• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Compare And Contrast Marxist and Functionalist Approaches to the Study of Education

Extracts from this document...


Compare And Contrast Marxist and Functionalist Approaches to the Study of Education Both Marxists and Functionalists see education as serving the needs of society but they differ in whether it is an industrial or capitalist society. Functionalists see education as serving the needs of an industrial society with an advanced division of labour. They believe that it is important for the functioning of society that people are slotted into work and social roles that match their abilities. They see that pupils have their abilities and talents tested in schools so that they can be channelled into roles appropriate to their abilities and training, this is known as role allocation. ...read more.


Functionalists believe that this will lead to social harmony, stability and social integration. Marxists believe that this is directly in line with the kind of worker required by employers in a capitalist society. The French Functionalist Emile Durkeim believes that the school is like a miniature version of society in that schools teach pupils how to work with others in a social context. The Marxists Samuel Bowles and Herbert Gintis argue that like the work place schools are based on layers of authority, known as hierarchies. They see teachers as giving orders and the pupils are expected to obey. ...read more.


Bowles and Gintis argue that education does this by broadcasting the myth that it offers everyone an equal chance. Functionalists believe that education provides a means for upward social mobility for those who have the ability. Marxists will completely disagree with this idea and say that with the exception of a few individuals, education confirms an individual's class of origin, as their class of destination. They believe that education contributes to the reproduction of class inequalities between generation, and does not provide a means of upward social mobility for most people. In conclusion Marxists are interested in the way education works in the interests of the ruling class in a capitalist society. Whereas Functionalists are mainly interested in the positive functions education performs for society and in particular, for the economy. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Work & Leisure section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Work & Leisure essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Critically Evaluate the Functionalist Perspective on Education

    5 star(s)

    found that the selection of pupils into one of three bands, according to information from primary schools, was often determined by the career of the parents. This means that the child of a manual worker was likely to be placed in a lower band than the child of a middle-class

  2. Compare and contrast the Marxist and Functionalist views on the role of education in ...

    Education teaches people this at an early age, by giving history lessons because this provides a link between the individual and the society in which they live in. In particular, Durkheim's view are proved by the way pupils are taught in the U.

  1. Examination of the Functionalist view that schools serve the interests of both society and ...

    It showed that the 12 'lads' developed an anti school subculture and were more interested in 'having a laff'. They rejected the values of the school, such as obedience and respect for authority, which is demonstrated in Item B, an extract from Willis research, that gives an example of 'the lads' lying and misleading teachers.

  2. Using material from Item A and elsewhere assess the contribution of functionalist sociology to ...

    The education system efficiently disguises that economic success runs in the family and therefore rejects the Functionalists view between education and stratification. There are many criticism are Bowles and Ginitis, the critics tend to agree that they have exaggerated the correspondence between work and education and not providing sufficient evidence to support their position.

  1. Compare and Contrast functionalist and marxist views on religion

    All of these crises are surrounded with religious ritual, such as death and a funeral. In Malinowski's eyes it, expresses the belief in immortality and comforts the bereaved. Also with the presence of all the family and friends at the funeral support the mourner and help them to control their stress through the expression of solidarity.

  2. Compare and contrast Functionalist and Marxist theories of education

    Schools are simply there to offer all pupils an equal chance of success, reflecting the values of the wider society. He saw the education system as the main agency of secondary education, building on the primary education provided by the family.

  1. Compare and contrast Marxists, Feminist, Functionalists, Third Way and New Right views of the ...

    taxes are forced to stay high in order topay for the benefits due to the high uptake as they are extremely easy to claim. Means tested benefits on the other hand target the poorest in society, with benefits such as tax credits and Job seekers allowance.

  2. Assess Functionalist and Marxist approaches to the relationship between education and economy.

    Hargreaves also noted that schools fail to produce a sense of dignity for working class pupils and therefore fail and may form subcultures, which rejects the values of the school. Hargreave proposed three solutions to the national curriculum. One was for students to follow a field of study where they have a special interest or ability.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work