• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Evaluate Functionalist Theories of Crime and Deviance

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Evaluate Functionalist Theories on Crime and Deviance Crime is defined as behaviour that breaks laws and is punished by the legal system. Deviance, on the other hand, can be considered to be banned or controlled behaviour which is likely to attract either punishment, disapproval or both (Downes & Rock, 1988). Functionalists view society as based on shared consensus and the proliferation of this shared consensus through socialization by institutions. This makes it particularly difficult for them to deal with the concept of crime and deviance- because in a perfect Functionalist society, crime and deviance would not occur. While some Functionalist theorists, notably Durkheim, regard crime as having a social function, others, including Merton, who point to the strain between socialized aims and reality as the true cause of crime. Durkheim (1897) argues that crime and deviance are useful and necessary in society. It helps to reinforce the consensus of values, norms and behaviour of the majority non-deviant population, through the idea of outrage at crime which strengthens social solidarity. It also acts as a social dynamic which allows for social changes to occur and for social boundaries to be tested, ensuring that a society, its norms and values and its laws stay in line with the social consensus. Durkheim also sees Crime and Deviance as a provider of employment for law enforcement. ...read more.

Middle

Furthermore, it could be argued that Cohen's theory is at the very least quite deterministic- mainly due to its assumption that boys from working-class and lower socioeconomic groups were invariably destined to fail within the educational system. This point fades in credibility when we take into account that a good proportion of boys from working-class backgrounds have managed to avoid being pulled into the cycle of deviance and crime. Matza, in "Delinquency and Drift" (1964) argues that deviants do not necessarily reject the wider values and norms of society. He puts forward the idea of a dual-value system in which conventional and subterranean values exist side-by-side, with a conflict between the two varying value systems. This results in a form of normative confusion, especially in the period of transition between childhood and adulthood- resulting in a corresponding rise in deviant behaviour, followed by a settlement back into normal behaviour once the period of confusion has run its course. This explains the reasons behind youth 'delinquency' and deviance. However, Interactionists would argue that Matza's theories do not actually reflect the truth- as some do not fall into the cycle of deviant behaviour caused by the conflict between subterranean and conventional values. They would also criticize the assumption that deviant behaviour is caused by the influence of a 'value system', instead emphasising the role of human interaction and the learning process behind this as an alternative reason behind youth deviance and delinquency. ...read more.

Conclusion

Functionalist theories also glaringly ignore the concept of "power" in defining the idea of what "crime" and "deviant behaviour", opting instead to consign this to a so-called "consensus". Marxists would instead point to the idea of crime being classified as crime by those in power- the Capitalist Ruling Class, for their own economic and political advantage. The "high rate of working-class delinquency" cited by both Matza and Miller and used as a basis for their studies is perhaps a result of either over-policing, which itself can be seen by Interactionists as policing according to public perceptions/demands, or by Marxists as a form of oppression. In conclusion, it can be said that although Functionalist theories do indeed go a long way in explaining the reasons for Crime and Deviance, they do leave a lot to be desired- mainly through failing to take into account the concept of power in relation to crimes and law-making, and their overly deterministic view of society and the manner in which it shapes and forms human behaviour. However, it should be said that Functionalist theories are useful in explaining crime and deviance- perhaps with the use of other complimentary theories or triangulation and methodological pluralism to balance out the clear problems and challenges associated with Functionalist theory. ?? ?? ?? ?? Edwin Loo 13K 17/10/2007 Sociology Essay Page 4 of 4 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Crime & Deviance section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Crime & Deviance essays

  1. Sociological Theories on Crime and Deviance

    Merton's structural strain theory traces the origins of deviance to the tensions caused by the gap between cultural goals and the means people have to achieve these goals. In society, culture establishes goals for people; social structures provide, or fail to provide, the means for people to achieve those goals.

  2. describe four studies relating to crime and deviance - each from a different perspective. ...

    Cohen's (1955) study of delinquent subculture extends an insight into the reasons why some juveniles deviate from the generally accepted guidelines of society. Cohen was interested in the development of the delinquent subculture and its reasons for existence. He found that delinquency was more dominant in males situated in the

  1. Critically Compare and Contrast Functionalist and Traditional Marxist Perspectives On Crime.

    Innovation, a response to acception of the goals but rejection of the means therefore a person is more likely to commit crimes to obtain financial rewards. Ritualism, an acception of the goals and conformity to the means but lack of sight of any goals or may simply 'go through the motions' with no real interest in the outcome.

  2. The Strengths and Limitations of Left Realism and Right Realism Theories in Explaining Crime ...

    to have a conscious, knowing what is right and wrong and preventing them from getting in trouble with the police. But in a family where this close-knit relationship is lacking adequate socialisation is unlikely. So, Wilson and Hernstein believe that with the development of a more permissive society the quality

  1. Assess Marxist theories of crime and deviance.

    Slavery benefits capitalists as then they do not have to pay them and so maximise their profits. In modernity, after the invention of machinery, slavery was no longer needed as machines are faster, do not require sleep or feeding and make more money.

  2. The Sociology of Crime and Deviance

    Marxists recognise that for a society to function efficiently, social order is necessary. However, apart from communist societies, they consider that in all societies one class - the ruling class - gains far more than other classes. Marxists agree with functionalists that socialisation plays a crucial role in promoting conformity and order.

  1. Assess functionalist theories of crime and deviance.

    Also, Marxists argue that people are selfish but only because Capitalism makes people selfish as it benefits the ruling class by causing class fragmentation and preventing class solidarity. Capitalists also profit financially from consumerism and the hard work people do in order to consume.

  2. Assess Interactionist theories of crime and deviance.

    Becker goes on to say that when a person is labelled as deviant it becomes their master status, this then affects their self-concept, which leads them onto a deviant career that thereby becomes a self fulfilling prophecy. Interactionists believe that agents of social control amplify deviance.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work