Compare And Contrast Marxist and Functionalist Approaches to the Study of Education

Authors Avatar

Compare And Contrast Marxist and Functionalist Approaches to the Study of Education

Both Marxists and Functionalists see education as serving the needs of society but they differ in whether it is an industrial or capitalist society.  Functionalists see education as serving the needs of an industrial society with an advanced division of labour.  They believe that it is important for the functioning of society that people are slotted into work and social roles that match their abilities.  They see that pupils have their abilities and talents tested in schools so that they can be channelled into roles appropriate to their abilities and training, this is known as role allocation.  Marxists would disagree with this and are interested in the way education works in the interests of the ruling class in a capitalist society.  They see the education system as driven by the needs of capitalism which wants a work force that is easily exploited and accepts their exploitation.

Join now!

Both Marxists and functionalists see education as a powerful influence on students, making sure that they conform to societies norms and values.  Functionalists believe that this will lead to social harmony, stability and social integration.  Marxists believe that this is directly in line with the kind of worker required by employers in a capitalist society.

The French Functionalist Emile Durkeim believes that the school is like a miniature version of society in that schools teach pupils how to work with others in a social context.   The Marxists Samuel Bowles and Herbert Gintis argue that like the work place schools ...

This is a preview of the whole essay