• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Compare and contrast two sociological theories

Extracts from this document...


´╗┐Compare and contrast any two major theoretical perspectives in Sociology Sociology is the study of human social life, groups and societies. Through sociology, we are able to understand the structures and dynamics of our society. In our society, we have institutions, which are basically organisations that exist over time. Although people may change, the structure continues to exist. Examples include the family, education, religion, and economic and political institutions. This is how they function; the educational institutions (public schools, colleges or universities) depend on the government for funding. The government decides how much money they get. Governments are themselves dependent on the economy. The economy itself depends, however, on education, for it is education that supplies the economy with skilled labour. These interrelationships mean that institutions should not be studied in isolation from each other. (Fulcher.J, Scott. J, 2003, Sociology second edition). Then there is the socialisation process. This is the process whereby individuals learn the norms and values of the groups they belong, so that they are ready for social interaction. (www.socialsciencedictionary.com). In other words, it means the process whereby culture is passed from one generation to another. Socialisation starts at birth and ends at death and is very powerful in shaping individuals. It has two processes, primary socialisation which is carried out by the family or first carers and secondary socialisation which is mainly schools, the mass media and religious organisations. (Fulcher.J, Scott.J, 2003, Sociology second edition). Inequality is when there are clear boundaries in society that prevent people from attaining equal status despite their work and effort towards attaining such goals. ...read more.


It is basically need for society to function properly. (Bessant, Judith and Watts, 2002, Sociology Australia). Like Durkheim, Parsons began with the question of how social order is possible. He believed that if people were allowed to pursue their own interests then there would be destruction. Parsons believed that only a commitment to common values provides a basis for order in society (value consensus). However, Marxism is completely different to Functionalism. From a Marxist perspective, in every society the ?mode of production? meaning the way of producing dictates major relationships between owners and workers. Marx argues that in each epoch the economy is the defining feature. The economy therefore provides the infrastructure (the base) from which everything else is formed. This economic infrastructure determines the role and function of the basic institutions in society, what Marx refers to as the ?Superstructure?, e.g. the family, religion, media etc. (Haralambos. M, Holborn. M, 2000, Themes and Perspectives of Sociology). Marx continues to explain how society works from his point of view. He explained how the ?Bourgeoise? (the ruling class) owns everything and how their power stems from their wealth as they own the means of production (property, machinery, factories, treasure etc). ??The potential for class conflict is always present, a ruling class had to continually act to reproduce its domination of the social class.??(www.sociology.org.uk).Marx then went on to develop an idea which he called ?alienation?. By this, he meant the transformation of peoples? own labour into a power which rules them as if by a kind of natural law. ...read more.


Functionalism is accused of having logical flaws and inconsistencies, it often uses a circular argument that can look convincing initially but is in reality illogical. (Haralambos. M, Holborn. M, 2000, Themes and Perspectives of Sociology). Even though theses two theories had weaknesses, they also had strengths. Marxist theory looks at society as a whole, therefore acknowledging all the social forces involved. It recognises the power interests of different groups. It is good at explaining conflict and change in society. Marxism stresses the role of class struggle (conflict) within society between the proletariat (workers) and the bourgeoisie (owners). It also recognises that society is organised under capitalism, in that the bourgeoisie aim to maximise profit by exploiting the proletariat (www.sociology.org.uk). One of the strengths of Functionalism is that it asserts that there are purposes for social conditions or facts. For example, under a functionalist point of view the newspaper deliverer and the sewer worker all contribute to the function of the entire unit, without serving these purposes, the social structure would not function properly. (www.courseworkbank.co.uk). This essay has outlined the many comparisons and contrasts which can be made between the functionalism and Marxism perspectives. It appears that Marxism is very much focused on capitalism and conflict, whereas functionalism views society as working together towards complete consensus. To conclude, I believe that both perspectives explain, and help us to understand, the way in which society functions. However, these are not the only theories. There is also the theory of interaction. This is completely different from the above two because it looks at society as micro and the other two look at society as macro. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Sociological Differentiation & Stratification section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Sociological Differentiation & Stratification essays

  1. Can and should sociology be a science?

    He proposed that we should deny neither our values nor the negative impact they can have on research. He urged scientists should be explicit about what their values are. This way, other scientists are forewarned and are better able to spot ways in which research findings may be influenced by personal bias.

  2. Evaluation of Functionalism and Marxism

    People have the ability to think for themselves and do as they wish without structural factors or ruling class ideology controlling their behaviour. If that were the case, then our life would more or less already be mapped out for us the moment we are born, and anything that happens would be because society says it should.

  1. Sociological Perspectives - there are three major categories in which people might go about ...

    And although that explains a large part, and is part of our society today, it doesn't address the smaller and more subtle issues. Unlike the two perspectives above, symbolic interactionists focus the sociological view on the micro level, and on face-to-face interactions between people (Ferris 50).

  2. essay question sociology - education

    It is said all the working class children drop out of school soon. They create the reserve army- that is surplus of workers. This way the bourgeoisie can pay low wages to the workers and the workers fear being fired as there are many that can replace them.

  1. Outline and Assess the Usefulness of Conflict Theories in Explaining Social Class Inequalities in ...

    Neo-Weberian Theory refers only to the groups within society and the way in which they can exclude others. This can be applied to many different groups within society and evidence of usurpation strategy can be found in various laws that have passed over the years such as the Disability Discrimination Act and the Sex Discrimination Act.

  2. Discuss the similarities and differences between conflict of Marxist theories and functionalist theories in ...

    It was founded by Karl Marx who believed strongly in communism. Marxism is understood as the theory and practice of working class self-emancipation. This theoretical and political tradition is radically different from the way Marxism is generally described by both critics and many 'adherents' who identify Marxism with the repressive

  1. Critically compare cultural and structural theories of the social patterning of health and illness.

    Research conducted by Alice Sullivan Bull et al (1994). With houses they made it private or option to buy a council property that you never own. A trap situation, individuals will always contribute to society economics system. Marxist perspective main approach is through Capitalism employment and lifestyle experiences such as

  2. Evaluate a micro and macro sociological perspective in relationship to the study of society. ...

    consensus of the views of the people, and this results in a harmonious society without conflict. Talcott presented the idea that Universities serve four purposes, (1) undergraduate training, (2) research and graduate training, (3) professional schools, and (4) relations between universities and the broader society (Parsons & Platt, 1973)

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work