• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Evaluate the accuracy of official statistics of crime.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Evaluate the accuracy of official statistics of crime. Official statistics of crime are collected by the home office which means that patterns and trends can easily be found. Positivists favour this as they believe them to be social facts. Durkheim used them in his study of suicide, he felt that society was not reducible to individuals. And he found out that there was a significant variation in rates of suicide of different populations and that they stayed remarkably consistent over time. From this he found four different types of suicide which showed why a person may have committed suicide. He concluded that suicide is not an individual act but has its roots in society. However, Interpretivists would question the usefulness of official statistics, Douglas suggested that statistical approaches into suicides like Durkheim's ignore meanings that individuals have for committing suicide. Douglas believed that to interpret why a person had committed suicide you had to get into the 'inner world' of the suicide person, i.e. read their diaries and suicide notes. Positivists argue that official statistics are useful in gaining an insight into crime as they show who, what and where. Another key strength is that patterns and trends can easily be identified and so therefore analysis is easy which allows correlations to be made. ...read more.

Middle

Many crimes such as corporate crime and victimless crimes are excluded and crimes against under 16 year olds are also excluded. Despite victim surveys being anonymous it seems that people it seems that people still seem to under-report sexual offences, and also basing statistics on victims memories can be biased. There are also problems of accuracy as the BCS often chooses the sample used, also as the participants are given a computer to key in offences committed against them the BCS can get away with not putting official or legal categories into the computer, further effecting the validity of ant crime statistics. Figures like these do not appear in official statistics so its validity could be questioned. The police play a large part in official statistics as it is left to them to decide what is considered to be or not to be a crime; only 40 % of crime that is reported to the police is actually recorded. Many police departments want their area to look like its crime statistics are under the nation's average. There are many ways for them to do this one of which is 'cuffing' this is where a current prisoner will be asked to admit to crimes he/she did not commit, they will not be prosecuted for this. ...read more.

Conclusion

Only about 30% of crime is solved therefore we cannot tell to what extent convicted criminals resemble un-convicted ones. Offences are cleared up by either primary means or secondary means which can be unreliable as secondary means involve a prisoner admitting to a crime which due to cuffing they may not have done. New counting rules saw the clear up rates for England and Wales go down from 38% in 1981 to 29% in 1998-99. Crime statistics in England, Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland can't be directly compared as the legal systems differ. Also the counting rules differ as in Scotland each individual offence occurring within an incident is recorded whereas in the other countries only the main offence is counted. Institutionalists reject the objectivity of official figures and attempt to show how they are neither valid nor reliable. They say that statistics do not show the real picture as most crime is out of sight out of mind. However, Realists would argue that the figures are objective indicators of the social phenomenon they are supposed to reflect, they deny that the problems arising are a result of power but are instead the product of technical incompetence. Marxists believe that law and its enforcement reflects the interests of the ruling class. The crimes of the poor are strictly enforced and the immoral activities of the rich are either ignored or not defined as criminal, statistics well reflect these inequalities and scapegoating. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Crime & Deviance section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Crime & Deviance essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Assess the Usefulness of Official Crime Statistics to a Sociological Understanding of Crime

    4 star(s)

    Official statistics are often influenced or socially constructed by those compiling the statistics. This can be seen by the perception that ethnic minorities are perceived to be responsible for a high incidence of crime but the police often target areas where large numbers of ethnic minorities live.

  2. 'Evaluate the use and importance of official crime statistics both in the tracking of ...

    within the official crime statistics as perpetrated by predominantly young men of low socio-economic status. Amongst these, the uneducated, unemployed and ethnic minorities are over-represented and form the bulk of the prison population. This apparently tells us that particular sections of the populace are the most likely perpetrators of crime and criminal activity within society.

  1. Critically evaluate Marxists contributions to the study of crime and deviance.

    And threat - where both police and the army are used to enforce the full existence of threat and violence. Marxists saw the working class as major criminals, crime explanations focus on working class life, instead of the lives of the powerful.

  2. Discuss the accuracy of Crime Statistics in The Uk

    So these statistics are in some ways given greater authority when people look at crime data as it records more types of crime. Thefts and criminal damage make up 44% of police recorded crime, whilst the BCS records vandalism and thefts as 57% of all crime committed.

  1. Outline and assess the usefulness of official statistics in measuring crime and deviance

    has taken place, the crime must be reported and the police or other agencies of the legal system have to accept a law has been broken and decide to record it. Another reason some crimes might not get recorded is that not all crimes have an obvious victim, this means

  2. Describe the meaning of official statistics, victim surveys and self-reported studies as ways of ...

    Studies such as that of Steven box, (1981) have added validity to this method of recording. Box rejects theories that some groups' particularly young working class men are more likely to commit crime than any others are. Different classes may commit different types of crime but this dose not necessarily

  1. Official Crime Statistics Analysis

    "A positivistic method is like instructions on a child's chemistry set". 2% of all crimes committed result in conviction because of trivial, seriousness of offence and allocation of resources. "Hidden" figure number of unrecorded crime Heidensohn: Most sociological theories based on OCS have solely focus on male criminality and neglect the fact that 20% of crime is committed by females.

  2. This research project attempts to contrast local crime trends with the British Crime Survey ...

    The higher the victims social standing and the more serious the offence or if the police see the victim as more deserving, the amount of police time increases and the more likely they are to apprehend the perpetrator. Lea and Young have offered a number of solutions to the reduction of crime.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work