• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Critically assess the view that social stratification benefits the powerful groups in society

Extracts from this document...


Social stratification may be defined as the hierarchical arrangement of social classes, castes and strata within a society (Wikipedia, 2006). Social stratification is regarded quite differently by the functionalist and Marxist perspectives of sociology. This paper will critically review both these perspectives on social stratification with reference to contemporary empirical evidence. A synopsis of both Marxist theory and the functionalist approach to social stratification will be provided while the remainder of the paper will compare and contrast both perspectives and introduce key research on the social divisions in society. Finally, for the purposes of this paper, social stratification may be considered primarily as an economic concept. Space does not permit consideration of other important social divisions based on gender, racial identity, disability, age, or ethic identity. From a Marxist perspective, in all stratified societies there are two major social groups: a ruling class (Bourgeoisie) and a subject class (Proletariat). Marx argued that the ruling class gained its power from the ownership and control of the 'means of production' i.e. land, capital, labour power, buildings and machinery, in which the subject, or 'working' class owned only their labour which they sold to the Bourgeoisie in return for wages (Livesy, 2006). ...read more.


Conflict therefore arises as it is in the interests of capitalists to exploit the workforce to ensure higher profit margins. From a Marxist perspective, systems of stratification derive from the relationships between these two social groups in respect to the means of production (Haralambos & Holborn, 1995). Therefore, in a capitalist society this relationship can lead to inequality, poverty and an unequal distribution of power, income, wealth, and rewards such as salary. However, some groups are much more likely to end up in poverty than others (Haralambos & Holborn, 1995). For example, the working class, and in particular those within that class who are unskilled, are more likely to become unemployed due to changes in the economy; particularly within the manufacturing industry where there has been a reduction in the number of unskilled jobs available (Haralambos and Holborn, 1995). These groups are also at risk of becoming long term unemployed which can lead to poor living standards (Haralambos & Holborn, 1995). Also, living standards of the long term unemployed have been undermined by changes in government policy, when in 1982 the unemployed lost the right to earnings related supplements which was superseded by unemployment benefit, which in itself was restricted to the first twelve months after becoming unemployed. ...read more.


Poverty provides employment for fast growing sections of society, whereby jobs are created for those professions who deal with the poor such as the police, probation officers, social workers, and administration staff who oversee the poverty industry (Haralambos & Holborn 1995). In 1976 Britain's health and social care sector employed almost 80,000 staff to deal with the poor (Haralambos & Holborn 1995). In conclusion functionalists would argue that social stratification benefits everyone, even the poorest members of society, as this group would strive to get out of poverty and if this was to be achieved they would then be motivated further to maintain this status. Nevertheless, Marxists believe that social stratification benefits only the powerful groups in society. The widening gap between the rich and the poor within Britain provides support to the Marxist argument. Income inequality rose in 2001/2 to reach its highest ever level and in 2004/5 almost two thirds of the population had incomes below the national average equivalised income of �427 per week, suggesting that only a small number of people (the powerful group), are on relatively high incomes (Brewer et al 2006). It would seem that from these statistics, and the analysis provided in this paper, that indeed social stratification does benefit the powerful groups in society. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Sociological Differentiation & Stratification section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Sociological Differentiation & Stratification essays

  1. Outline and Assess Whether stratification is either inevitable or beneficial to individuals and society?

    matter how clever you are they are reluctant to take you unless you are upper class. Marshall and Gordon go on to criticize functionalists for ignoring social problems such as poverty which results form the stratification system. Another criticism of functionalism is that Davis and Moore assume there is a

  2. Identify current patterns of ill health and inequality in the UK. Explain probable ...

    There are higher levels of drug misuse, deprivation, and diabetes. The rates of teenage pregnancy, breast feeding, and physical activity in children at school is significantly worse than the England average. East Devon Public Health Profile- The health of people in East Devon is generally better than the England average, as well as life expectancy.

  1. Assess the view that cults, sects and new age movement are fringe organisations that ...

    This shows how a charismatic leader in a new religious movement can convince people to do something they may not think about without being brainwashed in that cult to do so. New religious movements also offer freedom and security from misery of everyday life in contemporary society.

  2. Outline and Assess the Usefulness of Conflict Theories in Explaining Social Class Inequalities in ...

    A consensus theory is Functionalism. Functionalists state that there is class inequality because society is meritocratic. Davis and Moore argue social stratification is a functional necessity and that everyone else should know their position within society resulting in effective role allocation and performance.

  1. Modern Britain is now a secular society

    Religious belief and participation may be the most obvious areas in which to look for evidence for/against secularization.

  2. Assess the argument that rather than eliminating poverty, the Welfare State has created a ...

    on welfare payments inevitable due to the financial constraints placed on individuals. However, the Culture of Poverty was criticised by some sociologists as it ignored structural causes of deprivation. American anthropologist, Walter Miller (1962), claims that the American lower class has its own set of focal concerns that emphasise masculinity,

  1. What are the functionalist, conflict and symbolic interactionist theory of stratification?

    Marx focus more on class conflicts and saw a the society divided in to oppressed labours by those who own the mean of production and alienated the poor worker by preventing them from their real value of their efforts (Baylis, Smith & Owens, 2008; Carter, 2012).

  2. Compare and contrast any two major theoretical perspectives in Sociology.

    (Functional Prerequisite for functionalism, and Economic force for Marxist). Both theories view society as a system of social structures and both agree that these social structures exist within a society. Both focus on the needs of the economy. Functionalists and Marxists stress the importance of socialization process in order to promote solidarity.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work