• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Critically compare the three main theories of deviance and assess their strengths & weaknesses

Extracts from this document...


Critically compare the three main theories of deviance and assess their strengths & weaknesses A functionalist analysis of deviance looks for the source of deviance in the nature of society rather than in the biological or psychological nature of the individual. Although functionalists agree that social control mechanisms such as the police and the courts are necessary to keep deviance in check, many argue that a certain amount of deviance can contribute to the well-being of society. Durkhiem (1895) believed that: * Crime is an 'integral part of all healthy societies'. This is because individuals are exposed to different influences and will not be committed to the shared values and beliefs of society. * Crime can be functional. All societies need to progress and all social change begins with some form of deviance. In order for change to occur, yesterday's deviance must become tomorrow's normality. Nelson Mandela, once imprisoned as a 'terrorist', eventually became president of South Africa. * Societies need both crime and punishment. Without punishment the crime rate would reach a point where it became dysfunctional. Durkheim's views have been developed by A. ...read more.


5. Now a deviant subculture may develop which includes norms and values which support their deviant behaviour. Becker's approach is used by Jock Young (1971) in his study of 'hippie' marijuana users in London. 1. The police see hippies as dirty, lazy drug addicts. 2. Police action against marijuana users unites them and makes them feel different. 3. As a result they retreat into small groups. 4. Deviant norms and values develop in these closed groups. Hair is grown longer, clothes become more unconventional and drug use becomes a central activity. Thus a self-fulfilling prophecy is created. Lemert (1972) distinguishes between 'primary' and 'secondary' deviance. Primary deviance consists of deviant acts before they are publicly labelled. Trying to find the causes of primary deviance is not very helpful because: * Samples of deviants are inevitably based only on those who have been labelled, and they are therefore unrepresentative. * Most deviant acts are so common that they may be, in statistical terms, normal. Most males may at some time commit a homosexual act, engage in delinquency and so on. The important factor in creating 'deviance' is the reaction of society - the public identification of the deviant. ...read more.


Feminists have argued that Marxist theories ignore the importance of patriarchy in influencing the criminal justice system. Marxists have also been accused of neglecting the importance of racism in the enforcement of law. 2. Crime has not been eradicated in communist societies based on Marxist principles. 3. Stephen Jones (1998) points out that capitalism does not always produce high crime rates. For example, in Switzerland the crime rate is very low. 4. Perhaps the distribution of power is not as simple as some Marxists suggest. Jones gives the example of insider trading (taking advantage of 'insider' knowledge to make huge profits on the stock exchange). This is illegal, which suggests that capitalists do not always get the laws they want. 5. 'Left Realists' believe that Marxists put too much emphasis on corporate crime. Other crimes such as burglary cause greater harm than Marxists imply. Their victims are usually working-class and the consequences can be devastating for them. 6. Post-modern Criminology rejects Marxist criminology as being neither believable nor defensible. Despite these criticisms, Marxism has been an influence on a number of critical perspectives on deviance. Some have drawn their inspiration from Marxism and can be referred to as neo-Marxist approaches. Others owe less to Marxism and are better defined as radical approaches. Chirag Patel - 1 - ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Crime & Deviance section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Crime & Deviance essays

  1. Sociological Theories on Crime and Deviance

    It links the study of deviance to social inequality. Based on the work of Karl Marx, conflict theory sees a dominant class as controlling the resources of society and using its power to create the institutional rules and belief systems that support its power.

  2. describe four studies relating to crime and deviance - each from a different perspective. ...

    For Cohen the subculture offers positive rewards pertaining to status, however the subculture will impose certain criteria on its members in order to gain this recognition and prestige. (Haralambos, 2000, page 357) Cohen expressed that the actions of the delinquent subculture often demonstrate animosity for those able to participate legitimately within society, thus rebelling against an unjust system.

  1. Assess Marxist theories of crime and deviance.

    Snider argues that white-collar crime is a much more serious crime as it causes more harm than working class crime and costs more in money. An example of this is factories that break health and safety laws that then cause thousands of people to die from pollution.

  2. Outline and Assess Subcultural Theories of Crime and Deviance

    in El Barrio, was due to the marginalisation and alienation from mainstream American Society, which many residents encountered daily. The change of drugs and scale which Bougois monitored was widespread and dramatic, with everyone in the society involved. However, although they did not share the same means as mainstream America,

  1. Compare and Contrast the Main Sociological Theories of Deviance.

    This is sharply at odds with Durkheim's view that particular societies exert special pressure for higher rates of deviation. Durkheim also ignores conflicts about morality within a society, which is the stock in trade of the labelling theorist. Equally important, Durkheim, while accepting the relative nature of crime, also seems

  2. Assess the usefulness of consensus theories for an understanding of crime and deviance in ...

    Thus, they formulate their own dissimilar set of values, as a kind of alternative route to gaining status. Cohen built on Merton's theory of 'strain theory' which holds that society places much emphasis on material success that many people experience pressure to deviate from accepted norms and values.

  1. 2 Examine critically the contribution of labelling theory to our understanding of deviance.

    More often than not women are put in a position of economic dependence as the man is often the only or majority earner. There are many relationships where the man uses his power to get what they want. This is more commonly known as domestic violence, it is estimated that

  2. Critically Compare and Contrast Functionalist and Traditional Marxist Perspectives On Crime.

    people offend whereas others do not and there is no argument on laws and their validity on how they benefit society as a whole. Marxists would strongly criticise the way Durkheim seems to be ignorant of the 'concepts of power' and how a small number of people in power have

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work