• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Examination of the Functionalist view that schools serve the interests of both society and individuals.

Extracts from this document...


Examination of the Functionalist view that schools serve the interests of both society and individuals. The functionalist perspective is that society consists of institutions that are required to perform functional pre-requisites that are necessary for society to function. Schools are one of these institutions, and contribute to society by educating children and providing them with the necessary skills needed in working life later on. Also, schools provide secondary socialisation, taking over from the family, to instil societies beliefs and values in children and this is important to maintain social order by ensuring value consensus. Functionalist Emile Durkheim saw this secondary socialisation as being the main function of the education system. He looks at social solidarity, which teaches children a commitment to society and expresses the sense of the social unit being more important than the individual. Schools teach social solidarity through such things as assemblies, sports days, and in Durkheim's research in America, through saluting the flag before school. Durkhiem also sees the teaching of history in schools as being vital to creating solidarity, all of these giving children a sense of commitment and identity. Durkheim also looked at how schools teach social rules and how the school is a 'society in miniature'. ...read more.


It therefore serves both the needs of society by maintaining consensus and harmony and also the interests of the individual who receives a fair education with as equal an opportunity to do well as their peers. Marxists, however, criticise the functionalist viewpoint and would argue that this stance ignores the inequality in society. It disagrees with the idea that education acts as a neutral sifting process where ability is the only factor regarding achievement. They would argue that social class is very much an influencing factor in success and that no equality of opportunity exists within education. Bowles and Gintis argue that the main function of the education system is to ensure adequate labour power for the capitalist class. Also they believe that education is subservient to the needs of the dominant class and due to this there is a great level of correspondence between what occurs in schools through the hidden curriculum and what happens in the workplace. This is referred to as Bowles and Gintis' 'Correspondence theory'. There are four main correspondences that are highlighted, firstly, that schools produce subservience and the education system is set so that those who conform do well whereas those who do not, do badly. ...read more.


Willis theory on education is similar to Bowles and Gintis in that there are correspondences between the workplace and education but it is not as deterministic and shows that it is possible for the individual to resist capitalism. The main criticisms of Willis findings are that it involved only a small sample, all of who were male, and therefore cannot be used to generalise for the whole population. Also as the study involved participant observation the subjects were therefore aware of the study and as such may have acted differently under this situation. Overall the education system does appear to benefit society, be it a meritocratic society from the functionalist view, or a capitalist society from the Marxist perspective. It provides society with an educated workforce and, whether they are right or wrong, teaches the norms and values of society. However whilst functionalists argue that the individuals interests are served well by the education system it seems that their idea of education does not truly exist and that equality of educational opportunity is not prevalent and thus the interests of individuals could be better served in a system that is free from discrimination on the basis of gender, class or ethnicity. ?? ?? ?? ?? Becky Screech 1 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Work & Leisure section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Work & Leisure essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Critically Evaluate the Functionalist Perspective on Education

    5 star(s)

    With the exception of a few individuals, Marxists feel that education confirms individuals' class status as their class of destination. Therefore education is a means of reproduction of the present class inequalities from generation to generation, and in doing this shows there is no means of upward social mobility as the Functionalists claim.

  2. 'The function of education is to reproduce and legitimate social inequality. Discuss.'

    Bordieu has been criticised by Jenkins (1992) who said that workers accept inequality, not because they see it as justified but because they have no say in the matter. Bordieu assumes that education does not provide opportunity for the working class. He paints a circular picture of class reproduction and implies that social and cultural change is impossible when it quite obviously isn't.

  1. Using material from Item A and elsewhere assess the contribution of functionalist sociology to ...

    Bowles and Ginitis based their study on schooling in capitalist America. They argue that the major role of education is the reproduction of labour power. The correspondence principle provides the key to understand the workings of the education system. Education is subservient to the needs of those who control the workforce and the means of production.

  2. According to Marxist, the main aim of the education system is to provide capitalist ...

    As a result of this girls tend to opt for subjects (despite their inclination) that do not challenge their feminine self concept. In most cases girls do not have the confidence to attempt to break stereotypical borders, by taking on non traditional subjects.

  1. Functions of the family for individuals and for society

    These consist of capitalism education, politics and laws. The negative side of the Marxist theory is that; they rely on the stereotypical generalisation of the nuclear family, however, nowadays more family types exist. These are: extended, reconstituted, single-parent and single-sex relationships.

  2. Assess the strengths and limitations of participant observation for the study of labelling in ...

    Gaining an insight into people's thoughts, actions and values means that the researcher can begin to properly understand what makes them behave the way they do and why. Participant observation enables the researcher to gain new information which could go against a hypothesis.

  1. Marxist and functionalist perspective on education

    Because they are more important!' The ruling class make decisions as to what jobs are most important. They can reward those doing the 'most important jobs as they choose.' For example a pop star may be exceptionally well paid, does this therefore mean that this job is functionally more important for society than that of a nurse or a teacher or even a road sweeper?

  2. Outline and assess the view that the main purpose of education is to encourage ...

    Education and in particular the teaching of history, provides the link between the individual and society. If the history of their society is brought alive to children, they will come to see that they are part of something larger than themselves; they will develop a sense of commitment to the social group.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work