• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Assess the usefulness of participant observation as a research method for sociologists.

Extracts from this document...


Assess the usefulness of participant observation as a research method for sociologists. Ensure you use source material in your answer. Participant observation is where the sociologist joins a group of people and studies their behaviour while participating in the same activities. It can be covert (the group don't know they are being observed and see the sociologist as another member of the group) or overt (the group are aware they are being observed). Interpretists study society by looking at the individuals within the society and then working up to the society as a whole. They believe that society is the product of interaction - meaning when people come together in social groups. Interpretivists prefer methods such as unstructured interviews and observation because these uncover the meanings behind action and emphasise validity. Such methods attempt to see the social world through the eyes of the people who inhabit it by studying their everyday life or by letting those being studied speak for themselves. Interpretivist sociologists believe that it is only by participating fully in the activities of the group that they are studying that they can understand the subject's point of view, their cultural meanings etc. ...read more.


Participant observation prevents this because the researcher can see the person's actual behaviour. This leads to high levels of validity. Participant observation can create a close bond between the researcher and the group under study, and individuals in the group may be prepared to confide in the researcher which makes it excellent for validity. Participant observation takes place over a period of time and allows an understanding of how changes in attitudes and behaviour take place which is again a raise in validity. Participant observation is normally used to obtain research information on hard-to-reach groups, such as drug users, gangs and offenders. Participant observation scores very highly for validity. Positivists would argue that participant observation can lead to bias. This is because the observer can be drawn into the group and start to see things through their eyes. This loses objectivity and therefore validity. The presence of the researcher may make the group act less naturally as they are aware of being studied, unless the researcher is operating covertly which can lead to the ethical issue of deception. Other problems with ethics include how far the researcher should allow themselves to be drawn into the activities of the group - particularly if these activities are immoral of illegal. ...read more.


Another study which used participant observation was James Patrick's a Glasgow gang observed. A 16 year old juvenile offender, Tim, invited James to find out what it was like to be part of the gang. James pretended to be Tim's friend and he had to change his clothes and speech to make sure that he 'looked' like part of the gang. The gang destroyed a library while James was stood on guard duty outside. This is problematic ethically as it was a criminal activity and James could have been arrested even for being on guard duty. The gang also took drugs which James had to do if he wanted to be convincing as a gang member. He also got involved with the rivalry between gangs which could have cost him his life had a serious fight broken out as the gang members tended to carry a knife. Positivists would use this study to point out the ethics involved with this type of method especially the use of deception and becoming involved with criminal activity, however, interpretivists would argue that it allowed them to get a lot of detailed information about a hard-to-reach group they would never have had access to otherwise. Today, observation tends to be used in conjunction with quantitative methods as part of a triangulation approach. Emma Kitchen ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Sociological Differentiation & Stratification section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Sociological Differentiation & Stratification essays

  1. Assess the strengths and weaknesses of participant observation, as a research method

    For example, John Howard Griffin was a white man in 1959, who used medication and sun lamp treatments to change his skin colour, so he could pass as being black and conducting his observation. He wanted to feel what racism was like from firsthand experience and not just to interview a black person.

  2. Choice of research method. here are various types of research methods available, such ...

    Hence, a sociologist who favors structural approach tends to prefer quantitative research methods such as questionnaires and experiments in studying the social world. On the other hand, interpretivists such as symbolic interactionists see social action can only be understood by interpreting the meanings and motives it is based on, which is unable to be discovered through quantitative methods.

  1. Assess the usefulness of Postal Questionnaires

    For example, if your research is concerned with finding-out the opinions of women on a range of issues, it would be less than useful if an unknown number of the questionnaires sent by the researcher were filled-in by men. Where the researcher is not present, it's always difficult to know whether or not a respondent has understood a question properly.

  2. The Making of a Moonie

    Reasons for Selection of research design (250-300) 351 Barker wanted her findings to be valid so she used four methods. Her Initial Questions were in three stages. The first stage was 'A personal level' to look at the experience of individual Moonies.

  1. Assess the usefulness of Positivist Research

    This guides sociologists towards possible causes and phenomena behind actions. Positivist research is also useful because it tends to be rational and value-free, and the manner in which quantitative research is carried out with a strong emphasis on limiting researcher influence and pressure on results also results in a better set of results.

  2. Examine The Problems That Some Sociologists May Find When Using Participant Observations In Research

    Another disadvantage of using participant observations is the time, money and personal cost it entails. Participant observations can be done over a number of months, during which the researcher is usually cut off from the support of their family and friends, giving them personal stress.

  1. Participant Observation

    The research does not artificially interfere with people's lives and they are free to act as normal. This allows the researcher to gain an insight, which surveys cannot produce. Supporters of this research method argue that compared to other research techniques, it is least likely to lead to sociologists imposing

  2. Assess the usefulness of feminist contributions to our understanding of society today

    moved in to the labour force during the economic boom and out at times of recession. They can be treated as marginal workers in this way because it is assumed their primary role is in the home. Also that women reproduce the labour force through their unpaid domestic labour, both

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work