• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Criminal justice policy.

Extracts from this document...


CRIMINAL JUSTICE POLICY CASE STUDY. SHAMMA SISPAL MANCHESTER METROPOLITAN UNIVERSITY BA (HONS) CRIMINOLOGY & CONTEMPORARY CULTURE 2003/2004 YEAR 2 BIBLIOGRAPHY. * Crawford, A (1999). The Local Governance of Crime. Oxford University Press, England. * Crawford, A (1998). Crime Prevention and Community Safety. Longman Ltd, UK. * Graef, R (2001). Why Restorative Justice? Calouste Gulbenkian Foundation. London * Joyce, P (2001). Crime and the Criminal Justice System. Liverpool University Press. * Leishman, F (2000). Core Issues in Policing second edition. Dorset Press, Pearson Education Ltd. * Leng, R and Birch, D (2000). Youth Justice and Criminal Evidence Act 1999. Blackstone Press Ltd, London. * Leng, R (1998) Blackstones Guide to the Crime and Disorder Act 1998. Blackstone Press Ltd. London * McEvoy (2002). The Introduction of Referral Orders into the Youth Justice System: second interim report. No. 23. London Home Office. * Miller, L (2001). The Politics of Community Crime Prevention. Ashgate Publishing Company, England. * Moxon, D (2001). An Explanatory Evaluation of Restorative Justice Schemes. Home Office. London. * Pitts, J (1999). Working with Young Offenders second edition. Macmillan Press Ltd, London. * Worrall, A (1997). Punishment in the Community. Longman Ltd, UK. * Wright, M (1996). Justice for Victims and Offenders- A Restorative Response to Crime. Waterside Press. Manchester. Websites * Crimereduction.gov.uk/crssummary_1.htm * Crimereduction.gov.uk/youth22.htm To what extent is restorative justice likely to benefit offenders and the victim referred to in the case study? ...read more.


The partnerships work to reduce crime and disorder in an area by establishing the levels of crime problems in that neighbourhood and consulting widely with the population of that area to make sure that the partnership's perception corresponds to that of local people. After surveying the local patterns and levels of crime, the next stage is to decide what they will do to eliminate the problems identified and prevent the crimes from reoccurring, in this case causing emotional and bodily harm to Mrs Mathers through physical attack. The aim is to advance the physical security of vulnerable targets through the introduction of techniques like surveillance (CCTV's), Neighbourhood Watch Schemes, increasing the number of street lights, injecting more money to recruit more police officers, and to pay for the expansion of the DNA database and invest in a new national communications system. These act as deterrents for youths who will think twice before committing crime and at the same time reducing peoples' fear of crime, all resulting in building a safer, more cohesive society. Much excellent partnership work has been done in many parts of the country for several years, but has so far been random. The partnerships provisions ensure that all communities will benefit from improvement which effective partnerships will have brought. Evaluate the potential effectiveness of using a Curfew Notice to prevent a recurrence of the crime suffered by Mrs Mathers. ...read more.


supports McEvoy's findings and confirms that 91% of all local panel members are white, when the majority of young offenders are of Afro-Caribbean origin. The figures continue, 69% of panel members are female, when 66% of the young offenders are male, over 50% of panel members were aged 40 years or more and employed in professional/managerial occupations, when unsurprisingly, the mass of young offenders are unemployed. This indicates that the members of the panel are vastly unrepresentative of the rest of the community. It appears that the concept of Youth Offender Panels is a contradiction in its own right, as it is not doing justice to the offenders in the way it should. A briefing paper by Ann McDermott, Crime Concern, states that the support and involvement of local residents is fundamental to the effective performance of YOPs. A strength of Youth Offender Panels is that they successfully reduce crime rates where juvenile delinquency is prominent. The young offenders become aware of the effects their behaviour has had on the community and endeavour to make improvements for everybody's welfare. Peter Joyce (2001) establishes, "young offenders would learn a valuable moral lesson through the YOP process", meaning it enables the offender to earn their acceptance back into the community and solve the damage and distress caused. This increases communities' self-confidence, in turn improving community cohesion and reducing the social exclusion of juveniles. Accordingly, the likelihood of reformed offenders committing crime again has decreased, after being accepted back into the community. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Crime & Deviance section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Crime & Deviance essays

  1. The Justice and welfare debate.

    They advocate a return to a justice system that believed in 'equality before the law' a tariff of punishments for certain offences regardless of any welfare considerations. Although this system in many ways would be quite harsh it would however call for 'certain minor offences such as drink, drugs heterosexual or homosexual sex under age be decriminalised' (Muncie J, 2001:270).

  2. Is CCTV effective in tackling crime?

    Research shows that CCTV does little to limit spontaneous crimes involving drug and alcohol-affected people. Consequently video surveillance systems have been found to be less effective in the following areas: 1. Robbery and theft from the person; 2. Wounding and assault of the person; 3. Crimes involving drugs; and 4.

  1. Describe and Evaluate the Use of Victim Surveys as a Measurement of Criminal Activity

    Violence that female victims experience: Domestic violence - assaulted at home by partner/ex partner Leisure-related - occurs where victim spends leisure time i.e. the local pub Occupational hazard - at work i.e. nurses assaulted by patients Friend/neighbour disagreements Provocation - provokes own fight, responsible for violence herself Defended/chased - self-defence

  2. Crime is rapidly increasing in this day and age, however, thanks to the increasing ...

    It will need to be photographed as the print will dissapear after a short time. The last method of revealing fingerprints is superglue fuming, the superglue vapour reacts with the water in a print, the object with the print will have to be placed in a sealed tank to do

  1. Tacking crimes involving in juvenile

    criminal conviction and may believe he or she is isolated and lost, resulting in return to crime. In totalling, it is wrong to label a person so early in life, for an action that may have been hasty or motivated by rake force.

  2. To make obvious to you all what a youth curfew is, our team has ...

    Also, according to the FBI's UCR report, youth perpetrators often take crime upon people of their age so it is expected that crime rates of victimization will reduce. Through reference from the Office of Crime Statistics and Research in Adelaide, it has been displayed that a high number of teenagers participate in youth crime.

  1. The following essay will explore the question; What is the relationship between policing governance ...

    It also provides accountability to local areas through the local police authorities. The tripartite system is based on the separation of power, except there have been durable disputes regarding the balance of power between the three partners[14]. The government has shifted the balance of power towards the centre,?

  2. In what way can the state be accused of taking part in criminal activity?

    The officers claimed that they shouted ?armed police?. However, the jurors sided with the recollections of the passengers who said they did not shout ?armed police? and Mr. De Menezes did not approach them ?aggressively?, as the police claimed. The evidence of the witnesses and the police conflicted and also

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work