• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Critically assess labelling theories contribution to the sociological understanding of crime and deviance. This question includes assessment of connections between crime and deviance and social theory.

Extracts from this document...


Critically assess labelling theories contribution to the sociological understanding of crime and deviance. (40) This question includes assessment of connections between crime and deviance and social theory. Becker is the main sociologist studying labelling theory on deviance, he argues that 'social groups create deviance by making the rules whose infraction constitutes deviance.' Meaning acts only become deviant when observers perceive it and define it as deviant. An example of this would be the act of nudity, it is accepted in the bedroom between husband and wife or on a nudist camp, but when a stranger was to enter the bedroom, or someone was to streak across a sporting event, others would usually see this as deviant, and this deviancy would become a label on the individual. Several factors affect what the audience would perceive as deviant, such things as, who commits the act; when and where it is committed; who observes the act; and negotiations between those in the act. It is often those who respond to the acts who label the act deviant rather than the behaviour of the individual. To stress this, Becker uses the example of a brawl between youngsters, in a working-class area police would see the act as sign of delinquency whereas if it was to occur in a wealthy neighbourhood it would just be classed as youthful high spirits. ...read more.


* Moral panics, Stan Cohen studying youth subcultures, specifically 'mods' and 'rockers' looked at how the media concentrated on building these groups up into trouble makers due to lack of stories, because of this attention people started to decide if they were mods or rockers and accentuated the violence that took place between them. This case of moral panic can also be seen in Hall's study of mugging. Labelling theorists studying mental illness claim that mental illness is a label applied to certain people in certain circumstances as well as suggesting that the concept of mental illness is socially constructed. Thomas Scheff - a leading writer on mental illness, argues that there is no such thing as mental illness, instead all behaviour that doesn't make sense to us we just throw into a 'dustbin category' where behaviour cant be explained through drug or alcohol use. Also he suggests people can justify odd behaviour through just passing it off as common phrases such as 'they're just a bit depressed' or 'they've got a lot on their mind at the moment.' However labelling theorists have had their work criticised on many levels, and these criticisms must be examined before any evaluation of the contribution of the labelling theorists to the sociology of deviance can be made. ...read more.


In many cases of deviance then this secrecy will create problems. It is also very difficult for the researcher to observe the deviant individuals in their everyday lives perhaps in dangerous areas of society, as the problems of gaining the trust of what may be in some cases, violent or dangerous people. It may also be difficult for the researcher to observe impartially, or to continue to observe without being drawn in to either commit the crimes themselves or to try to prevent the crimes being committed. Becker also outlines moral problems He questions where the researchers sympathies should lie, should they side with the 'underdog' or should they judge criminal behaviour as wrong? To evaluate the contribution of the labelling theorists to the study of the sociology of deviance, it can be said that it depends on how the theory is viewed. If the theory is seen as ' a theory with all the achievements and obligations that go with the title' then it has many flaws. But if, as Becker suggests, we attempt to consider the theory as just a way of looking at deviance, then the contribution can be great, as it opened up a study of the individual after he has committed an act of deviance. It can be concluded that labelling theory continues its usefulness, as long as deviant behaviour continues to exist. Laura Edwards ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Crime & Deviance section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Crime & Deviance essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Assess the Usefulness of Official Crime Statistics to a Sociological Understanding of Crime

    4 star(s)

    protect the interests of the ruling class and that a crimes by the poor are strictly adhered to but crimes by the more affluent of our society are ignored. This can be reflected in the under reporting of what is known as white-collar crime.

  2. Sociological Theories on Crime and Deviance

    Durkheim argued that suicide rates are affected by the different social contexts in which they emerge. He looked at the degree to which people feel integrated into the structure of society and their social surroundings as social factors producing suicide.

  1. Evaluate Functionalist Theories of Crime and Deviance

    and Gesellschaft or social relationships in a large-scale, urban environment, built on Durkheim's claim that larger societies with weaker informal social bonds tended to have higher rates of delinquency and crime. Park, in "Human Ecology", noting the disruptive effects of immigration on communities, argues that groups "struggling for space" within

  2. Free essay

    Assess the view that crime and deviance is the result of labelling, the media ...

    So they believe that people commit crime is because society is structured in a way which forces them to do so. Interactionists in the other hand focus on the interaction between people and society. They tend to use a micro approach to society by intending to understanding a person's behaviour

  1. Crime: Social construction or reality?

    The first element is 'the wider origins of the deviant act'. The origins of the deviant act in a capitalist society would be compared against those in an industrialised society, to try to locate the social causes of crime. The 'immediate origins of the deviant act', means that the social

  2. An Evaluation on the Biological Theories of Crime

    Sheldon carried out an experiment where he took full-length photographs of 200 male college students and 200 male delinquents and rated each individual on three different scales of 1-7,each scale representing the body types. ENDOMORPH 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 ECTOMORPH 1 2 3 4 5 6 7

  1. Critically evaluate the contribution that the Labelling theory has made to our understanding of ...

    This is likely to reinforce a deviant lifestyle, leading to a development of further deviant acts and even to a deviant career. This could ultimately lead to the creation of deviant sub-cultures. However, there have been many fundamental criticism of Howard Becker's theory.

  2. Crime and deviance in Trinidad and Tobago

    They maintain that the three subcultures may arise as a result of either complete or limited access to legitimate and illegitimate opportunity structures which are conflict, criminal and retreatist subcultures with relation to gang delinquency. They also suggest that the illegitimate opportunity structure is mainly achieved and sought after by

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work