• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Discuss the similarities and differences between conflict of Marxist theories and functionalist theories in sociology.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

´╗┐Dee-Anne Dottin Sociology Ms. Gibbs Question: Discuss the similarities and differences between conflict of Marxist theories and functionalist theories in sociology. 25 marks Although sociology is a recently developed field of study, the advancement of the study is progressing rapidly. Sociological theories are ways sociologists explain society and its mega structure. The structural conflict and structural consensus theories are inevitable chapters of sociology. With some similarities, these two theories have different ideologies and ways of explaining the society. Both theories view society as a system of social structures and both agree that these social structures exist within a society. However, the two theories differ greatly in their opinion on the purpose of these structures. Functionalism views the system of social structures as entities that work together for the benefit of all, but Marxism believes the system of social structures are in place but vary in their benefits depending on the wealth and power of the people involved. involved. Functionalism, the structural consensus sociological theory is a key theory that was developed by Emile Durkheim, one of the founding fathers of sociology. This theory sees society as a mega structure of inter-related social institutions such as schools and the legal system that is in constant consensus. ...read more.

Middle

The main ideologies of the structural consensus and structural conflict theory stand parallel to each other and can never come to an agreeing point. One of Functionalismâs key concepts is the collective conscience brought up by Emile Durkheim, which is defined as shared norms and valued in a society. Functionalists believe that collective conscious comes from socialization. Individuals learn what are the societyâs expectations, values and norms from interacting with others. In contrast, Marxism spoke on the conflict of interest within the society itself. The bourgeoisie wants monopolization and more riches to themselves which will result in the tyrant exploitation of proletariats while the proletariats want more wages and fair working hours. To sum up, Functionalism spoke on how all individuals in society is in consensus with the social order and social rules whereas Marxism touches on the subject of how conflict is within the society. Another key concept in Functionalism and Marxism can be compared which is the theory of social equilibrium by Talcott Parsons and the theory of dialectical materialism by Joseph Dietzgen. In sociology, a system is said to be social equilibrium when there is a dynamic working balance among its interdependent parts. ...read more.

Conclusion

Both Marxism and Functionalism theories are macrospective. This means that the two theories look at society as a whole rather than looking at it from the individual point of view. Both Marxism and Functionalism look at the structures within a society such as family and education, and debate how these affect the individual instead of how the individual affects the structures. Similarly, both theories look at the overall structure of society and argue that education prepares pupils for their position in society whether it is an equal or unequal position. Seeing that these two theories are macro theories but the ideologies are a big contrast. Functionalism helps us understand how society is integrated to function as a whole. Marxism wakes us and gets us to understand more on the exploitations we are exposed to. Functionalism and Marxism are sociological perspectives that ask, and state, certain theories about society and the people that live within it. The two theories attempt to explain how society influences people, and similarly how people influence society. However, the two ideologies are distinctly different. They're so different in fact that only two similarities exist between the two theories.Without functionalism and Marxism, sociology would be very inadequate. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Sociological Differentiation & Stratification section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Sociological Differentiation & Stratification essays

  1. Peer reviewed

    Produce an essay identifying the different sociological approaches to secularisation with reference to Marxism, ...

    4 star(s)

    Karl Marx looked at religion as coming to an end. He saw religion as a reflection of class society; it would justify the position of the ruling class. Additionally it would serve the lower class with faith of hope in life after-death and give the hope of a happier life for their suffering on earth.

  2. Difference and similarities between 2 societies - China and the UK

    In conclusion, Chinese society and British society have plenty of similarities because of the globalization.

  1. Sociological Theories

    They consider crime and deviance as dysfunctional and a threat to order but, they also believe that the public response to crime is functional because it serves to integrate societies. Karl Marx however sees crime and deviance as a natural growth of the capitalist society.

  2. Compare and contrast Marxist and functionalist views of religion.

    The Marxist view of religion, however seems to think different. Marx believes that religion is an illusion which eases the pain produced by exploition and oppression. They believe that it is a series of myths that justify the subordination of the lower classes and the domination of the ruling class.

  1. Can and should sociology be a science?

    Also, sociology should not be a science because a non scientific approach generates data that is highly valid, insightful and achieves verstehen. For example interpretivist feminists, Dobash gained a true and detailed understanding of women's experience of domestic violence by carrying out informal interviews which lasted for up to twelve hours.

  2. essay question sociology - education

    well realize that its just Marx on the other hand state school socializes students for the interest of the upper class. It teaches the children those norms and values which benefit the upper class (they have ideological control) for example importance of being punctual, respectful to authority, disciple and expect rewards.

  1. Evaluation of Functionalism and Marxism

    who own and control the means of production, and on the other side you have the subject class (or the proletariat)

  2. Two concepts of society are functionalism and Marxism.

    This provides us with our values which support the society. A Marxist would disagree with this view, they see social control agencies being used by the bourgeoisie to control the working class and that education gives people their values which support the bourgeoisie exploitation.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work