• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Compare and contrast two sociological theories

Extracts from this document...


´╗┐Compare and contrast any two major theoretical perspectives in Sociology Sociology is the study of human social life, groups and societies. Through sociology, we are able to understand the structures and dynamics of our society. In our society, we have institutions, which are basically organisations that exist over time. Although people may change, the structure continues to exist. Examples include the family, education, religion, and economic and political institutions. This is how they function; the educational institutions (public schools, colleges or universities) depend on the government for funding. The government decides how much money they get. Governments are themselves dependent on the economy. The economy itself depends, however, on education, for it is education that supplies the economy with skilled labour. These interrelationships mean that institutions should not be studied in isolation from each other. (Fulcher.J, Scott. J, 2003, Sociology second edition). Then there is the socialisation process. This is the process whereby individuals learn the norms and values of the groups they belong, so that they are ready for social interaction. (www.socialsciencedictionary.com). In other words, it means the process whereby culture is passed from one generation to another. Socialisation starts at birth and ends at death and is very powerful in shaping individuals. It has two processes, primary socialisation which is carried out by the family or first carers and secondary socialisation which is mainly schools, the mass media and religious organisations. (Fulcher.J, Scott.J, 2003, Sociology second edition). Inequality is when there are clear boundaries in society that prevent people from attaining equal status despite their work and effort towards attaining such goals. ...read more.


It is basically need for society to function properly. (Bessant, Judith and Watts, 2002, Sociology Australia). Like Durkheim, Parsons began with the question of how social order is possible. He believed that if people were allowed to pursue their own interests then there would be destruction. Parsons believed that only a commitment to common values provides a basis for order in society (value consensus). However, Marxism is completely different to Functionalism. From a Marxist perspective, in every society the ?mode of production? meaning the way of producing dictates major relationships between owners and workers. Marx argues that in each epoch the economy is the defining feature. The economy therefore provides the infrastructure (the base) from which everything else is formed. This economic infrastructure determines the role and function of the basic institutions in society, what Marx refers to as the ?Superstructure?, e.g. the family, religion, media etc. (Haralambos. M, Holborn. M, 2000, Themes and Perspectives of Sociology). Marx continues to explain how society works from his point of view. He explained how the ?Bourgeoise? (the ruling class) owns everything and how their power stems from their wealth as they own the means of production (property, machinery, factories, treasure etc). ??The potential for class conflict is always present, a ruling class had to continually act to reproduce its domination of the social class.??(www.sociology.org.uk).Marx then went on to develop an idea which he called ?alienation?. By this, he meant the transformation of peoples? own labour into a power which rules them as if by a kind of natural law. ...read more.


Functionalism is accused of having logical flaws and inconsistencies, it often uses a circular argument that can look convincing initially but is in reality illogical. (Haralambos. M, Holborn. M, 2000, Themes and Perspectives of Sociology). Even though theses two theories had weaknesses, they also had strengths. Marxist theory looks at society as a whole, therefore acknowledging all the social forces involved. It recognises the power interests of different groups. It is good at explaining conflict and change in society. Marxism stresses the role of class struggle (conflict) within society between the proletariat (workers) and the bourgeoisie (owners). It also recognises that society is organised under capitalism, in that the bourgeoisie aim to maximise profit by exploiting the proletariat (www.sociology.org.uk). One of the strengths of Functionalism is that it asserts that there are purposes for social conditions or facts. For example, under a functionalist point of view the newspaper deliverer and the sewer worker all contribute to the function of the entire unit, without serving these purposes, the social structure would not function properly. (www.courseworkbank.co.uk). This essay has outlined the many comparisons and contrasts which can be made between the functionalism and Marxism perspectives. It appears that Marxism is very much focused on capitalism and conflict, whereas functionalism views society as working together towards complete consensus. To conclude, I believe that both perspectives explain, and help us to understand, the way in which society functions. However, these are not the only theories. There is also the theory of interaction. This is completely different from the above two because it looks at society as micro and the other two look at society as macro. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Sociological Differentiation & Stratification section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Sociological Differentiation & Stratification essays

  1. Free essay

    Assess the contribution of functionalism to our understanding of society

    3 star(s)

    His definition of science is knowledge, and his definition of sociological knowledge, is explaining the world from the point of view of the subject. Other sociologists such as Becker and Goffman developed this viewpoint, arguing that people's actions and reactions are consequences of interactions with each other.

  2. Peer reviewed

    Produce an essay identifying the different sociological approaches to secularisation with reference to Marxism, ...

    4 star(s)

    This change led to the breakup of small communities and in some places ones which were isolated (could be classed as back in time). Industrialisation was destruction to the norms which dictated to previous behaviour. This resulted in a collapse of social solidarity and collective consciousness.

  1. Can and should sociology be a science?

    He proposed that we should deny neither our values nor the negative impact they can have on research. He urged scientists should be explicit about what their values are. This way, other scientists are forewarned and are better able to spot ways in which research findings may be influenced by personal bias.

  2. Difference and similarities between 2 societies - China and the UK

    8 The inequality of society exist in every countries no matter Britain or China. The salary for different jobs are unequal is an uneven allocation of income across the population. Some people are very wealth while others are very poor.

  1. essay question sociology - education

    It is said all the working class children drop out of school soon. They create the reserve army- that is surplus of workers. This way the bourgeoisie can pay low wages to the workers and the workers fear being fired as there are many that can replace them.

  2. Discuss the similarities and differences between conflict of Marxist theories and functionalist theories in ...

    It was founded by Karl Marx who believed strongly in communism. Marxism is understood as the theory and practice of working class self-emancipation. This theoretical and political tradition is radically different from the way Marxism is generally described by both critics and many 'adherents' who identify Marxism with the repressive

  1. With reference to sociological theories and concepts, assess the view that the main feature ...

    This particular theory assumes that the adequate level of order required in society is missing, focusing this upon the two sexes, male and female. They believe that society which is patriarchal creates clear divisions between the sexes through, ranging from educational opportunities and income within an occupation to the exploitation of women on agencies such as media.

  2. Evaluate a micro and macro sociological perspective in relationship to the study of society. ...

    consensus of the views of the people, and this results in a harmonious society without conflict. Talcott presented the idea that Universities serve four purposes, (1) undergraduate training, (2) research and graduate training, (3) professional schools, and (4) relations between universities and the broader society (Parsons & Platt, 1973)

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work