EVALUATE FUNCTIONALIST EXPLANATIONS OF THE ROLE OF EDUCATION IN MODERN SOCIETY
EVALUATE FUNCTIONALIST EXPLANATIONS OF THE ROLE OF EDUCATION IN MODERN SOCIETY
Functionalism is a way of looking at society and argues that we all share very similar values and we basically agree about what is right. They argue that society is in harmony and that all parts of society contribute to the way it functions. These parts are the family, education, the legal system, religion etc. This is known as the ‘consensus theory’.
Marxists argue that society is not in harmony and that the ordinary people are exploited by the wealthy. They see every part of society contributing to this exploitation.
In this essay I will be comparing the functionalists and Marxists views of the role of education in modern society.
Functionalists claim that education contributes to society. They believe that schools pass on the culture of society from one generation to the next, schools continue the process of socialisation that begins in the family; therefore, they act as agencies of socialisations and because children are socialised into a shared set of values, education can help them feel they belong to a particular society and that they have shared interests with other members of that society. A second contribution schools make to the smooth running of the society is through ’sifting and sorting’ people into different occupational roles. Those who do well in the education system are rewarded by being able to reach occupations that have high pay and high status. In effect, schools identify students’ skills and abilities, selecting the more able for more challenging and advanced studies and guiding others towards courses and work more suited to their abilities. This has been described as meritocracy. Social background is not seen as important. Because of the teaching of a shared value system, it is accepted as fair by most people; those who are successful are seen as deserving their success, and those who miss out blame themselves rather than the system. This system allows plenty of social mobility; people from working-class backgrounds can be upwardly mobile if they merit this.