• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Assess the usefulness of the labelling theory as an approach to the study of crime and deviance

Extracts from this document...


Assess the usefulness of labelling as an approach to the study of crime and deviance. In sociology's study of crime and deviance, basically all of the theorist, excluding notably the Marxist theory, suggest that there is a difference between those who offend and those who do not, and search for key factors that lead people to offend. However, there are a group of theorist who reject this idea and instead suggest that most people commit deviant and criminal acts, but only some people are caught and stigmatised for it and that stress should be placed upon understanding the reaction to and definition of deviance rather than on the causes of the initial act. Although the labelling theory is quite prominent in the study of crime and deviance, there are as always its endorsers and it criticisers who both give valid accounts to why this theory should be, or not be taken as a valid theory. Firstly, Becker, one of the exponents of the labelling theory, who states that " Deviancy is not a quality of the act a person commits but rather a consequence of the application by others of rules and sanctions to an offender. ...read more.


Secondly, one of labelling theory's main arguments is that different people respond differently to deviance or law breaking. This is contradictory to most theories which suggest that once a person has committed a criminal or deviant act, then the response will be uniform. Labelling theory suggests the complete opposite and that actually, there is no default reaction to any situation. To show this part of the theory in action, labelling theorists point towards John Kitsuse's study of 75 heterosexual student's responses to presumed sexual advances from the same sex, and found that there was no set reaction which people adhered to. The responses ranged from complete tolerance to blind hatred. This shows how labelling theory presents information that is truly valid in some societies. However, sociologists like Akers criticised the theory as it presents deviant as normal people who are no different to anyone else until someone slaps a label on them. Akers argues that there must be a reason why the label is applied to them. This criticism undermines the labelling theory as Akers raises a good point which would be difficult to ignore for any assessment of the theory. ...read more.


In this example, chronic stuttering, the secondary deviance, is a response to the parents reaction to the initial minor speech defects, the primary deviance. Lastly, labelling theory has been cited as hugely important for the study of crime and deviance due to how other theories have incorporated its idea into their own theory. For example, Taylor, Walton and Young used it when they updated their Marxist criminology. Also, many postmodernist approached owe a lot to the labelling theory, as they incorporated much of the labelling theory into their approach. This shows that the theory must be useful if it is used in many other theories which are also used often in the study of crime and deviance. In conclusion, the labelling theory is a useful theory, but must be used with some degree of suspicion. Although the theories have been backed up by evidence, all societies are different, and the labelling theory was mostly tested on primitive societies, such as the inuits and the pacific islanders. The criticisms all make sense, to show that labelling theory is still far from a very well rounded theory, but it is recognised as beneficial to the study of crime and deviance. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Crime & Deviance section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Crime & Deviance essays

  1. Assess The Usefulness Of Labelling Theories In Understanding Crime and deviance

    a deviant subculture, which includes norms and values that support their deviant behaviour. Despite labelling theories strengths in helping our understanding of crime and deviance, it has been criticised in several ways. It has been argued that deviance is not y the social groups who define acts as deviant, as

  2. Critically assess the contribution of labelling theory to an understanding of crime and deviance

    If a child is convinced that he may be a 'stutterer' he could in fact live up to this label. Lemert also carried out a study focusing on labelling and paranoia. The mental condition paranoia is when an individual imagines that they are being 'persecuted by a well-organised conspiracy'.

  1. Sociological Theories on Crime and Deviance

    Social control can take place simply through socialisation, but dominant groups can also control the behaviour of others through marking them as deviant. An example is the historic persecution of witches during the Middle Ages in Europe and during the early colonial period in America.

  2. Outline and Assess Subcultural Theories of Crime and Deviance

    This is not dissimilar to Lyng (1990). He said that young males like taking risks and engaging in what he refers to as 'edgework'; going to the extremities of acceptable behaviour and flirting with danger. Using the example of neo-tribes, Maffesoli (1996)

  1. Compare and Contrast the Main Sociological Theories of Deviance.

    to be booked; and it is extremely unlikely that he will be convicted and sentenced. This variation occurs even though the original infraction of the rule is the same in the two cases. Institutions (prisons, asylums, boarding schools) are particularly important in the stigmatising process.

  2. Assess the usefulness of consensus theories for an understanding of crime and deviance in ...

    Merton's strain theory described the 'American Dream', that if you worked hard to will achieve highly and the goal of money success and the types of people that may not be able to achieve it, such as ethnic minority, the working class, women and people with long term problems (disabilities/mentally).

  1. 2 Examine critically the contribution of labelling theory to our understanding of deviance.

    This survey highlighted that, only in 53 per cent of cases would a decision be made jointly on major spending over one thousand pound. Only one in ten important financial decisions were made by women and the men clearly still hold on to the control of finances.

  2. Assess the usefulness of realist explanations of crime and deviance

    They accused right realism of over-dramatising problems with crime and failing to understand the real causes of crime. They also criticised Marxists and radical criminology of failing to understand working class crime. Unlike right realists, left realists look at the victims of the crime committed.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work