• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Censorship is necessary to protect the public

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Monday 26th March 2001 "Censorship is necessary to protect the public." How far do you agree with this view? Censorship is the term used to describe the editing of the media to control public access to whole or specific media texts. A view held by some is that the media has a strong influence on people, and in some cases is responsible for the drastic actions of some individuals, for example the murder of toddler James Bulger by two young boys. Generally, proponents of this view believe in the most stringent censorship. At the opposite end of the spectrum, the liberal opinion is that the public have a right to choose themselves whether they personally are exposed to certain media material or not. Effectively, this means no censorship at all. In recent years when prices have descended, multimedia technology has advanced daily and disposable incomes have risen; video recorders and access to the internet are increasingly to be found in the homes of the public. This has led to an increase in availability, through various circumstances, of controversial materials which contain elements such as violence, racism and pornography. With the internet in particular, it is challenging to control who is exposed to it, exactly what people are being exposed to and the serious consequences it may be having. ...read more.

Middle

The watershed is a good idea but has to be implemented by parents; unfortunately, some parents are not responsible enough to do this. Although children mature at varying rates it is obvious that measures such as film classification do not reflect this, for example, some thirteen-year-olds are more mature than some fifteen-year-olds yet will not be able to view films with a fifteen certificate. It does seem bizarre that in the eyes of the law, a child is not judged mature enough to watch a twelve certificate film until the day of their twelfth birthday. However, it seems to be the fairest method. If this system was not in place then parents would have to decide what was suitable viewing for their child; and ignorance or irresponsibility may lead to them making bad decisions, as well as the fact that it is not always practical for a parent to veto videos or films if, for example, their offspring is at a friend's house. Although some children may have access to videos which contain such things as violence and drug taking, at least parents know that because of their age certificate they will be inappropriate. ...read more.

Conclusion

Many people therefore believe that the channel has exploited their practice of self-regulation. It seems that overall, regulation of this type would be effective if employed correctly, but it should be monitored by outside bodies. Consequently, this would not technically be self-regulation. To summarize, it seems that censorship is certainly necessary, somewhere between the two very distant extremes of total censorship and absolute freedom, for the protection of mankind. However, as discussed, practicing censorship is not an easy task because the world is presently comprised of six billion, one hundred and thirty seven million, six hundred and sixty thousand, three hundred and nine* individuals with varying needs, maturity and religious and moral beliefs. Therefore, censorship is not ideal for any one person; so a compromise has to be reached to ensure that it fits in to a certain extent with everyone. Unless the inhabitants of the world all become cloned versions of each other, this will never change. Taking this into account, the present censorship generally seems to be the most accurate and fair it can be under the circumstances; although because censorship covers such a wide range of media, there are some small discrepancies on both sides of the spectrum. * According to the International Programs Center, U.S. Bureau of the Census, projected to 29/3/01 at 17:53:55 GMT. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Media section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Media essays

  1. Censorship is a controversial word. Discuss.

    This is from an essay in Censorship opposing viewpoint, by Michael Scott Cane. The second aspect that censorship is unfair and selfish deals with our rights and the First Amendment. A quote from Nat Hentoff in "The Case of the disappearing books, "says," The First Amendment doesn't just give you

  2. Do we need Censorship in the Media?

    was thought they could handle these films better than the working class. More action and horror films were starting to come out. A violent film called "Battleship Potemkim" was made in 1920 but was only allowed by the BBFC in 1959.

  1. Are we influenced by TV and film? Briefly discuss the evidence and arguments for ...

    Field experiments examine behaviour patterns in natural surroundings. A study carried out by Feshbach and Suger in 1971 looked at the affects of violent television on adolescent boys. A sample of boys aged between 8-18 were given set television programmes to watch over a six week period. They were randomly selected into two groups, with some watching 'aggressive' programmes and the others not.

  2. How does the media represent female bodies?

    This shows that women are represented more in the magazines catering for them. However I decided to explore this further and carry out a tally of how many of these images of women were presented in different ways. Each magazine had a mean of 9.6 pages with images of women catered to beauty.

  1. Conceptions of crime are distorted by exposure to media coverage

    However, there is also a certain degree of bias present in all reporting that stems from the integrated norms and moral background of the journalist involved. It is almost impossible to be completely objective when reporting, and most journalists will slant their stories to appeal to the widest possible audience.

  2. Do the Media have the power to shape public opinion?

    With Germany being over run by fascism and anti-Semitism they concluded that Marx had placed too little emphasis upon the influence of culture in modern capitalist society believing instead that the 'culture industry' would help to indicate the direction that history was taking.

  1. The motive of censorship is to stabilize and control society, over which government has ...

    Moreover, some scholars criticized censorship on the ground that, "Censorship is an evil and suppresses people's opinions by acting as totalitarian government." But, one should not forget the good intention behind this suppression. This suppression is only for benefit of society.

  2. CENSORSHIP - A Liberal and Conservative View

    Therefore the use of vulgar words and obscenities come as a harm to society as a whole. This bring us to another core theme of conservatism, that of the family and organic society. Humans are insecure and need to live in a society where they feel secure and dependant.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work