• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Do the Media have the power to shape public opinion?

Extracts from this document...


Do the Media have the power to shape public opinion? With the rise of the mass media throughout the world, predominantly the Western world, the issue of media influence has become a serious one. With state and capitalist controlled media industries throughout the world how can we be sure that what we are being told is accurate or even true at all? The many forms of media only serve to accentuate such influences; Rupert Murdoch for example owns a huge portion of the British media industry. With his obvious personal interests and huge influential powers is there really anyway of being certain that the media are not just projecting his personal slant upon reality to ensure civil obedience to serve his capitalist interests. The same is true of state controlled media such as in China where people are exposed to only Chinese propaganda. Such issues have created heated debate throughout the world and many theories of how influential media influence is have been proposed. Adorno and Horkheimer developed the theory of a 'Culture Industry', which they believe has lead to the usurpation of public opinion. People's actions are shrewdly influenced by their own subscription to this industry leaving no room for autonomous thought or action. Habermas developed the theory of the 'public sphere' in which people can talk freely of public interest matters such as politics. This freedom has been suppressed by the culture industry. A more recent, but similarly critical account of the media is proposed by Baudrillard who believes the mass media are 'all-powerful, coning the phrase 'hyperreality' which, when summarised basically means that the media no longer represents the outside world, there is no 'reality' as such, instead the media 'redefines what the world in which we live actually is'.[1]coba bar sebabaw orba bak inba foba ba. A more positive view based upon a similar idea to that of Habermas is that of John Thompson who analyses the links between industrialisation and the media. ...read more.


With our living rooms we are beamed images of wars, humanitarian crises, political developments, basically anything that is happening in the world as attainable on film. This is the process in which representations of things come to replace the things being represented, representations become more important than the "real thing". Baudrillard argues that today we only experience prepared realities such as edited war footage, meaningless acts of terrorism, the Jerry Springer Show. Baudrillard writes 'The very definition of the real has become: that of which it is possible to give an equivalent reproduction. The real is not only what can be reproduced, but that which is always already reproduced: that is the hyperreal. . . which is entirely in simulation.'[4] acidicburn83, please do not redistribute this paper. We work very hard to create this website, and we trust our visitors to respect it for the good of other students. Please, do not circulate this paper elsewhere on the internet. Anybody found doing so will be permanently banned. Hyperreality is conducted through simulacra, which are symbols such as television images which have no relation to reality instead they simulate a simulation, they are 'grounded in an external reality'[5] These include television programmes and computer games which seem to have had a profound impact upon children's perception of the world. Critics of Baudrillard state that he fails to take into account the benefits that modern technology has create such as the Internet and entertainment value of both TV and computer games. By insinuating that the media are attempting to deceive the general public he is forgetting that the general public must actually subscribe to viewing/listening/reading their media so, to some extent, they must contain things which the public want to be exposed to. Though it is true that most all media there is an underlying interest but what does one make of the BBC, which strives to provide a neutral, public service? ...read more.


Miller examined voter intentions a month before the election to see whether the propaganda that was printed in the run up to the election would have an effect. He found that the people who had been floating voters had been affected and as a result caused a swing that secured a victory for Mrs Thatcher. Although one can never be sure that it really was the medias influence that caused the swing to the right, if we are to accept that it was then one could say how the media basically moulded public opinion to their interests and secured a their desired result. When the margins are small then media influence can be crucial to determining which direction the result will go. It would seem that none of the evidence or proposals discussed above have enough credibility for me to conclude that the media really do have the power to shape public opinion. The critical theories of the Frankfurt school appear to be blinded by their Marxist ideology and unable see past the capitalist aspect of the media industry. More modern theories such as Thompson and Baudrillard propose new and novel concepts to explain media influence but still fail to substantiate such claims with conclusive empirical support. Of the empirical studies outlined, none of them go far enough to address the issue at hand. This is an intrinsic problem to such an question, no matter what research is conducted one can never know for certain what influences what and to what extent. Correlation might be indicative but that is really as far as we can take such issues. As subjects living within the realms of the media perhaps we are, as Adorno and Horkheimer believe, manipulated by the mass media making us unable to see the problems because of the brainwashing effects. Nevertheless we should remain cautious of anyone who purports that the media really do shape public opinion as it would seem that there is no possible way to substantiate such claims. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Media section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Media essays

  1. Does violence in the media effect peoples behaviours and opinions?

    This question is directly linked to aim 1 as it promotes respondents to divulge whether they believe children are more at risk to the harms of violent media. It is also linked to aim 2 as it compares data from both parents and teenagers.

  2. How is Crime represented in the Media

    Since 1995 there has been a significant decrease of Crime, currently the level of crime remains constant. In between 1993-95 there was a considerable increase of Crime. * Based on BCS( British Crime Survey) interviews in 2005/06, it is estimated that there were approximately 10.9 million crimes against adults living in private households.

  1. Sociology Structural Theory and The Media

    The media has a great impact on how people in society understand how they live. From the functionalist perspective the role of the media is to firstly give information across society and is also used as a form of social control by broadcasting to the population values that reflect a particular society.

  2. "Any sociological explanation of the influence of the mass media needs to take into ...

    But we don't equally depend on all media. This is because of the presence of our dependency in our social stability. When social change and conflict are high, established institutions, beliefs, and practices are challenged are forcing you to reevaluate and make new choices.

  1. What are some of the key messages and ideas presented in the novella, Fahrenheit ...

    This is accentuated when we read Montag's disbelief that, "had he not been out of the way, the teenagers would have killed him, for no reason at all in the world!" Bradbury presents many other aspects of how our world has evolved today, fifty two years ago, with shocking accuracy.

  2. Why is media history important?

    It was a paper very much for the middle classes. It was the dominant paper of the time, however it had reformist ideas. It was met with anger from the government, as it refused to be the voice of the government.

  1. Examine the ways in which the output of the mass media may be influenced ...

    Their findings of the media reflect the assumptions of the powerful society whilst marginalising the views of others. This organisation analysed the Gulf War, by looking at the language used to describe the Iraqis. They also analysed the reports of strikes on television.

  2. To what extent does the Media affect body image in teens and their perception ...

    In fact they may be ignored by the conscious brain and be beyond the level of conscious perception[20]. A new study by Prof. Naomi Mandel, as sited in CBS News, has shown companies that feature normal size women, better known, as ?plus-size? are less effective than those that use thin models.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work