• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Assess the usefulness of subcultural theories for an understanding of crime and deviance in society today

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

´╗┐Assess the usefulness of labelling theories for an understanding of crime and deviance in contemporary society Labelling is when a definition is attached to a person and this label defines their life style. The labelling theory focuses on how and why certain acts are defined as deviant. Labelling theorist argue that there is no such thing as a deviant act because no act is deviant within itself. It only becomes a deviant act when someone labels it so. A main strength of the labelling theory is that it doesn?t state that criminals differ from the norm, but rather are the same as everyone else; therefore everyone can become a criminal. A main weakness is that the theory doesn?t explain the reasons for why deviant acts are committed in the first place and why some commit crimes and others don?t. Becker states that a deviant is simply someone to whom the label has been applied to and their act only becomes deviant when society labels it as being criminal. ...read more.

Middle

The other is secondary deviance, this is when the deviant act is publicly labelled and the person sees themselves as a criminal. This involves them being stigmatized and excluded from normal society, so the label ?criminal? becomes their master status. A person?s status of being a deviant will cause a hostile reaction from society and will affect them having a legitimate career. This can lead to a deviant career, where deviant behaviour is encouraged and rewarded; therefore it confirms a deviant identity. This shows that it?s not the act that is deviant, but the social reaction to it and their hostility towards the person. The labelling theory is useful to understand crime and deviance in society because it shows that defining deviance is a complex process, rather than simple. This is due to the fact that if the deviant act isn?t witnessed or punished then the person isn?t labelled as a criminal, but still technically is one, even though others might not see them as deviant. ...read more.

Conclusion

This theory sees deviance as coming from delinquent subcultures, which have different norms and values from mainstream society. These subcultures provide an alternative opportunity structure, as they can?t get it through legitimate means. Therefore in these subcultures, deviant behaviour is seen as normal and it is encouraged. Compared to labelling, the subcultural theory is more useful for understanding crime and deviance because it states the reasons for why people are committing deviant behaviour, which isn?t explained in the labelling theory. However it is less useful because the theory assumes that once in a subculture, you will learn and follow deviant acts, which might not be true for everyone in a subculture. Also not every criminal is part of a subculture; therefore there are might be more than one way that deviant become criminals. In conclusion, the labelling theory is the most useful for understanding crime and deviance because its shows that the definition of crime is relative and the word can?t be used to describe everyone who commits a deviant act. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Crime & Deviance section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Crime & Deviance essays

  1. Sociological Theories on Crime and Deviance

    People care what others think of them and, therefore, conform to social expectations because they accept what people expect. Social control theory, like the functionalist framework from which it stems, assumes the importance of the socialisation process in producing conformity to social rules. When that bond is broken, deviance occurs.

  2. Assess The Contribution Of Control Theory To Our Understanding Of Crime And Criminality

    It tries to suggest that many theories use these variants to specifically explain the propensity to commit crime. It purports that there will always be variants in the age, gender and race debates and that self control is a constant factor throughout all of them.

  1. Critically compare the three main theories of deviance and assess their strengths & weaknesses

    The individual is labelled as deviant and may be rejected from many social groups. 2. This may encourage further deviance. A drug addict may turn to crime because employers refuse to give him/her a job. 3. Ex-convicts find it difficult to get jobs and may be forced to return to crime.

  2. Assess The Usefulness Of Labelling Theories In Understanding Crime and deviance

    Labelling can be said to be variable with the application of a label varying with diverse factors such as place, gender and age. This helps in our understanding of crime and deviance because the way people react to or see criminal or deviant acts may vary, for example homosexuality can be considered deviant too one person but normal to another.

  1. Compare and evaluate Subcultural theory and labelling theory

    Cloward and Ohlin (1961), argue that Merton and Cohen fail to explain why some subcultures have different norms and values, why do some only have their main concern as theft and others main concerns are violence, they developed the ideology that it depends on what social setting they have grown up in.

  2. Critically assess labelling theories contribution to the sociological understanding of crime and deviance. This ...

    Firstly it has to be questioned about the success of the labelling theories in answering questions such as why a given act is considered deviant and/or criminal in some but not all societies or why a certain kind of reaction may identify behaviour as deviant.

  1. Critically assess the contribution of labelling theory to an understanding of crime and deviance

    Interactionists dispute the functionalist assumption that there was an agreement throughout society as to what behaviour is criminal or deviant. They aimed to find out why certain behaviour was labelled as criminal or deviant in some contexts but not in others.

  2. Compare and Contrast the Main Sociological Theories of Deviance.

    He pointed to the enormous variations between societies in the acts, which have been regarded as criminal in order to reboot the claim that conceptions of crime are rooted in the social evil represented by particular actions. The only attribute applicable to crimes in general is that they are socially proscribed and punished.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work