• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Assess the usefulness of the labelling theory as an approach to the study of crime and deviance

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Assess the usefulness of labelling as an approach to the study of crime and deviance. In sociology's study of crime and deviance, basically all of the theorist, excluding notably the Marxist theory, suggest that there is a difference between those who offend and those who do not, and search for key factors that lead people to offend. However, there are a group of theorist who reject this idea and instead suggest that most people commit deviant and criminal acts, but only some people are caught and stigmatised for it and that stress should be placed upon understanding the reaction to and definition of deviance rather than on the causes of the initial act. Although the labelling theory is quite prominent in the study of crime and deviance, there are as always its endorsers and it criticisers who both give valid accounts to why this theory should be, or not be taken as a valid theory. Firstly, Becker, one of the exponents of the labelling theory, who states that " Deviancy is not a quality of the act a person commits but rather a consequence of the application by others of rules and sanctions to an offender. ...read more.

Middle

Secondly, one of labelling theory's main arguments is that different people respond differently to deviance or law breaking. This is contradictory to most theories which suggest that once a person has committed a criminal or deviant act, then the response will be uniform. Labelling theory suggests the complete opposite and that actually, there is no default reaction to any situation. To show this part of the theory in action, labelling theorists point towards John Kitsuse's study of 75 heterosexual student's responses to presumed sexual advances from the same sex, and found that there was no set reaction which people adhered to. The responses ranged from complete tolerance to blind hatred. This shows how labelling theory presents information that is truly valid in some societies. However, sociologists like Akers criticised the theory as it presents deviant as normal people who are no different to anyone else until someone slaps a label on them. Akers argues that there must be a reason why the label is applied to them. This criticism undermines the labelling theory as Akers raises a good point which would be difficult to ignore for any assessment of the theory. ...read more.

Conclusion

In this example, chronic stuttering, the secondary deviance, is a response to the parents reaction to the initial minor speech defects, the primary deviance. Lastly, labelling theory has been cited as hugely important for the study of crime and deviance due to how other theories have incorporated its idea into their own theory. For example, Taylor, Walton and Young used it when they updated their Marxist criminology. Also, many postmodernist approached owe a lot to the labelling theory, as they incorporated much of the labelling theory into their approach. This shows that the theory must be useful if it is used in many other theories which are also used often in the study of crime and deviance. In conclusion, the labelling theory is a useful theory, but must be used with some degree of suspicion. Although the theories have been backed up by evidence, all societies are different, and the labelling theory was mostly tested on primitive societies, such as the inuits and the pacific islanders. The criticisms all make sense, to show that labelling theory is still far from a very well rounded theory, but it is recognised as beneficial to the study of crime and deviance. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Crime & Deviance section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Crime & Deviance essays

  1. Sociological Theories on Crime and Deviance

    Social control can take place simply through socialisation, but dominant groups can also control the behaviour of others through marking them as deviant. An example is the historic persecution of witches during the Middle Ages in Europe and during the early colonial period in America.

  2. Free essay

    Assess the view that crime and deviance is the result of labelling, the media ...

    The labelling process can be criticised nonetheless. It tends to be deterministic, implying that once someone is labelled, a deviant career is inevitable. This is not always the case with people being able to change a deviant label and change their lives around.

  1. Critically compare the three main theories of deviance and assess their strengths & weaknesses

    There are many examples of illegal behaviour by white-collar criminals and corporations. * Snider (1993) argues that many of the most serious deviant acts in modern societies are corporate crimes. She claims that corporate crime costs more in terms of loss of money and life than crimes such as burglary and robbery.

  2. Assess Marxist theories of crime and deviance.

    Snider argues that white-collar crime is a much more serious crime as it causes more harm than working class crime and costs more in money. An example of this is factories that break health and safety laws that then cause thousands of people to die from pollution.

  1. Compare and Contrast the Main Sociological Theories of Deviance.

    The degree to which an act will be treated as deviant depends also on who commits the act and who feels he has been harmed by it. Rules tend to be applied to some persons more than to others. Studies of juvenile delinquency make the point clearly.

  2. Compare and evaluate Subcultural theory and labelling theory

    The retreatist subculture, this subculture tends to develop amongst failures of legitimate means or as members of either criminal or conflict subcultures, they are perceived as double failures and sometimes form retreatist subcultures based on illegal drug use.

  1. Assess The Usefulness Of Labelling Theories In Understanding Crime and deviance

    When the individual is labelled as deviant they might be rejected from social groups encouraging further deviance. They may find it difficult to get jobs due to their record and return to crime. They may then join an organized deviant group confirming and accepting their deviant identity, this may produce

  2. Examine critically the contribution of labelling theory to our understanding of deviance.

    An important element of the labelling theory as brought to light by Moore (1996) is the exaggeration made by the media involving any sort of deviant or criminal act. The way that the general public perceives any type of criminal or deviant act is heavily influenced by the mass media.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work