• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Crime and Deviance: Assess sociological explanations of ethnic differences in the patterns of crime and deviance.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Crime and Deviance: Assess sociological explanations of ethnic differences in the patterns of crime and deviance. Statistics show that there is a profound difference in crime rates between black people and white people, they are over represented in prisons and they fear crime more than white people. Sociologists have many explanations for these findings some suggesting that they are accurate and try to explain why, others that assume they are inaccurate and try to explain how. The traditional approaches such as Shaw and McKay in 1931 believed that the statistics were correct and tried to explain why. They linked racial minorities and crime simply because they were more likely to live in areas that were socially disorganised. Messner also looks along the lines of location and believes that black people live in areas of social deprivation and that this frustrates them so they turn to crime as a way of getting out of the deprivation. ...read more.

Middle

In 40% of cases the victim cannot describe the race of a non-white, they cannot identify between Indian, African or Chinese offenders. They believe that ethnic minority criminals are more likely to be less favourably treated in courts by the judge and jury, also they are more likely to get longer sentences and are six times more likely to end up in prison. Smith in '97 disagrees with this view and says that the proportion of black people at the beginning of the legal system is the same as at the end. Another approach is the combined approach, as it suggests it uses a combination of approaches to try to explain ethnic differences in patterns of crime. It combines critical criminology and sub-cultures with the ideas of economic marginalisation, they say that the capitalist system has failed the ethnic minorities and that this marginalisation is made to be ideological as well as it is a capitalist strategy to produce subservient cheap reserve labour. ...read more.

Conclusion

He also suggests that many beliefs about black criminality are myths created by the capitalist society and extreme police bias. Gilroy's views have attracted strong criticism from John Lea and Jock Young, especially the police bias theory, as 92% of crimes known to police are brought to their attention by members of the public. Post modernists criticise many of the modernist theories in that they say modernist theories emphasise the sameness of criminals where as differences should be emphasised. They reject an all-embracing truth. Also they say that modernists use their own discourse, which prevents ethnic minorities from being understood. Many of these theories don't explain why only a small number of black people turn to crime or why it is mainly young males who commit crime nor do they examine differences in class, therefore in conclusion many are lacking in explanations and so cannot fully explain the differences in crime statistics between black and white people. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Crime & Deviance section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Crime & Deviance essays

  1. Sociological Theories on Crime and Deviance

    * Altruistic suicide occurs when there is excessive regulation of individuals by social forces. An example is someone who commits suicide for the sake of a religious or political cause, such as suicide bombers (e.g The 11th September attack of the World Trade Centre)

  2. Free essay

    Assess the view that crime and deviance is the result of labelling, the media ...

    So Miller has got similar views to why people deviate in society that Cohen saying that it is the individual that chooses to deviate or not. The labelling theory unlike Millers theory fails to analyse the source of this power to deviate.

  1. Assess sociological explanations of social class differences in crime rates

    Marxists argue that the ruling class (bourgeoisie) commit all the corporate crime they want without punishment, but the overall less damaging crime of the proletariat is harshly punished. From a left realist perspective, the cultural issues of relative deprivation and individualism have, according to Jock Young ' caused the working

  2. Sociological explanations for patterns in ethnicity and crime

    Bowling and Philips argue that victims are influenced by (racial) stereotypes are culturally determined expectations as to who commits crime. Certainly, research by Bowling's (1999) indicates that where offenders is not known, white people are more likely to ascribe the crime to those of African Caribbean origin study.

  1. Assess the usefulness of realist explanations of crime and deviance

    In terms of the social order and crime prevention view, crime reduction means raising the benefits of conformity and increasing the costs of crime. This argument goes hand in hand with Wilson and Hernstines argument that crime rates will change if there are changes in the costs and benefits of committing crime.

  2. Evaluate subcultural explanations for crime and deviance

    They maintain that most (although not all) laws are largely created by the state to protect the interests of the powerful ruling class.

  1. Compare and Contrast the Main Sociological Theories of Deviance.

    Punishment strengthens social solidarity through the reaffirmation of moral commitment among the conforming population who witness the suffering of the offender. Durkheim also argues that the elimination of crime is impossible; this is because there are, and always will be, differences between people.

  2. Crime and deviance in Trinidad and Tobago

    They maintain that the three subcultures may arise as a result of either complete or limited access to legitimate and illegitimate opportunity structures which are conflict, criminal and retreatist subcultures with relation to gang delinquency. They also suggest that the illegitimate opportunity structure is mainly achieved and sought after by

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work