• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month


Extracts from this document...


EVALUATE FUNCTIONALIST EXPLANATIONS OF THE ROLE OF EDUCATION IN MODERN SOCIETY Functionalism is a way of looking at society and argues that we all share very similar values and we basically agree about what is right. They argue that society is in harmony and that all parts of society contribute to the way it functions. These parts are the family, education, the legal system, religion etc. This is known as the 'consensus theory'. Marxists argue that society is not in harmony and that the ordinary people are exploited by the wealthy. They see every part of society contributing to this exploitation. In this essay I will be comparing the functionalists and Marxists views of the role of education in modern society. Functionalists claim that education contributes to society. They believe that schools pass on the culture of society from one generation to the next, schools continue the process of socialisation that begins in the family; therefore, they act as agencies of socialisations and because children are socialised into a shared set of values, education can help them feel they belong to a particular society and that they have shared interests with other members of that society. ...read more.


However, conflict theorists, such as Marxists, see education in schools as justifying and perpetuating inequality. Bowles and Gintis, who have a Marxist perspective on education, claim that the major role of education in capitalist societies is the reproduction of labour power - a hard-working disciplined workforce. Bowles and Gintis argue that such a workforce is reproduced in two ways, through the hidden curriculum of schooling and the correspondence, or very close similarity, between the social relationships at school and work in particular, the way schooling operates the 'long shadow of work'. The second way was through the role of the education system in legitimizing or justifying inequality. Bowles and Gintis argue that the hidden curriculum in schools corresponds closely to many features of the workplace, for example, males and females often playing sports, having different dress rules, and being counselled into different subjects, further education courses, and careers; many teachers having different expectations of boys and girls. In the work place males and females being encouraged to conform to gender stereotypes and work in different jobs; for example, women being encouraged into taking primary responsibility for housework and childcare. ...read more.


They thought that school was boring, pointless and irrelevant to their lives, and stopped them smoking, drinking, going out at night, getting a job and cash and involving themselves in the 'real' world of male, manual work. Willis found a similarity between the counter-school culture and the workplace culture of male lower working class jobs, such as sexism, a lack of respect for authority and an emphasis on having a 'laff' to escape the boring oppressive nature of both school and work. His research suggests that schools are not directly preparing the sort of obedient and docile labour force required by capitalism which Bowles and Gintis suggest. Young, working-class males are not forced or persuaded by the school to leave and look for manual jobs, but actively reject school through the counter-school culture and willingly enter male semi and unskilled work the minute they leave school. To conclude functionalists and Marxists have opposite views on how education affects society; functionalists say that educations allows society to run smoothly and Marxists say that education shows inequality towards society. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Work & Leisure section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Work & Leisure essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Critically Evaluate the Functionalist Perspective on Education

    5 star(s)

    In theory this role of the education system means that all students start form the same point and therefore are given the same opportunities to excel their abilities. This recognises that the education system is a means for upward social mobility for those whom have the ability.

  2. Compare and contrast the Marxist and Functionalist views on the role of education in ...

    Gintis and Bowles believe that overall the hidden curriculum produces a passive and obedient workforce, which accepts authority without question, which is motivated by external rewards, and which is fragmented. This links in with what Marxists believe to be the ruling class.

  1. What is education for? Critically evaluate the diverse functions of education with reference to ...

    this type of examination suited the resources and lifestyles of the middle classes. As well as class inequality the system was experiencing gender inequalities, girls places at grammar school were being restricted. There was a feeling around the time girls should be prepared for married life and motherhood as a

  2. Examination of the Functionalist view that schools serve the interests of both society and ...

    The functionalist perspective on the education system is that it is a fair and meritocratic way of educating children with societies values and norms. It provides them with specific skills needed to help them become valuable and consensual members of society.

  1. Assess the role of education form the functionalist perspective

    most talented in to the most functionally most important jobs in society, differentiating between pupils.

  2. Using material from Item A and elsewhere assess the contribution of functionalist sociology to ...

    the school prepares the children for this transmission and prepares them for society as a whole. Within schools, education operates on a meritocratic basis. Standards are applied to all students regardless of sex, race, family background or class. Parsons, like Durkhiem stated that school represent society in miniature.

  1. Sociological explanations of under achievement.

    on social backgrounds, they believe that a person with a high class background is more likely to attend higher qualification or higher occupations, as if we consider interactionalists theory so we find their views quite different although their views are ideal in some issues with functionalists because they both see

  2. Examine sociological explanations of the relationship between education and the economy

    It was unrealistic not many people were 100% in a category they were in between and this didn't show up in Willis results. Vocational Education was introduced because when students left school and went to work they didn't really possess the appropriate skills for work or the correct attitude.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work