• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Evaluate the Holistic (macro) Approaches to the Study of Crime & Deviance

Extracts from this document...


Evaluate the Holistic (macro) Approaches to the Study of Crime & Deviance There are three main macro approaches towards crime and deviance I will introduce in this essay. I will also be discussing one micro approach to criticise their theories. Holistic approaches tend to look at society as a whole, rather than biological and psychological explanations. The functionalist perspective is a very holistic view. Deviance to them is explained by society and its institutions; they believe that the police, courts and other ways of maintaining social order are important. But they also agree that some deviance is functional. Durkheim was a functionalist, he argued that deviance is inevitable, and even a normal aspect of social life although it could become dysfunctional if it became out of hand. Crime and deviance is present in all societies and as societies develops crime increases. This cane been seen by the arrival if the industrial revolution, Durkheim felt that collective conscious would be weakened and society would become more anonymous. The different roles of people and increased division of labour had brought about separation of society and divided to population into different classes of wealth. ...read more.


This is why traditional Marxists say that the statistics on crime and deviance are distorted as they only record the crime that they are looking for. Middle class crime or white collar crime like tax fraud and fiddling tends to be over looked. It is a fact that street crime is more likely to be pursued and even when white collar crime is exposed it is less likely to be reported. Durkheim said that that law reflects the will of the people but Marxist says that it reflects the will of the powerful. The middle class are also more beneficial by the law as they are the ones creating the law and the ones enforcing it. Marxists also see crime as a good thing; they state that it leads society to change. This is linked to historical materialism - when society changed from traditional to fudal to ancient and to today's communist society. Crime is seen as good as it helps society to change from one stage to the next. ...read more.


The interactionist (micro) approach views deviance from a different theoretical perspective, its more concerned with understanding the motives and the meanings of crime and deviance. Micro approaches tend to look at the groups themselves and want to find the root or the cause. Howard S. suggested that there is no such thing as a deviant act and it only becomes deviant when others define it as deviant. Becker finds Deviance to be a product of a label. For example if people see an individual to being deviant an a misfit they may respond to the label an live up to it as that's what is expected of them. Therefore Becker argues that "deviance is not a quality that lies in behaviour itself, nut in the interaction between the person who commits the act and those who respond to it." Becker is more concerned with how labels influence crime and deviance and its responses, not with the whole of society. So from the interactionist perspective deviance is produced by a process of interaction between the potential deviant and the agents of social control. The macro holistic approaches just look at the social control. ?? ?? ?? ?? Meera Makwana Mr Woodburn - Sociology ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Crime & Deviance section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Crime & Deviance essays

  1. Sociological Theories on Crime and Deviance

    As Durkheim argued, deviance is functional for the whole of society, not just those with a major stake in the economic system. Feminism Statistics show an overwhelming level of male crime in comparison to females. In this handout we will attempt to explain why.

  2. Evaluate Functionalist Theories of Crime and Deviance

    providing the informal social bonds which he claims are lost when a society expands in size. Shaw and McKay, in their "Social Disorganization Theory" explicitly tried to link the idea of area to human and criminal behaviour. They did this through an analysis of the "Concentric Zones" of a city.

  1. describe four studies relating to crime and deviance - each from a different perspective. ...

    lower class segment of society and its most common conclusion was the 'juvenile gang'. (Haralambos, 2000, page 357) Cohen viewed the creation of the subculture as a collective response to adolescents' low ranking position in the class structure. The difference between classes can often indicate the amount of opportunities available to the adolescent.

  2. Compare and Contrast the Main Sociological Theories of Deviance.

    The post-institutional experience of many people is stigmatisation and social rejection, particularly in the case of prisons, but also asylums. The deviant is ascribed a negative identity which in many cases is irreversible. The Marxist approach has been one of the most important approaches in explaining deviant behaviour.

  1. Compare and evaluate Subcultural theory and labelling theory

    one that is not far away, this will help them to realise that they can achieve and fit into the norms of society which will give them the opportunity to succeed in society and most importantly in their life. I feel that this does play a part in today's society,

  2. Evaluate subcultural explanations for crime and deviance

    The third subculture they identified were retreatist subcultures which concentrated on alcohol and drug abuse. This was stated to occur when youths were denied access to both criminal and conflict subcultures. Miller rejected the structural origins of crime and deviance as presented in the above.

  1. Access the strengths and limitations of Subcultural Theories in explaining deviance.

    Conflict Subculture- Here, conflict subculture develops in areas where there is little opportunity to gain access to a criminal subculture. As such, there is no real opportunity to acquire role models and criminal skills. These areas have a transient population and no 'community spirit'.

  2. Outline and Assess Sociological Approaches to Social Control Within Crime and Deviance

    Disney, for example, controls tens of thousands of people each day in its parks, in subtle, invisible ways, yet everyone still adheres to Disney's behavioural wishes. Yet how does this social control affect deviant and criminal behaviour? The first problem many sociologists must overcome when discussing social control and behaviour, is to define both the terms deviant and criminal.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work