Page
  1. 1
    1
  2. 2
    2
  3. 3
    3

Critically assess the contribution of labelling theory to an understanding of crime and deviance

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Critically assess the contribution of labelling theory to an understanding of crime and deviance Labelling theory is one theory suggested by sociologists as the explanation for crime and deviance. However, several different theories were in existence before the labelling theory came about. First of all there were the biological theories; these stated that the cause of a person acting in a deviant manner was due to a physiological characteristic or quality which they possessed. For example having a mesomorphic body type or having XYY chromosomes were believed to be causes of someone becoming a criminal. Biological theories however are widely criticised as they do not take into account several patterns in the distribution within society of crime and deviance, which statistics show are apparent. For example there is an obvious pattern between social status and criminal convictions; there are many more convictions in the working class communities. However, physiological characteristics are randomly distributed meaning that as many upper class individuals should commit crimes as the lower classes, the biological theories give no explanation to why this is the case. Another point for criticism is the difference in amount of convictions of the old and young, when in reality there are far more younger people commit crimes. If it was a biological factor causing someone to commit crimes this characteristic would remain with them the whole of their lives and therefore as many people would still be committing crimes when they were old as when they were young. ...read more.

Middle

The act is only made deviant in a situation when society views it as inappropriate; the act itself is not illegal. Edwin M. Lemert emphasises, like Becker, the significance of society and its reaction to deviant behaviour. He believes that there are two separate types of deviance, Primary and Secondary. Primary deviation consists of deviant acts being carried out before the individual is publicly labelled as a delinquent. Secondary deviation is when a person commits a deviant act as a response to society's reaction to and labelling of them. He believes that society's reaction can be named as the major cause of deviance, claiming that agents of social control are to blame for deviance rather than the deviant. Emphasising this point of secondary deviation is Lemert's study 'Stuttering among the North Pacific Coastal Indians'. The North Pacific coastal Indians live a ceremonial life of singing, dancing and speechmaking. Right from a young age children are involved in the ceremonies and their parents stress the importance of a flawless performance. There is a particularly high sensitivity to any speech defect, and if one becomes apparent during their speech shame is brought upon the child and their parents. Stuttering is not very common amongst North American Indians many tribes don't even have a word for it in their language though it does sometimes occur. Lemert believes however that stuttering is in fact caused by societal reaction, by this he means that the child and parents anxiety over a possible speech impediment actually causes them. ...read more.

Conclusion

This therefore maintains those at the bottom of the social structure at the bottom purely due to the stereotypical view the police possess of them. The labelling theory however does have its faults. In many cases no explanation is given for the actual deviant act which occurs. For example in the case of Lemert, he states that there is 'Primary deviation' which he states is not caused by society giving the delinquent a label but he doesn't go on to say what the actual reason for the deviancy is. He simply says "There are probably any number of causes of primary deviation and it is largely a fruitless exercise to inquire into them". He doesn't bother trying to explain the cause of this deviance he just says there is no point in doing so. Cicourel also lacks some explanation in a certain aspect of his theory. He states that the police arrest people on the basis of their view of the typical delinquent, however, he does not explain where they acquired this view of the stereotype of a criminal. They must have some reasoning behind this image but no thought is given to where it stemmed from. Also the labelling theory only deals with minor crimes and deviant acts such as stuttering and paranoia. It doe not even attempt to explain major crimes such as murder and robbery etc. it seems to choose to ignore these crimes completely, when these are probably the more important ones to make sense of. Lorna Suckling ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Crime & Deviance section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Crime & Deviance essays

  1. Examine critically the contribution of labelling theory to our understanding of deviance.

    He studied juvenile delinquency in two American cities, in his study he found that juvenile crime rates were consistently higher in working class areas compared to middle class areas. He argued that this was down to the way that police dealt with working class juveniles compared to the middle class, even when they engaged in the same actions.

  2. Sociological Theories on Crime and Deviance

    Who determines social norms and on whom such judgements are most likely to be imposed are questions seldom asked by anyone using a functionalist perspective. Functionalists see deviance as having stabilising repercussions in society, but they tend to overlook the injustices that labelling someone deviant can produce.

  1. Assess the usefulness of the labelling theory as an approach to the study of ...

    However, the theorists suggest that once labelled as a deviant, various consequences occur for the individual. Lemert, an influencial labelling theorists distinguished between primary deviance, the actual rule breaking, and secondary deviance, which is the consequence of the responses of others.

  2. Critically assess labelling theories contribution to the sociological understanding of crime and deviance. This ...

    Which in turn could turn into a self-fulfilling prophecy because of being identified with the label and it becomes controlling. Once these steps have occurred, what Becker describes as 'the deviant career' is completed when the individual joins an organised deviant group and thus accepting their identity of being deviant.

  1. The Sociology of Crime and Deviance

    Children also face pressure from peers and the media also has a part to play in social control. The above mentioned, excluding the state, is informal control. Formal Control would be the government, police, and criminal courts for example. It could be argued that society is being controlled from every angle.

  2. Evaluate Functionalist Theories of Crime and Deviance

    from a feminist perspective, namely due to the glaring fact that it does not adequately explain how females coped with the idea of 'status deprivation'- an accusation further reinforced by the fact that Cohen's work was titled "Delinquent Boys".

  1. Free essay

    Assess the view that crime and deviance is the result of labelling, the media ...

    Interactionists are different to structuralists in different ways. Structuralists such as Functionalists, Marxists and subcultural theories all believe that it is the structures of society that influence peoples behaviour. This is called a macro approach which is where institutions in society such as education, politics and religion affect society and the way that people live their lives.

  2. anti-social behaviour

    3.8 The disadvantages of using questionnaires are that they limit and shape the nature of the answers that are obtainable, consequently the data then is not able to be generalized to the wider population, and this is also due to the small sample used.

  • Over 180,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work

Marked by a teacher

This essay has been marked by one of our great teachers. You can read the full teachers notes when you download the essay.

Peer reviewed

This essay has been reviewed by one of our specialist student essay reviewing squad. Read the full review on the essay page.

Peer reviewed

This essay has been reviewed by one of our specialist student essay reviewing squad. Read the full review under the essay preview on this page.