• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Compare and Contrast the Functionalist and Marxist explanations of the roles of schools in society.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Compare and Contrast the Functionalist and Marxist explanations of the roles of schools in society. Education for all began in 1870 and in 1880; school attendance was made compulsory for all children up to the age of 10. This rose in 1918 to 14, in 1947 to 15 and in 191. 72 to 16. There has been a huge expansion in education this century. There have been many critics of the education system since. Functionalism is what is known as a 'structural theory'. Functionalists see society as being structured like a human body with many interrelated parts that function together to maintain a healthy whole. So as a body has a heart, lung, liver etc society maintenance to the whole social system. Functionalists argue that for a healthy society individuals must obey society's norms and values. We are socialised into these 'Normative behaviours'. Parsons argued that schools act like a bridge between the family and wider society-preparing us for adult roles in society. He said the Family is the primary agent of socialisation-in the family we are judged on particularistic terms because we gain ascribed status from the family. ...read more.

Middle

They argue as long as private education continues to exist society can never be meritocratic, because public schools symbolise class inequality. Parsons argues that schools also perform the function of role allocation. This means that by testing and evaluating students, schools match the students' talents and capacities to jobs they are best suited for. Marxist on the other hand argue that education is an ideological state apparatus which aims to maintain, legitimate and reproduce, generation by generation, class inequalities in wealth and power. The role of education to a Marxist is ideological- it promotes capitalist values as common values. This is done through the hidden curriculum, which refers to the informal ways in which conformity, subordination and acceptance in equality are encouraged in working class young people in the knowledge that is taught in schools and the ways schools are organised. Marxists believe that schools mould children into subjects to fit the requirements capitalism. At school children learn- submission, deference, respect for work and their place within it. In summary, schools work to meet the needs of the workforce. ...read more.

Conclusion

Most work is boring and routine and school functions to prepare working class pupils for their future role as a factory worker. Paul Willis provides a major critique of both perspectives by pointing out that both theories are over-deterministic, i.e. both see pupils as passive products of the educational system. Functionalist see pupils being turned into model citizens whilst Marxist argue that working class kids are turned into conformist workers. Both theories fail take into account the power of pupils to resist these processes. In Willis' study, 'Learning Labour', the 'lads' took little notice of the hidden curriculum- they substituted their own definitions of what school was, based upon 'having a laff'. The 'lads' in his study were very happy to take factory jobs because their working class culture valued factory work. Taking such jobs was seen as success rather than failure. Both Marxist and Functionalist approaches are structuralist theories in that they see social institutions as more important than individuals. Out that both theories are over-deterministic, meaning they fail to take into account the power of pupils to resist these processes. They do not pay mush attention to classroom interaction or how both teachers and pupils interpret what goes on in schools. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Work & Leisure section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Work & Leisure essays

  1. Compare and contrast the Marxist and Functionalist views on the role of education in ...

    is that different people have different norms and values to one another. Hargreaves who is another functionalist proposes a number of changes to the school curriculum in order to create a sense of competence and belonging in pupils. He argues that pupils should have some freedom to pursue fields of study in which they have a special interest or talent.

  2. Compare and contrast Functionalist and Marxist theories of education

    in which education in school contributes to the smooth running of society through teaching shared values and allocating people to appropriate occupational roles.

  1. Compare and contrast Marxists, Feminist, Functionalists, Third Way and New Right views of the ...

    taxes are forced to stay high in order topay for the benefits due to the high uptake as they are extremely easy to claim. Means tested benefits on the other hand target the poorest in society, with benefits such as tax credits and Job seekers allowance.

  2. 'The function of education is to reproduce and legitimate social inequality. Discuss.'

    The bottom streams become more deviant and less inclined to change their stereotype due to the label that the school has given them. Students from the middle and upper classes remain academically successful due souly to their social backgrounds. Parents can afford such educational aids as computers, books, and trips abroad etc, factors which all ensue educational improvement.

  1. Examine sociological explanations of the relationship between education and the economy

    Willis identifies pro-school and anti-school subcultures. The anti school subcultures where nicked named "the lads" ands the pro-school subcultures were called the earoles. Willis was a neo-Marxist who stated that "the lads" developed strategies to cope with the boredom of school and basic routine that they would eventually end up in at work.

  2. Examination of the Functionalist view that schools serve the interests of both society and ...

    In the family we gain ascribed status and are judged on particularistic terms, this means that we are seen as a particular person, i.e. son/daughter, and as such receive specific treatment. When we move into wider society we are judged in terms of our achieved status, that which we have

  1. a) With reference to the Items and elsewhere, assess the view that the introduction ...

    To what extent do you agree that teachers judgements of pupils cause of under-achievement in schools? Refer to the Items and other evidence in you answer (12 Marks) Teachers judgements affect pupils and their achievements or underachievement in the education system.

  2. Using material from Item A and elsewhere assess the contribution of functionalist sociology to ...

    Another criticism is on legitimating inequality and creating the myth that success is based on merit in education. Hickox notes that only 2.5% of English workers saw a link between class and education most thought that family and economic factors were more important.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work