• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Critically Assess Observation Methods.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Critically Assess Observation Methods The term Observation Method describes a research method involving the observation of persons to derive and obtain data of a qualitative nature for sociological purposes. There are a variety of different and varying observation methods, each with its distinct disadvantages and advantages. This can be measured on two scales- the Overt/Covert scale which gauges the extent to which research subjects are aware of the observation and the Participant/Non-Participant scale which measures the degree to which the researcher is involved with the research subjects. Positivists, who view sociology as measurable through scientific methods, would not be in favor of observation methods as they see qualitative data as vague and from a narrow sample. On the other hand, interpretivists would be in favor of observation methods, as they view each individual within society as unique, therefore making qualitative data of greater utility. One clear advantage of observation methods would be the fact that it produces vast amounts of detailed qualitative data. Interpretivists would see this as advantageous as they assume every person is a unique social entity. ...read more.

Middle

Research methods could also cost significantly less that conducting mail or phone surveys, or sending out a team of interviewers, hence making the method more practical. Observation methods would also have greater environmental validity as they take place in the natural environment of the issue being studied. On the other hand, Observation Methods also have some striking disadvantages. Overt, participant observation brings about serious problems with the validity of the research. The presence of the researcher, as well as the fact that the research subjects are aware of the research, may lead to results and data being distorted by the Hawthorne Effect, in which research subjects will change their behavior while being watched. This would lead to a reduction in the validity of the research in question as the behavior recorded by the researcher is not an accurate reflection of the group being studied. Self-presentation is also an issue when the observation method is used, as those being observed may try to give a different perception of themselves to the researcher. Observation methods are also plagued by the imposition dilemma- mainly because the researcher must decide what is to be researched and what to record. ...read more.

Conclusion

Observation methods also suffer from significant ethical problems. Covert observation, in which the research subject is unaware of the research, may result in the breech of privacy laws. Observation of groups such as criminal gangs may also result in the researcher being complicit in illegal acts, or failing to report them when they do happen. The deceitful manner in which some observation studies are carried out- in which the actual matter being researched is not revealed- also adds an element of dishonesty and yet another ethical problem. Therefore, it can be said that there are both advantages and disadvantages to the use of observation methods in sociological research. The overall decision on whether this method is of use will depends squarely on the perspective and view taken by the sociologist conducting the research. Positivists would deride observation as narrow and difficult to quantify, while interpretivists would actively advocate the use of observation in order to derive high quality, detailed qualitative data. In conclusion, research methods are of use, but clearly with regards to the gathering of qualitative data, in which it holds a significant advantage over other methods. ?? ?? ?? ?? Edwin Loo 12K 18/02/2007 Sociology Essay Page 1 of 2 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Sociological Differentiation & Stratification section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Sociological Differentiation & Stratification essays

  1. Participant Observation

    Similarly, Patrick 1973 had to keep his name secret as he feared for his personal safety when studying violent Glasgow gangs, as did William Chambliss [1978] whilst studying organised crime in Seattle. The element of choice is a useful part of participant observation in sociological research, as researchers can choose

  2. Assess the usefulness of participant observation as a research method for sociologists.

    of the people in the group. This can often lead to completely new insights and generate new theoretical ideas which are also good for validity. One of the problems with questionnaires, and to a lesser extent with interviews, is that the respondent can lie.

  1. Discuss the usefulness of Quantative and Qualitative Methods in study of Suicide.

    contested found to be unreliable, which could lead to Durkheim's suicide study being invalid. Statistics are an essential quantative method which can be used for many topics. They are essentially quantative in that they are pieces of raw data that give a positivist the opportunity to make a lot of

  2. Assess the usefulness of Postal Questionnaires

    tend to be more-limited than with almost any other method of research. This makes it difficult for a researcher to gather information that is rich in depth and detail. With a postal questionnaire, the researcher can never be certain the person to whom the questionnaire is sent actually fills it in.

  1. Qualitative and Quantitative methods of gathering data an overview.

    but they pre-judge the subject matter therefore do not give a valid picture of reality. Oakleys criticism of willmott and young is that their data is not valid because they use the wrong methology i.e to find out the truth about domestic labour and equality researchers need to use unstructured

  2. Participant observation studies have little value in sociological research because they are too subjective. ...

    Simply said, researcher put themself in a dangerous situation. This is unpractical for a researcher. Positivist also questioning the validity of an overt participant observation?s results due to Hawthorne effect. For instance, a National Research Council initiated a set of experiments at Western Electric?s Hawthorne Plant in Cicero, Illinois in 1924, to study whether better lighting enhances workers? productivity.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work