• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Censorship is necessary to protect the public

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Monday 26th March 2001 "Censorship is necessary to protect the public." How far do you agree with this view? Censorship is the term used to describe the editing of the media to control public access to whole or specific media texts. A view held by some is that the media has a strong influence on people, and in some cases is responsible for the drastic actions of some individuals, for example the murder of toddler James Bulger by two young boys. Generally, proponents of this view believe in the most stringent censorship. At the opposite end of the spectrum, the liberal opinion is that the public have a right to choose themselves whether they personally are exposed to certain media material or not. Effectively, this means no censorship at all. In recent years when prices have descended, multimedia technology has advanced daily and disposable incomes have risen; video recorders and access to the internet are increasingly to be found in the homes of the public. This has led to an increase in availability, through various circumstances, of controversial materials which contain elements such as violence, racism and pornography. With the internet in particular, it is challenging to control who is exposed to it, exactly what people are being exposed to and the serious consequences it may be having. ...read more.

Middle

The watershed is a good idea but has to be implemented by parents; unfortunately, some parents are not responsible enough to do this. Although children mature at varying rates it is obvious that measures such as film classification do not reflect this, for example, some thirteen-year-olds are more mature than some fifteen-year-olds yet will not be able to view films with a fifteen certificate. It does seem bizarre that in the eyes of the law, a child is not judged mature enough to watch a twelve certificate film until the day of their twelfth birthday. However, it seems to be the fairest method. If this system was not in place then parents would have to decide what was suitable viewing for their child; and ignorance or irresponsibility may lead to them making bad decisions, as well as the fact that it is not always practical for a parent to veto videos or films if, for example, their offspring is at a friend's house. Although some children may have access to videos which contain such things as violence and drug taking, at least parents know that because of their age certificate they will be inappropriate. ...read more.

Conclusion

Many people therefore believe that the channel has exploited their practice of self-regulation. It seems that overall, regulation of this type would be effective if employed correctly, but it should be monitored by outside bodies. Consequently, this would not technically be self-regulation. To summarize, it seems that censorship is certainly necessary, somewhere between the two very distant extremes of total censorship and absolute freedom, for the protection of mankind. However, as discussed, practicing censorship is not an easy task because the world is presently comprised of six billion, one hundred and thirty seven million, six hundred and sixty thousand, three hundred and nine* individuals with varying needs, maturity and religious and moral beliefs. Therefore, censorship is not ideal for any one person; so a compromise has to be reached to ensure that it fits in to a certain extent with everyone. Unless the inhabitants of the world all become cloned versions of each other, this will never change. Taking this into account, the present censorship generally seems to be the most accurate and fair it can be under the circumstances; although because censorship covers such a wide range of media, there are some small discrepancies on both sides of the spectrum. * According to the International Programs Center, U.S. Bureau of the Census, projected to 29/3/01 at 17:53:55 GMT. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Media section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Media essays

  1. Do the Media have the power to shape public opinion?

    We become passive beings absorbing unquestioningly whatever the media transmits. The public are unable to escape as every audience, every taste is catered for, there's no digression. Individuals are increasingly dependent on the social processes, which are out of their control.

  2. How does the media represent female bodies?

    the topic of plastic surgery; the highest ranking being More magazine and Company magazine. I think it is important to point out that as well as a mixture of horror stories and real life stories some of these pages contained adverts promoting plastic surgery.

  1. Does Media Violence Lead to Aggression and Societal Violence?

    the result of the survey does support my belief and suggest that media violence may not be the cause of aggression and societal violence. Other factors need to be taken into account when evaluating the effect of media violence. Recent studies of media violence include George Gerbner's Cultivation Study.

  2. Conceptions of crime are distorted by exposure to media coverage

    The editors will also carry out a selection process on the stories before they hit the public view; therefore it is highly unlikely that any crime report reaches the news in an unbiased state.? Journalists also tend to use a set of stereotypes, which serve to easily identify ?types?

  1. The motive of censorship is to stabilize and control society, over which government has ...

    Moreover, some scholars criticized censorship on the ground that, "Censorship is an evil and suppresses people's opinions by acting as totalitarian government." But, one should not forget the good intention behind this suppression. This suppression is only for benefit of society.

  2. CENSORSHIP - A Liberal and Conservative View

    doing what is good for you; this is often refered to as Paternalistic Conservatism. This must not be mistaken however, as it does not take a conservative to implement ideas such as these. On television one can see proof of this with the parental control option, or the bleeping of certain vulgar words.

  1. Censorship is a controversial word. Discuss.

    Another issue that deserves addressing is the lack of censorship in public facilities. Librarians have often complained about the lack of control they have over what the patrons view on the computers in the library. Websites featuring pictures of lewd sexual acts are often left to be displayed on the

  2. Ireland has a long history of censorship but this has been employed for different ...

    An editorial from The Irish Rosary (February 1913) defined the association as a fight 'against papers that fill their columns, issue after issue, with vile, filthy, immoral matter, unfit to be read by our Irish men and women' (Woodman cited Irish Rosary Editorial comment of Feb 1913)

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work