• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Assess the usefulness of participant observation as a research method for sociologists.

Extracts from this document...


Assess the usefulness of participant observation as a research method for sociologists. Ensure you use source material in your answer. Participant observation is where the sociologist joins a group of people and studies their behaviour while participating in the same activities. It can be covert (the group don't know they are being observed and see the sociologist as another member of the group) or overt (the group are aware they are being observed). Interpretists study society by looking at the individuals within the society and then working up to the society as a whole. They believe that society is the product of interaction - meaning when people come together in social groups. Interpretivists prefer methods such as unstructured interviews and observation because these uncover the meanings behind action and emphasise validity. Such methods attempt to see the social world through the eyes of the people who inhabit it by studying their everyday life or by letting those being studied speak for themselves. Interpretivist sociologists believe that it is only by participating fully in the activities of the group that they are studying that they can understand the subject's point of view, their cultural meanings etc. ...read more.


Participant observation prevents this because the researcher can see the person's actual behaviour. This leads to high levels of validity. Participant observation can create a close bond between the researcher and the group under study, and individuals in the group may be prepared to confide in the researcher which makes it excellent for validity. Participant observation takes place over a period of time and allows an understanding of how changes in attitudes and behaviour take place which is again a raise in validity. Participant observation is normally used to obtain research information on hard-to-reach groups, such as drug users, gangs and offenders. Participant observation scores very highly for validity. Positivists would argue that participant observation can lead to bias. This is because the observer can be drawn into the group and start to see things through their eyes. This loses objectivity and therefore validity. The presence of the researcher may make the group act less naturally as they are aware of being studied, unless the researcher is operating covertly which can lead to the ethical issue of deception. Other problems with ethics include how far the researcher should allow themselves to be drawn into the activities of the group - particularly if these activities are immoral of illegal. ...read more.


Another study which used participant observation was James Patrick's a Glasgow gang observed. A 16 year old juvenile offender, Tim, invited James to find out what it was like to be part of the gang. James pretended to be Tim's friend and he had to change his clothes and speech to make sure that he 'looked' like part of the gang. The gang destroyed a library while James was stood on guard duty outside. This is problematic ethically as it was a criminal activity and James could have been arrested even for being on guard duty. The gang also took drugs which James had to do if he wanted to be convincing as a gang member. He also got involved with the rivalry between gangs which could have cost him his life had a serious fight broken out as the gang members tended to carry a knife. Positivists would use this study to point out the ethics involved with this type of method especially the use of deception and becoming involved with criminal activity, however, interpretivists would argue that it allowed them to get a lot of detailed information about a hard-to-reach group they would never have had access to otherwise. Today, observation tends to be used in conjunction with quantitative methods as part of a triangulation approach. Emma Kitchen ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Sociological Differentiation & Stratification section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Sociological Differentiation & Stratification essays

  1. Assess the usefulness of Postal Questionnaires

    It is harder however to say that this form of survey is valid because although the questionnaire is being done away from a researcher, if a person if with friends, relatives or anything similar to that sort of situation, the respondent may answer untruthfully, or if they feel the question

  2. Assess the strengths and weaknesses of participant observation, as a research method

    For example, John Howard Griffin was a white man in 1959, who used medication and sun lamp treatments to change his skin colour, so he could pass as being black and conducting his observation. He wanted to feel what racism was like from firsthand experience and not just to interview a black person.

  1. Choice of research method. here are various types of research methods available, such ...

    Hence, a sociologist who favors structural approach tends to prefer quantitative research methods such as questionnaires and experiments in studying the social world. On the other hand, interpretivists such as symbolic interactionists see social action can only be understood by interpreting the meanings and motives it is based on, which is unable to be discovered through quantitative methods.

  2. Critically Assess Observation Methods.

    postal or telephone surveys such as the homeless. Another advantage of observation methods would be its flexibility. This allows for a quick exploitation of a research opportunity as observation methods do not require large amounts of pre-planning or structuring. This gives observation methods a clear advantage over other methods such

  1. METHODOLGY The research design sets out how the researcher will collect evidence and ...

    questionnaires, aiming to arrive at social laws that can explain the causes of events in the social world - and even to make predictions, as natural science has done. The positivist view was taken by some early sociologists, mainly in the nineteenth century when sociology was striving to be regarded as the equal of the natural sciences.

  2. "How sociologists measure the extent of poverty is largely dependent on what definition of ...

    The interviewees were asked 35 questions and asked whether or not they considered them to be a necessity. This helped to distinguish a 'consensus' view of what the public saw as importance in society. This helped Mack and Lansley see whether people were lacking due to financial constraints rather than

  1. Assess the usefulness of interactionist approaches to the study of society

    we won?t ever know why someone has given us a particular label and by putting ourselves in their shoes we will only be able to assume what the reason is. A major strength with this theory is that it overcomes the determinism of structural theories (are not just simply passive recipients of social forces).

  2. Participant observation studies have little value in sociological research because they are too subjective. ...

    In his study ?Persons under trains? of person who met their death hit by tube trains on London Underground, he found that over 12 month period, they were 32 cases with no strong clues as to reason for the death.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work