some people or actions are described as deviant, and can help in understanding crime and deviance. Becker suggests that there is really no such thing as a deviant act. An act only becomes deviant when others perceive it as such. The application of a label to someone has significant consequences for how that person is treated by others and perceives him or herself. Lemert drew a distinction between primary and secondary deviance through a study of stuttering amongst a Native American nation. ...read more.

Middle

Labelling theorist explain that some people may have the power to reject a negative label, while others are unable to gain enough resources to deny the negative label and must accept it, causing harsh consequences in later life as they may live up to their label and be treated according to their label. Becker explains that once an individual or group is labelled in a certain way others only see them in terms of that label, he calls this master status, it also causes the individual or group to see themselves in terms of the label. This may produce a self-fulfilling prophecy in which the label makes itself become true. There are many stages in this process, which can help in understanding crime and deviance. ...read more.

Conclusion

Labelling theory also fails to explain why individuals commit deviant acts in the first place, and it assumes that once a person has been labelled their deviance will increase. Individuals might simply choose to be deviant even if they haven't been labelled. It also fails to explain why some people are labelled rather than others and why some activities are against the law and others are not. However, labelling theorists main argument is that deviance and crime are the result of groups imposing their definitions of crime and deviance on others. The process whereby people manage to impose their view in others is through labelling. Overall labelling theory is very useful in understanding crime and deviance. It helps us see why certain acts can become known as deviant and how crime can happen from deviant behaviour. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Crime & Deviance section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Crime & Deviance essays

  1. Sociological Theories on Crime and Deviance

    her, and turning to prostitution - a type of innovative deviance - is a likely result. The stockbroker who engages in illegal insider trading constitutes another example of innovative deviance: The cultural goals (wealth) is accepted, but non-traditional means (insider trading)

  2. Free essay

    Assess the view that crime and deviance is the result of labelling, the media ...

    This label sticks and people treat the person differently even if it isn't true. This label then becomes a master status and overrides other labels as friend, neighbour brother etc. Penultimately, the labelled person accepts the label, even if it is not true, their self conception is largely made up of what other people think.

  1. Assess the usefulness of realist explanations of crime and deviance

    The key concept that left realists use to explain why people commit crime is relative deprivation. Relative deprivation is where people see themselves as deprived compared to other people. They argue that it is not the fact that people are deprived that causes the crime, but the way in which people see or perceive deprivation.

  2. Critically compare the three main theories of deviance and assess their strengths & weaknesses

    Most of the theories considered up to now have looked at the factors that supposedly direct the behaviour of deviants. This emphasis on the idea that deviants simply react to external forces is similar to a positivist position. Interactionists take a different approach.

  1. Assess The Contribution Of Control Theory To Our Understanding Of Crime And Criminality

    parents and correct discipline would enable the child to develop a high self control and thus not commit deviant acts. The theory also encompasses the role of other guardians throughout the life of the child, these including teachers, police and the community itself.

  2. Compare and Contrast the Main Sociological Theories of Deviance.

    Chicago sociology directed attention towards the motivations which deviants have. It put forward the idea that there is nothing 'wrong' with deviants, but that they see the world in a different way. They are guided by a distinct set of values.

  1. Critically assess labelling theories contribution to the sociological understanding of crime and deviance. This ...

    the sequence of his explanation it is possible that the deviant will re-enter conventional society. Lemmert also uses the interactionist perspective in his view of labelling, outlining primary and secondary deviance, primary being the act before it is publicly labelled and secondary being the response of the individual or 'deviant' to the reactions of others in society.

  2. Examine critically the contribution of labelling theory to our understanding of deviance.

    Deviant careers according to Browne et.al (2009) stem from an individual getting involved with an organised deviant group who provide a support network and understanding of the deviant identity. Becker (2007) suggests that "social recreation and the amplification of the deviant label produce more deviance than it prevents."

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work