• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Assess the view that working class underachievement in education is down to home circumstances and family background.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

´╗┐Asses the view that the work classes underachievement in education is down to home circumstances and family back ground. Yes arguably, the working classes? underachievement in education is down to home circumstances and family back ground, as mentioned in item A, students underachieve because ?they are disadvantaged by their early experiences?. This is clearly referring to their home circumstances. However the item ignores educational factors which ultimately lead to a working class child?s underachievement. The item refers to how a working class students are not being taught how to speak properly by their parents, which affects how well they do at school. Sociologist Basil Bernstein argued that the underachievement amongst the working class was down to the fact that students from a working class background are primary socialised in a restricted language code. A restricted language code is where the sentence structure of how a person speaks is not very clear, this can be because of the use of colloquialism or just missing out words. Now many teachers talk in an elaborate language code. This can be a problem for those who speak in a restricted language code for numerous reasons. ...read more.

Middle

Sociologist, Herbert Hyman takes the view that the values and beliefs of lower class subculture are a self-imposed barriers to education and career success. the lower class believe that they have less opportunities for individual achievement and place little value on achieving high status jobs so they see no point in education. They are less willing to make sacrifices involved in staying on at school and leave early to take manual work. Marxist, Pierre Bourdieu, argued that the working class were at a disadvantage to the middle class because their parents lacked economic capital. A parent?s economic capital has a huge impact on their child?s educational success. Working class parents will not be able to afford extra tuition, expensive iPad or even a big enough house to provide space to study. Therefore one of the reason working class students underachieve is because of a lack of material resources in the home. David Ball (1980) refers to this as the cost of "free schooling". A study by Emily Tanner et al (2003) found that the cost of items such as transport uniform books computers calculators and sports and music and art equipment place a heavy burden on poor families ...read more.

Conclusion

Gillbourn and Youdell would agree that educational factors are more significant than home factor when it comes to determining a student?s success. They argued that a student?s ability is socially constructed by teachers. Teachers hold certain opinions and judgements about a student?s intelligence based on certain indications such as how students dress, how they speak and how they behave. Furthermore Howard Becker argued that it?s this labelling by teachers that creates the self- fulfilling prophesy, which is where a teacher labels a student is a negative way, for instance the teacher may believe a certain student will never succeed, which that student will eventually pick up on and through that students actions or lack of action, they causes that original label to become true. In conclusion, clearly home factor have a huge influence on whether or not a child with be success whilst in education, however it appears that working class students are put at a natural disadvantage for example J.W.B Douglas found that working class children scored lower at tests of ability than middle class student. He believed this was down to that working class children were less likely to have the support from their parents in their intellectual development through reading to them, etc. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Sociological Differentiation & Stratification section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Sociological Differentiation & Stratification essays

  1. Using material from Item A and elsewhere, assess the view that working-class underachievement in ...

    Murray and Marsland argue that the so called 'underclass' is made up of parents who are afraid of work, are more of ten than not welfare dependant and according to them they are 'inadequate' in terms of transmitting positive values and norms to their children during the process of primary

  2. essay question sociology - education

    It is for this reason, the Middle and the upper class children have cultural capital while lower class children do not.Upper class culture is the dominant culture, and the upper class students perform well because they have cultural capital. The teacher's way of speaking is even Bourgeois- unfamiliar to working class and familiar to lower class.

  1. Is the Underachievement of Ethnic Minority Children due to a Racist School System?

    have to face other problems in the class room that hinder them to explain why Afro-Caribbean children do so much worse than White children of the same socio-economic status. There is a study by Smith and Tomlinson (1989) 'the school effect' that examines the school system itself.

  2. Evaluate sociological explanations for working class underachievement.

    Additionally, Aggleton showed how some middle class students resist schooling and leave with poor qualifications.

  1. Changes in the social structure of education and its impact on class and gender ...

    Within the comprehensive system school diversity developed, with Specialist schools n a particular area, such as science, being allowed to select up to 10% of their intake; beacon schools (lower performing schools) were given increased funding to improve teaching practice.

  2. The functionalistic view of the family

    Obviously one strength is the benefits to society. There are many criticisms to functionalist views of the family. One main group that have criticisms of functionalists are the feminists. They believe that Talcott Parsons (1965) complementary role is very stereotypical and that it is not true in all families.

  1. Outline and assess the impact of the 1988 Education Reform Act

    A study which supports this view is by sociologist Caroline Sharpe; she had interviewed a sample of women before and during the Education Reform Act, (interviews were made during 1976 and 1994). Her studies had shown that women?s priority had altered from the ?love and marriage obsessed? to aspiring women

  2. Assess the view that the working-class underachievement is the result of home circumstances and ...

    cause a child to underachieve at school is the study that was carried out by Sugarman in the 1970s. He found out that the working-class tended to be fatalistic and defeatist and they had a desire for immediate gratification, whilst the middle-class preferred deferred gratification.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work