• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Critically Compare and Contrast Functionalist and Traditional Marxist Perspectives On Crime.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Michelle Deluce Tutor: Joanne Green CRIMINOLOGY Page 1 CRITICALLY COMPARE AND CONTRAST FUNCTIONALIST AND TRADITIONAL MARXIST PERSPECTIVES ON CRIME There are many theories on why crime exists as well has who is committing the crimes and the underlying reasons behind it The two main perspectives being Traditional Marxist and Functionalist both with different views they share very little in common, however they do agree that society shapes the individual and not the individual that shapes society. What is meant by that is that we are all products of our upbringings and learn through socialisation what our beliefs are, what we agree on personally and often shared beliefs and the understanding of what is 'the norm; through our primary interaction with others beginning at home and continuing onto schooling and work. Our beliefs aren't always set in stone and can change through time and growth and the interaction with others once outside the family domain. There are many explanations beginning with Durkheim who was a functionalist, there is Merton who doesn't totally agree with Durkheim but adopted his theory on 'Anomie' and made it his own. In addition there is Hirschi whose theories mirrored that of Durkheim's and before concluding, Marxist view on crime will be looked at. The Functionalist view on crime and society is likening it to the human body to explain it functions. ...read more.

Middle

He created his own model of explanation and the type of bonds we care within society that consisted of four elements; Attachment, deals with how we care for others or have an inability not to have concern, typically a psychopath. The second element commitment, based on personal input into our own lives, for example our work and home environment, material things we own and our children and their education in comparison to a single male living in a Michelle Deluce Tutor: Joanne Green CRIMINOLOGY Page 3 bed-sit on benefits whom is more likely to offend due to a sense of having little to lose. The third, Involvement, a business person involved in legitimised dealings is less likely to offend due to having little time to do so. Then there is belief, a person who abides by the rules and conforms to the norms and acceptable standards within society and perhaps is totally against rule breaking. Marxism has a different slant on why crime exists and the origins of law enforcement compared to the functionalist view. Marxism began with Karl Marx and others after him have shared his view and added their own. His idea in the class divide between the richest in society or the bourgeoisie and those on the lower rung of the societal ladder, the working class, has long been documented. ...read more.

Conclusion

Both concepts were interesting and provided thought and the pioneers of both set precedence and have long since been adapted by others. Hirschi seemed a little too vague in his explanations with very little backup in his theories and his model of four elements seemed flawed. How could he say that a law-abiding person isn't likely to offend and he offers no proof to support his suggestion? He also states that a businessperson would be too involved in business matters not to commit a crime, Marxist would totally disagree, and they would say that he is more likely to be deviant within a corporate structure although should it occur it is highly unlikely the public would be made aware of it. However the question of mental state of an individual hasn't even been raised by any of the sociologists to explain why a person may offend. Merton seemed to make a lot of sense but there seemed to be something missing in his explanations on why crime exists why some commit and others don't, perhaps the reality is there is no definite answer on why it exists. Michelle Deluce Tutor: Joanne Green CRIMINOLOGY Page 5 BIBLOGRAPHY Durkheim, E (1985/1987) Suicide: A Study in Sociology, London: Routledge Erikson, K J. (1966) Wayward Puritans, New York: Wiley Hirschi, T. (1969) Causes of delinquency, Berkeley, CA: University of California Press Merton, R. (1938) Social Structure and Anomie, American Sociological Review, Vol 3, 672-683 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Crime & Deviance section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Crime & Deviance essays

  1. Sociological Theories on Crime and Deviance

    in here and now, rather than waiting for a revolution and a socialist utopia to abolish crime. The central idea behind left realism is that crime is a real problem and one that particularly affects the disadvantaged groups who are its main victims.

  2. Evaluate Functionalist Theories of Crime and Deviance

    This is not necessarily and is usually not true because Crime Statistics are generally flawed, mainly due to the fact that they do not record all crime, under-record certain types of crime such as domestic crime, and most importantly, only show us the actual rate of reported crime, not crime itself.

  1. Outline & Evaluate the Marxist view of crime (45 Marks)

    Cicourel says that policing is also affect by someone's ethnicity. Mark Daley's covert observation of the Manchester police force found that a minority of police officers are still institutionally racist. Marxists believe that the upper class receive more lenient treatment if punished through the criminal justice system.

  2. describe four studies relating to crime and deviance - each from a different perspective. ...

    Within some areas of the lower class segment delinquency may not be seen as deviant - the socialisation process can be different throughout classes establishing different values and norms. Steven Box (1981) suggested that not all youths accept the mainstream standards of success - it is dependant on the values

  1. Assess Marxist theories of crime and deviance.

    However, traditional Marxists have been heavily criticised. Left Realists criticise Marxists for ignoring intra-class crime. Working class crimes are not always committed against middle class people. They also believe that Marxists ignore the seriousness of working class crimes by excusing it and saying that capitalism makes people criminogenic.

  2. Compare and Contrast the Main Sociological Theories of Deviance.

    David Matza, Delinquency and Drift, rejects the idea of a distinct subculture and that this subculture determines behaviour. He claims that delinquents are similar to everyone else in their values and indeed display similar feelings of outrage about crime as the majority of the population.

  1. Outline and assess Functionalist explanations of crime and deviance.

    the easier it is for them to have the means to achieve the goals. The strain comes because the means are not available to the lower classes. This leads to Merton's idea of 'anomie' or normlessness, in this situation norms no longer direct behaviour and deviance is encouraged.

  2. Assess the view that crime is functional, inevitable and normal.

    in people turning to their own selfish devices rather than being controlled by societal agencies. It is possible to see crime as inevitable when, as Charles Murray (1990) describes an 'underclass' has been created. He argues that over the last 30 years there has been an increase in what he calls the 'underclass'.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work