• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Evaluate Sociological Explanations of the Relationship between Religion & Social Change

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Evaluate Sociological Explanations of the Relationship between Religion & Social Change The relationship between religion and social change has forever wielded many sociological explanations attempting to comment on this ambiguous issue. While some favour the view religion does indeed promote social change (Weber), others argue religion inhibits social change (Durkheim). Firstly it's important to understand what is meant by the concept social change. From a sociologists view point, social change in terms of religion can be used to change the politics, economics, or values of a society. This can be illustrated from a contemporary standpoint by reflecting on the Buddhist monks in Burma. These monks are using their religious and spiritual beliefs to change the society they live in. Speaking from a more historical context however, we can see that the religions of Ghandi, Martin Luther King and Mother Teresa, have been used and some may argue exploited; to change wider society. ...read more.

Middle

Of course there are certain examples of this which support Marxist theory, the fact religion prevented a revolution in the 20th century was 'keeping the working classes in check' and this further supports their view religion is a conservative force which favours the ruling classes and inhibits social change. However, critically speaking Marxist theory like Functionalists theory doesn't take into account mass examples where religion has been used to promote social change, Liberation theology, French and Russian revolutions in the 20th century, The Taliban in the middle East - all ways in how religion has cased social change and all ways Marxist theory on religion can be disproved. Max Weber (The Protestant Ethic & the Spirit of Capitalism 1958) was sympathetic to the fact religion can be used as a conservative force but noted how it could be used radically as a vehicle for social change. Calvinists were a seventieth century protestant sect that believed in pre destination, this was only the elect was to reach heaven. ...read more.

Conclusion

a way they can justify, this can therefore lead to sociologists questioning the nature of the social change, and whether it can be tightly tied to religion may be hard to measure. Finally post modernists see religion as an indicator in social change arguing the change in religion reflects the shift from modernity to post modernity. Post modernists see society in constant change where there are no absolute truths, the decline in rationalism and growth of religious pluralism undermine the traditional community dimension of religion. They see the very rise of post modernity the resurgence of religion and the many ways some religions can be conservative or radial based on culture or location. The relationship between religion and social change has forever been of great sociological debate but with the emergence of post modernism and the many new religions forming it compels us to contemplate new definitions of religion, most of which contribute a radical or conservative force in society either inhibiting or promoting social change ?? ?? ?? ?? Jason Kane ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Sociological Differentiation & Stratification section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Here's what a star student thought of this essay

4 star(s)

Response to the question

The writer definitely answers the specific question asked, as they explain how religion can be viewed as both a conservative force and as a radical force for social change. By referring to both arguments, lots of evaluative points can be ...

Read full review

Response to the question

The writer definitely answers the specific question asked, as they explain how religion can be viewed as both a conservative force and as a radical force for social change. By referring to both arguments, lots of evaluative points can be awarded, which is actually what the majority of marks in sociology are given for. Most candidates tend to forget that they need to continually evaluate; instead lots of people only write about sociological theories in a list fashion, which examiners hate. This essay is well structured, with an apt introduction and conclusion, which will get them a decent grade.

Level of analysis

This candidate clearly has a good all round academic knowledge, but occasionally they make a few mistakes that although seem minor, are actually vital to get right in order to gain more marks. An example that jumps out at me is: “Calvinists were a seventieth century protestant sect”, as it was a seventeenth century sect. I would also argue that the candidate needs to specifically explain liberation theology further – as it massively contributed to social change – because the point is vague, “Liberation theology was a fuse of Christianity and Marxism and was used to radically change society”. How was it used to radically change society? They should mention that priests educated peasants in order to help them get out of rural poverty in Latin America in the 1960s.
The candidate makes good use of contemporary issues/examples in relation to how religion has been a radical force for change, such as “Another example of fundamentalism promoting social change would be that of mainly Islamic groups. The September 11th attacks can be explained in terms of social and economic change”. This is in addition to historical social change, for instance Weber’s theory that Calvinism was a major influence in the creation of a new society, capitalism.
Sociological key terms, “Liberation theology” and “religious pluralism” are mentioned, which is very good, because, in my experience, most candidates have a tendency to not bother with the terms that sound complicated. But the writer will be credited for weaving these so well into their essay.

Quality of writing

There are a fair few grammatical issues in this essay. There are random capital letters in the middle of sentences, “Industrialisation” and the wrong word is sometimes used, “off course” instead of “of course”. It also mentions “terrorist’s attacks” when it should simply be “terrorist attacks”. On the whole though spelling is good, although I did notice the writer abbreviated “September” to “Sept” which I think gives a bit of an informal (and perhaps lazy) impression. If this issues were corrected I think a slightly higher mark would be reflected.


Did you find this review helpful? Join our team of reviewers and help other students learn

Reviewed by cwhite 23/03/2012

Read less
Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Sociological Differentiation & Stratification essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    'Assess sociological explanations of changes to the class structure

    4 star(s)

    As it will result in polarisation of the classes (there are two classes according to Marx, these are the Bourgeoisie (the ruling class) and the Proletariats (the workers)). However another theory from Mount(2004), who is a social commentator; he argued that British society has failed the poor and that society

  2. The education system is meritocratic

    their parents did and this means that a meritocracy where people can move up and down the social ladder must exist as if it did not then their would be no working class kids in universities.

  1. Can and should sociology be a science?

    However, suspension is difficult to accomplish but that abandoning the effort would be disastrous. Karl Marx opposed Weber as he thought that social scientists should bring strong moral commitments to their work and use science to change inequitable or immoral social conditions.

  2. Outline and Assess Whether stratification is either inevitable or beneficial to individuals and society?

    These parties form around social classes. Weber's ideas have influenced the way in which social class is operationalised by sociologists such as Goldthorpe and by the government through the recent NS-SEC scale. In evaluation of Weber's theory Marxists argue, that they neglected the basic split between capitalists and workers and

  1. Free essay

    Is religion a conservative force or a force for social change?

    Due to these extreme actions the status quo is maintained. However, fundamentalist ideas can also cause social change. Grace Davie defined 6 main characteristics of which need to be present for fundamentalism to occur. These include: 1. Rapid social change in society 2.

  2. Identify current patterns of ill health and inequality in the UK. Explain probable ...

    Since the 1970's smoking prevalence has fallen rapidly and a survey in 2007 showed that around a fifth 22% of men aged 16 and over were reported as smokers. The same survey reported that in 2007 20% of women aged over 16 were reported as smokers.

  1. Compare and contrast two sociological theories

    Because others have felt it was necessary and acted on that thought with an ordinance for recycling bin placement, you are now influenced by their actions. Marxism offers a different means of creating change, conflict and revolution. The lower class must band together and fight the upper class if they want equal rights and suitable working conditions.

  2. Discuss the bio-medical model of health.

    However the social model argues that the biomedical model ignores the individuals opinion on what is making them ill, even when they are faced with the clinical iceberg. They suggest that a lay person?s (public person or one not of the medical profession)

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work