• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Evaluate the strengths and limitations of using covert participant observation to investigate pupils with behavioural difficulties

Extracts from this document...


Transfer-Encoding: chunked Applying material from item B and your knowledge of research methods, evaluate the strengths and limitations of using covert participant observation to investigate pupils with behavioural difficulties. (20 Marks) Pupils who experience behavioural problems within the education system are often male and from a working class background. Sociologists may choose to study children using covert participant observation (cbo) to increase validity. Studying children in general can however, raise many practical and ethical issues. Access is the main practical issue in this investigation. Gatekeepers such as other teachers prohibit access to the children. In order to gain lawful access, cbo would allow the sociologist to take on the role of an assistant teacher. ...read more.


For example, a female sociologist is most likely to fit the criteria for the interviewer. This is because a large majority of working class boys are raised in lone parent families, 90% of which are headed by a woman. Working class boys may look to the sociologist as a mother figure, increasing the chances of them confiding in her. Furthermore, she would have to be working class and use restricted code when communicating with the children to become more ?relatable? to the social group. This would allow the sociologist to build a rapport with the children, further increasing the validity of the investigation. The Item suggests that behavioural problems stem from external factors such as cultural and material deprivation. ...read more.


It is subjective and individual. Factors leading to behaviour are complex just like human beings. The problem with cpo is that it is unrepresentative, and does not allow sociologists to record a pattern of how someone might behave, depending on their background. For this reason, sociologists such as positivists would reject this method of collecting information. If an interviewer creates a rapport with the students, it might affect their opinions on the children. Their views could become twisted and biased, not emphasizing the reality of the situation out of favouring the child. It is difficult to access areas without being deceitful and failing to protect the individuals within school. A search would also have to be conducted to find the sociologist with the right characteristics to fit the regulations needed in order to gain respect of the interviewees. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Sociological Differentiation & Stratification section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Sociological Differentiation & Stratification essays

  1. Assess the usefulness of participant observation as a research method for sociologists.

    Positivists would score participant observation low for reliability and generalisability. One study that uses participant observation is Eileen Barker's making of a moonie. She used a mixture of interviews and participant observations. This gave her access into a religious sect that was getting very bad publicity at the time and a chance to find out the truth behind the 'moonies'.

  2. Assess the strengths and weaknesses of participant observation, as a research method

    This was pointed out by Lewis Yablonsky in 1973. Therefore, because participant observation enables the sociologist to build a relationship with the group, it has proved to be a successful method of studying 'outsider' groups. Police also go undercover and use participant observation, when dealing with a harder case.

  1. Examine The Problems That Some Sociologists May Find When Using Participant Observations In Research

    Another disadvantage of using participant observations is the time, money and personal cost it entails. Participant observations can be done over a number of months, during which the researcher is usually cut off from the support of their family and friends, giving them personal stress.

  2. Participant Observation

    The research does not artificially interfere with people's lives and they are free to act as normal. This allows the researcher to gain an insight, which surveys cannot produce. Supporters of this research method argue that compared to other research techniques, it is least likely to lead to sociologists imposing

  1. Examine the problems sociologists may find when using participant observation in their research.

    Methods such as participant observation that produce qualitative data are seen to be high in validity.

  2. An investigation into people(TM)s belief about Hell

    According to those such as Wilson, the decline in the belief in Hell allows people to exercise their free will as they no longer feel afraid of eternal punishment for their wrongdoings. This consequently allows them to conduct their lives in the way that they want.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work